Cargando…

Inotropic support in cardiogenic shock: who leads the battle, milrinone or dobutamine?

Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of death globally, with acute myocardial infarction being one of the most frequent. One of the complications that can occur after a myocardial infarction is cardiogenic shock. At present, the evidence on the use of inotropic agents for the management...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lozada Martinez, Ivan David, Bayona-Gamboa, Andrea Juliana, Meza-Fandiño, Duvier Fabián, Paz-Echeverry, Omar Andrés, Ávila-Bonilla, Ángela María, Paz-Echeverry, Mario Javier, Pineda-Trujillo, Frank Jaider, Rodríguez-García, Gina Paola, Covaleda-Vargas, Jaime Enrique, Narvaez-Rojas, Alexis Rafael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9577832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36268289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104763
Descripción
Sumario:Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of death globally, with acute myocardial infarction being one of the most frequent. One of the complications that can occur after a myocardial infarction is cardiogenic shock. At present, the evidence on the use of inotropic agents for the management of this complication is scarce, and only a few trials have evaluated the efficacy-adverse effects relationship of some agents. Milrinone and Dobutamine are some of the most frequently mentioned drugs that have been studied recently. However, there are still no data that affirm with certainty the supremacy of one over the other. The aim of this review is to synthesize evidence on basic and practical aspects of these agents, allowing us to conclude which might be more useful in current clinical practice, based on the emerging literature.