Cargando…

Health Literacy in Health Professionals Two Years into the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results From a Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: Health literacy (HL) is an important public health goal but also crucial in individuals providing medical care. During the pandemic, COVID-19–related HL of health professionals (HPs) has gained momentum; it helps to minimize the risk of self-infection, on the one hand, and to protect pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grepmeier, Eva-Maria, Pawellek, Maja, Curbach, Janina, von Sommoggy, Julia, Drewitz, Karl Philipp, Hasenpusch, Claudia, Bitzer, Eva Maria, Apfelbacher, Christian, Matterne, Uwe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36179148
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39023
_version_ 1784811980467470336
author Grepmeier, Eva-Maria
Pawellek, Maja
Curbach, Janina
von Sommoggy, Julia
Drewitz, Karl Philipp
Hasenpusch, Claudia
Bitzer, Eva Maria
Apfelbacher, Christian
Matterne, Uwe
author_facet Grepmeier, Eva-Maria
Pawellek, Maja
Curbach, Janina
von Sommoggy, Julia
Drewitz, Karl Philipp
Hasenpusch, Claudia
Bitzer, Eva Maria
Apfelbacher, Christian
Matterne, Uwe
author_sort Grepmeier, Eva-Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health literacy (HL) is an important public health goal but also crucial in individuals providing medical care. During the pandemic, COVID-19–related HL of health professionals (HPs) has gained momentum; it helps to minimize the risk of self-infection, on the one hand, and to protect patients and relatives from infection, on the other. However, comprehensive information about the levels of individual pandemic-related HL in HPs is scarce. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we aimed at describing the extent of existing research on HL (concept) conducted in HPs (population) in the COVID-19 pandemic (context). The review intends to map the literature on HL in HPs, thereby highlighting research gaps. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted using the methodology of Khalil et al (2016). This involved an electronic search of PubMed (MEDLINE) and PsycInfo and a hand search. The included studies were iteratively examined to find items representing the four HL dimensions of access, understand, critically appraise, and apply COVID-19–related health information. RESULTS: The search yielded a total of 3875 references. Only 7 (1.4%) of the 489 included studies explicitly stated to have addressed HL; 2 (0.4%) studies attempted to develop an instrument measuring COVID-19–related HL in HPs; 6 (1.2%) studies included an HL measure in an observational survey design. Of the remainder, the vast majority used a cross-sectional design. The dimensions access and understand were frequently examined, but few studies looked at the dimensions critical appraisal or apply. Very few studies reported an intervention aiming to improve a COVID-19–related HL outcome. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of COVID-19–related HL among HPs are necessary to ensure not only safe practice with necessary protection of HPs, their patients, and relatives, but also successful care delivery and subsequently improved health outcomes in the long term. To advance our understanding of how high COVID-19–related HL manifests itself in HPs, how it relates to health outcomes, and how it can be improved, more research is necessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework dbfa5; https://osf.io/dbfa5/
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9578515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95785152022-10-19 Health Literacy in Health Professionals Two Years into the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results From a Scoping Review Grepmeier, Eva-Maria Pawellek, Maja Curbach, Janina von Sommoggy, Julia Drewitz, Karl Philipp Hasenpusch, Claudia Bitzer, Eva Maria Apfelbacher, Christian Matterne, Uwe JMIR Med Educ Review BACKGROUND: Health literacy (HL) is an important public health goal but also crucial in individuals providing medical care. During the pandemic, COVID-19–related HL of health professionals (HPs) has gained momentum; it helps to minimize the risk of self-infection, on the one hand, and to protect patients and relatives from infection, on the other. However, comprehensive information about the levels of individual pandemic-related HL in HPs is scarce. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we aimed at describing the extent of existing research on HL (concept) conducted in HPs (population) in the COVID-19 pandemic (context). The review intends to map the literature on HL in HPs, thereby highlighting research gaps. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted using the methodology of Khalil et al (2016). This involved an electronic search of PubMed (MEDLINE) and PsycInfo and a hand search. The included studies were iteratively examined to find items representing the four HL dimensions of access, understand, critically appraise, and apply COVID-19–related health information. RESULTS: The search yielded a total of 3875 references. Only 7 (1.4%) of the 489 included studies explicitly stated to have addressed HL; 2 (0.4%) studies attempted to develop an instrument measuring COVID-19–related HL in HPs; 6 (1.2%) studies included an HL measure in an observational survey design. Of the remainder, the vast majority used a cross-sectional design. The dimensions access and understand were frequently examined, but few studies looked at the dimensions critical appraisal or apply. Very few studies reported an intervention aiming to improve a COVID-19–related HL outcome. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of COVID-19–related HL among HPs are necessary to ensure not only safe practice with necessary protection of HPs, their patients, and relatives, but also successful care delivery and subsequently improved health outcomes in the long term. To advance our understanding of how high COVID-19–related HL manifests itself in HPs, how it relates to health outcomes, and how it can be improved, more research is necessary. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework dbfa5; https://osf.io/dbfa5/ JMIR Publications 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9578515/ /pubmed/36179148 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39023 Text en ©Eva-Maria Grepmeier, Maja Pawellek, Janina Curbach, Julia von Sommoggy, Karl Philipp Drewitz, Claudia Hasenpusch, Eva Maria Bitzer, Christian Apfelbacher, Uwe Matterne. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 17.10.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Education, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mededu.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Grepmeier, Eva-Maria
Pawellek, Maja
Curbach, Janina
von Sommoggy, Julia
Drewitz, Karl Philipp
Hasenpusch, Claudia
Bitzer, Eva Maria
Apfelbacher, Christian
Matterne, Uwe
Health Literacy in Health Professionals Two Years into the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results From a Scoping Review
title Health Literacy in Health Professionals Two Years into the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results From a Scoping Review
title_full Health Literacy in Health Professionals Two Years into the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results From a Scoping Review
title_fullStr Health Literacy in Health Professionals Two Years into the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results From a Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Health Literacy in Health Professionals Two Years into the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results From a Scoping Review
title_short Health Literacy in Health Professionals Two Years into the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results From a Scoping Review
title_sort health literacy in health professionals two years into the covid-19 pandemic: results from a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36179148
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39023
work_keys_str_mv AT grepmeierevamaria healthliteracyinhealthprofessionalstwoyearsintothecovid19pandemicresultsfromascopingreview
AT pawellekmaja healthliteracyinhealthprofessionalstwoyearsintothecovid19pandemicresultsfromascopingreview
AT curbachjanina healthliteracyinhealthprofessionalstwoyearsintothecovid19pandemicresultsfromascopingreview
AT vonsommoggyjulia healthliteracyinhealthprofessionalstwoyearsintothecovid19pandemicresultsfromascopingreview
AT drewitzkarlphilipp healthliteracyinhealthprofessionalstwoyearsintothecovid19pandemicresultsfromascopingreview
AT hasenpuschclaudia healthliteracyinhealthprofessionalstwoyearsintothecovid19pandemicresultsfromascopingreview
AT bitzerevamaria healthliteracyinhealthprofessionalstwoyearsintothecovid19pandemicresultsfromascopingreview
AT apfelbacherchristian healthliteracyinhealthprofessionalstwoyearsintothecovid19pandemicresultsfromascopingreview
AT matterneuwe healthliteracyinhealthprofessionalstwoyearsintothecovid19pandemicresultsfromascopingreview