Cargando…
The influence of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography on the N- and M-staging and subsequent clinical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a highly metastatic cancer. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) enables sensitive tumor and metastasis detection. Our aim is to evaluate the influence of pre-treatment PET/CT on the N- and M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9577996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36268256 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-21-25 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a highly metastatic cancer. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) enables sensitive tumor and metastasis detection. Our aim is to evaluate the influence of pre-treatment PET/CT on the N- and M-staging and subsequent clinical management in ICC patients. METHODS: Between August 2010 and August 2018, 660 consecutive ICC patients, without prior anti-tumor treatments nor other malignancies, were enrolled. The diagnostic performance of PET/CT on the N- and M-staging was compared with conventional imaging, and the preoperative staging accuracy and treatment re-allocation by PET/CT were retrospectively calculated. Survival difference was compared between patients receiving PET/CT or not after propensity score matching. RESULTS: Patients were divided into group A (n=291) and group B (n=369) according to whether PET/CT was performed. Among 291 patients with both PET/CT and conventional imaging for staging in group A, PET/CT showed significantly higher sensitivity (83.0% vs. 70.5%, P=0.001), specificity (88.3% vs. 74.9%, P<0.001) and accuracy (86.3% vs. 73.2%, P<0.001) than conventional imaging in diagnosing regional lymph node metastasis, as well as higher sensitivity (87.8% vs. 67.6%, P<0.001) and accuracy (93.5% vs. 89.3%, P=0.023) in diagnosing distant metastasis. Overall, PET/CT improved the accuracy of preoperative staging from 60.1% to 71.8% (P<0.001), and modified clinical treatment strategy in 5.8% (17/291) of ICC patients, with unique roles in different tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stages. High tumor-to-non-tumor ratio (TNR) predicted poor overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.17; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49–3.15; P<0.001]. Furthermore, patients performing PET/CT had longer overall survival compared with those without PET/CT (HR =0.74; 95% CI: 0.58–0.93; P=0.011) after propensity score matching. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT was valuable for diagnosing regional lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis in ICC patients, and facilitated accurate tumor staging and optimal treatment allocation. |
---|