One- versus two-stage partial hepatectomy for large resectable solitary hepatocellular carcinomas determined preoperatively to have a narrow resection margin: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND: For patients with a large but resectable solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of >5 cm in diameter, it is often difficult to achieve a sufficient resection margin. There is still no study on whether a two-stage hepatectomy to increase a narrow resection margin would be beneficial. METHODS: From August 2014 to February 2017, patients with a large but resectable solitary HCC of >5 cm and a preoperative estimated resection margin of <1.0 cm were retrospectively studied. They were divided into one- and two-stage resection groups. A retrospective analysis was performed, followed by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Disease recurrence, survival, intraoperative and postoperative data were compared. RESULTS: Before PSM, the 1-, 2-, 3-and 4-year recurrence-free survival rates for the one- and two-stage groups were 44.3%, 31.7%, 24.3%, 19.2% versus 60.6%, 45.4%, 43.5%, 32.3%, respectively (P=0.007). The corresponding OS rates were 61.0%, 45.2%, 43.8%, 38.4% versus 69.6%, 62.5%, 60.7%, 57.3%, respectively (P=0.029). After PSM, the 1-, 2-, 3-and 4-year recurrence-free survival rates for the one- and two-stage groups were 44.0%, 31.5%, 27.3%, 21.0% versus 60.6%, 45.4%, 43.5%, 32.3%, respectively (P=0.013). The corresponding OS rates were 62.5%, 41.1%, 41.1%, 37.5% versus 69.6%, 62.5%, 60.7%, 57.3%, respectively (P=0.038). Differences in the resection margins between the one- and two-stage groups before [0.3 (0–0.5) versus 1.2 (0.8–2.2) cm] and after [0.2 (0–0.5) versus 1.2 (0.8–2.2) cm] PSM were also significant. CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage hepatectomy allowed a wider resection margin for patients with a resectable but solitary HCC of >5 cm, and resulted in significantly better long-term survival outcomes after partial hepatectomy.