Cargando…

“Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care

What are the care-seeking priorities of people living with chronic pain and carers and how can these shape interdisciplinary workforce training to improve high-value pain care? Phase 1: Australian people living with chronic pain (n = 206; 90% female) and carers (n = 10; 40% female) described their p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slater, Helen, Jordan, Joanne E., O'Sullivan, Peter B., Schütze, Robert, Goucke, Roger, Chua, Jason, Browne, Allyson, Horgan, Ben, De Morgan, Simone, Briggs, Andrew M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35384928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002647
_version_ 1784811984611442688
author Slater, Helen
Jordan, Joanne E.
O'Sullivan, Peter B.
Schütze, Robert
Goucke, Roger
Chua, Jason
Browne, Allyson
Horgan, Ben
De Morgan, Simone
Briggs, Andrew M.
author_facet Slater, Helen
Jordan, Joanne E.
O'Sullivan, Peter B.
Schütze, Robert
Goucke, Roger
Chua, Jason
Browne, Allyson
Horgan, Ben
De Morgan, Simone
Briggs, Andrew M.
author_sort Slater, Helen
collection PubMed
description What are the care-seeking priorities of people living with chronic pain and carers and how can these shape interdisciplinary workforce training to improve high-value pain care? Phase 1: Australian people living with chronic pain (n = 206; 90% female) and carers (n = 10; 40% female) described their pain care priorities (eDelphi, round 1). A coding framework was inductively derived from 842 pain care priorities (9 categories, 52 priorities), including validation; communication; multidisciplinary approaches; holistic care; partnerships; practitioner knowledge; self-management; medicines; and diagnosis. Phase 2: In eDelphi round 2, panellists (n = 170; valid responses) rated the importance (1 = less important; 9 = more important) of the represented framework. In parallel, cross-discipline health professionals (n = 267; 75% female) rated the importance of these same priorities. Applying the RAND-UCLA method (panel medians: 1-3: “not important,” 4-6: “equivocal,” or 7-9: “important”), “important” items were retained where the panel median score was >7 with panel agreement ≥70%, with 44 items (84.6%) retained. Specific workforce training targets included the following: empathic validation; effective, respectful, safe communication; and ensuring genuine partnerships in coplanning personalised care. Panellists and health professionals agreed or strongly agreed (95.7% and 95.2%, respectively) that this framework meaningfully reflected the importance in care seeking for pain. More than 74% of health professionals were fairly or extremely confident in their ability to support care priorities for 6 of 9 categories (66.7%). Phase 3: An interdisciplinary panel (n = 5) mapped an existing foundation-level workforce training program against the framework, identifying gaps and training targets. Recommendations were determined for framework adoption to genuinely shape, from a partnership perspective, Australian interdisciplinary pain training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9578532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95785322022-10-19 “Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care Slater, Helen Jordan, Joanne E. O'Sullivan, Peter B. Schütze, Robert Goucke, Roger Chua, Jason Browne, Allyson Horgan, Ben De Morgan, Simone Briggs, Andrew M. Pain Research Paper What are the care-seeking priorities of people living with chronic pain and carers and how can these shape interdisciplinary workforce training to improve high-value pain care? Phase 1: Australian people living with chronic pain (n = 206; 90% female) and carers (n = 10; 40% female) described their pain care priorities (eDelphi, round 1). A coding framework was inductively derived from 842 pain care priorities (9 categories, 52 priorities), including validation; communication; multidisciplinary approaches; holistic care; partnerships; practitioner knowledge; self-management; medicines; and diagnosis. Phase 2: In eDelphi round 2, panellists (n = 170; valid responses) rated the importance (1 = less important; 9 = more important) of the represented framework. In parallel, cross-discipline health professionals (n = 267; 75% female) rated the importance of these same priorities. Applying the RAND-UCLA method (panel medians: 1-3: “not important,” 4-6: “equivocal,” or 7-9: “important”), “important” items were retained where the panel median score was >7 with panel agreement ≥70%, with 44 items (84.6%) retained. Specific workforce training targets included the following: empathic validation; effective, respectful, safe communication; and ensuring genuine partnerships in coplanning personalised care. Panellists and health professionals agreed or strongly agreed (95.7% and 95.2%, respectively) that this framework meaningfully reflected the importance in care seeking for pain. More than 74% of health professionals were fairly or extremely confident in their ability to support care priorities for 6 of 9 categories (66.7%). Phase 3: An interdisciplinary panel (n = 5) mapped an existing foundation-level workforce training program against the framework, identifying gaps and training targets. Recommendations were determined for framework adoption to genuinely shape, from a partnership perspective, Australian interdisciplinary pain training. Wolters Kluwer 2022-11 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9578532/ /pubmed/35384928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002647 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Pain. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Slater, Helen
Jordan, Joanne E.
O'Sullivan, Peter B.
Schütze, Robert
Goucke, Roger
Chua, Jason
Browne, Allyson
Horgan, Ben
De Morgan, Simone
Briggs, Andrew M.
“Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care
title “Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care
title_full “Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care
title_fullStr “Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care
title_full_unstemmed “Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care
title_short “Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care
title_sort “listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35384928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002647
work_keys_str_mv AT slaterhelen listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare
AT jordanjoannee listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare
AT osullivanpeterb listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare
AT schutzerobert listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare
AT gouckeroger listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare
AT chuajason listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare
AT browneallyson listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare
AT horganben listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare
AT demorgansimone listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare
AT briggsandrewm listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare