Cargando…

Comparison of complications and long-term survival after minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

OBJECTIVE: To compare the complications and long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) versus open esophagectomy (OE) using propensity score matching (PSM). METHODS: Esophageal cancer patients who un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rong, Yu, Hao, Yanbing, Xue, Jun, Li, Xiaoyuan, Li, Qian, Wang, Li, Li, Tian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36267968
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.934950
_version_ 1784811950104903680
author Rong, Yu
Hao, Yanbing
Xue, Jun
Li, Xiaoyuan
Li, Qian
Wang, Li
Li, Tian
author_facet Rong, Yu
Hao, Yanbing
Xue, Jun
Li, Xiaoyuan
Li, Qian
Wang, Li
Li, Tian
author_sort Rong, Yu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the complications and long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) versus open esophagectomy (OE) using propensity score matching (PSM). METHODS: Esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy at the Thoracic Surgery Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University from January 2010 to December 2018 were retrospectively enrolled. The incidence of postoperative complications and prognosis of the MIE (n = 132) and OE (n = 138) groups were compared. To reduce bias, 1:1 PSM was adopted for the analysis. RESULTS: The median disease-free survival (DFS) of the MIE and OE groups were 24 months and 26 months, respectively, and neither group reached median survival. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of 3-year DFS and overall survival (OS). The stratification of the patients on the basis of the percentage of estimated forced expiratory volume in the first second (%FEV1) did not result in significant differences in the survival rates. A total of 42 patients (50%) in the MIE group and 55 patients (65.48%) in the OE group experienced complications, and the difference was statistically significant (OR=0.527, 95% CI: 0.283–0.981, P=0.042). The incidence of acute COPD exacerbation (OR=0.213, 95% OR, CI: 0.068–0.666, P=0.004) and pulmonary atelectasis requiring bronchoscopic aspiration (OR=0.232, 95% OR, CI: 0.082–0.659, P=0.004) were significantly higher in the OE versus the MIE group. In addition, the distribution of the various grades of complications also differed significantly between the two groups (P=0.016). While the incidence of minor complications (≤Grade II) was similar in both groups (P=0.503), that of severe complications (≥Grade III) was markedly higher in the OE group (P=0.002) and the Grade-IIIa complications were predominant (P=0.001). The severity of complications was correlated with the postoperative duration of hospital stay in both groups (r=0.187, P=0.015). No significant difference was observed in the incidence of minor complications (≤Grade II) between the two groups following stratification on the basis of %FEV1, whereas severe complications were more frequent in the OE group among patients with %FEV1 between 60% and 70% (P=0.001<0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the postoperative DFS and OS of esophageal cancer patients with COPD after undergoing MIE or OE. However, MIE significantly reduced the incidence of severe postoperative complications among patients with %FEV1 between 60% and 70%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9578335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95783352022-10-19 Comparison of complications and long-term survival after minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Rong, Yu Hao, Yanbing Xue, Jun Li, Xiaoyuan Li, Qian Wang, Li Li, Tian Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: To compare the complications and long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) versus open esophagectomy (OE) using propensity score matching (PSM). METHODS: Esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy at the Thoracic Surgery Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University from January 2010 to December 2018 were retrospectively enrolled. The incidence of postoperative complications and prognosis of the MIE (n = 132) and OE (n = 138) groups were compared. To reduce bias, 1:1 PSM was adopted for the analysis. RESULTS: The median disease-free survival (DFS) of the MIE and OE groups were 24 months and 26 months, respectively, and neither group reached median survival. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of 3-year DFS and overall survival (OS). The stratification of the patients on the basis of the percentage of estimated forced expiratory volume in the first second (%FEV1) did not result in significant differences in the survival rates. A total of 42 patients (50%) in the MIE group and 55 patients (65.48%) in the OE group experienced complications, and the difference was statistically significant (OR=0.527, 95% CI: 0.283–0.981, P=0.042). The incidence of acute COPD exacerbation (OR=0.213, 95% OR, CI: 0.068–0.666, P=0.004) and pulmonary atelectasis requiring bronchoscopic aspiration (OR=0.232, 95% OR, CI: 0.082–0.659, P=0.004) were significantly higher in the OE versus the MIE group. In addition, the distribution of the various grades of complications also differed significantly between the two groups (P=0.016). While the incidence of minor complications (≤Grade II) was similar in both groups (P=0.503), that of severe complications (≥Grade III) was markedly higher in the OE group (P=0.002) and the Grade-IIIa complications were predominant (P=0.001). The severity of complications was correlated with the postoperative duration of hospital stay in both groups (r=0.187, P=0.015). No significant difference was observed in the incidence of minor complications (≤Grade II) between the two groups following stratification on the basis of %FEV1, whereas severe complications were more frequent in the OE group among patients with %FEV1 between 60% and 70% (P=0.001<0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the postoperative DFS and OS of esophageal cancer patients with COPD after undergoing MIE or OE. However, MIE significantly reduced the incidence of severe postoperative complications among patients with %FEV1 between 60% and 70%. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9578335/ /pubmed/36267968 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.934950 Text en Copyright © 2022 Rong, Hao, Xue, Li, Li, Wang and Li https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Rong, Yu
Hao, Yanbing
Xue, Jun
Li, Xiaoyuan
Li, Qian
Wang, Li
Li, Tian
Comparison of complications and long-term survival after minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title Comparison of complications and long-term survival after minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_full Comparison of complications and long-term survival after minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_fullStr Comparison of complications and long-term survival after minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of complications and long-term survival after minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_short Comparison of complications and long-term survival after minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
title_sort comparison of complications and long-term survival after minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36267968
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.934950
work_keys_str_mv AT rongyu comparisonofcomplicationsandlongtermsurvivalafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyinpatientswithesophagealcancerandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT haoyanbing comparisonofcomplicationsandlongtermsurvivalafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyinpatientswithesophagealcancerandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT xuejun comparisonofcomplicationsandlongtermsurvivalafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyinpatientswithesophagealcancerandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT lixiaoyuan comparisonofcomplicationsandlongtermsurvivalafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyinpatientswithesophagealcancerandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT liqian comparisonofcomplicationsandlongtermsurvivalafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyinpatientswithesophagealcancerandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT wangli comparisonofcomplicationsandlongtermsurvivalafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyinpatientswithesophagealcancerandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease
AT litian comparisonofcomplicationsandlongtermsurvivalafterminimallyinvasiveesophagectomyversusopenesophagectomyinpatientswithesophagealcancerandchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease