Cargando…
“Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care
What are the care-seeking priorities of people living with chronic pain and carers and how can these shape interdisciplinary workforce training to improve high-value pain care? Phase 1: Australian people living with chronic pain (n = 206; 90% female) and carers (n = 10; 40% female) described their p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35384928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002647 |
_version_ | 1784811984611442688 |
---|---|
author | Slater, Helen Jordan, Joanne E. O'Sullivan, Peter B. Schütze, Robert Goucke, Roger Chua, Jason Browne, Allyson Horgan, Ben De Morgan, Simone Briggs, Andrew M. |
author_facet | Slater, Helen Jordan, Joanne E. O'Sullivan, Peter B. Schütze, Robert Goucke, Roger Chua, Jason Browne, Allyson Horgan, Ben De Morgan, Simone Briggs, Andrew M. |
author_sort | Slater, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | What are the care-seeking priorities of people living with chronic pain and carers and how can these shape interdisciplinary workforce training to improve high-value pain care? Phase 1: Australian people living with chronic pain (n = 206; 90% female) and carers (n = 10; 40% female) described their pain care priorities (eDelphi, round 1). A coding framework was inductively derived from 842 pain care priorities (9 categories, 52 priorities), including validation; communication; multidisciplinary approaches; holistic care; partnerships; practitioner knowledge; self-management; medicines; and diagnosis. Phase 2: In eDelphi round 2, panellists (n = 170; valid responses) rated the importance (1 = less important; 9 = more important) of the represented framework. In parallel, cross-discipline health professionals (n = 267; 75% female) rated the importance of these same priorities. Applying the RAND-UCLA method (panel medians: 1-3: “not important,” 4-6: “equivocal,” or 7-9: “important”), “important” items were retained where the panel median score was >7 with panel agreement ≥70%, with 44 items (84.6%) retained. Specific workforce training targets included the following: empathic validation; effective, respectful, safe communication; and ensuring genuine partnerships in coplanning personalised care. Panellists and health professionals agreed or strongly agreed (95.7% and 95.2%, respectively) that this framework meaningfully reflected the importance in care seeking for pain. More than 74% of health professionals were fairly or extremely confident in their ability to support care priorities for 6 of 9 categories (66.7%). Phase 3: An interdisciplinary panel (n = 5) mapped an existing foundation-level workforce training program against the framework, identifying gaps and training targets. Recommendations were determined for framework adoption to genuinely shape, from a partnership perspective, Australian interdisciplinary pain training. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9578532 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95785322022-10-19 “Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care Slater, Helen Jordan, Joanne E. O'Sullivan, Peter B. Schütze, Robert Goucke, Roger Chua, Jason Browne, Allyson Horgan, Ben De Morgan, Simone Briggs, Andrew M. Pain Research Paper What are the care-seeking priorities of people living with chronic pain and carers and how can these shape interdisciplinary workforce training to improve high-value pain care? Phase 1: Australian people living with chronic pain (n = 206; 90% female) and carers (n = 10; 40% female) described their pain care priorities (eDelphi, round 1). A coding framework was inductively derived from 842 pain care priorities (9 categories, 52 priorities), including validation; communication; multidisciplinary approaches; holistic care; partnerships; practitioner knowledge; self-management; medicines; and diagnosis. Phase 2: In eDelphi round 2, panellists (n = 170; valid responses) rated the importance (1 = less important; 9 = more important) of the represented framework. In parallel, cross-discipline health professionals (n = 267; 75% female) rated the importance of these same priorities. Applying the RAND-UCLA method (panel medians: 1-3: “not important,” 4-6: “equivocal,” or 7-9: “important”), “important” items were retained where the panel median score was >7 with panel agreement ≥70%, with 44 items (84.6%) retained. Specific workforce training targets included the following: empathic validation; effective, respectful, safe communication; and ensuring genuine partnerships in coplanning personalised care. Panellists and health professionals agreed or strongly agreed (95.7% and 95.2%, respectively) that this framework meaningfully reflected the importance in care seeking for pain. More than 74% of health professionals were fairly or extremely confident in their ability to support care priorities for 6 of 9 categories (66.7%). Phase 3: An interdisciplinary panel (n = 5) mapped an existing foundation-level workforce training program against the framework, identifying gaps and training targets. Recommendations were determined for framework adoption to genuinely shape, from a partnership perspective, Australian interdisciplinary pain training. Wolters Kluwer 2022-11 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9578532/ /pubmed/35384928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002647 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Pain. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Slater, Helen Jordan, Joanne E. O'Sullivan, Peter B. Schütze, Robert Goucke, Roger Chua, Jason Browne, Allyson Horgan, Ben De Morgan, Simone Briggs, Andrew M. “Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care |
title | “Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care |
title_full | “Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care |
title_fullStr | “Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care |
title_full_unstemmed | “Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care |
title_short | “Listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care |
title_sort | “listen to me, learn from me”: a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35384928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002647 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT slaterhelen listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare AT jordanjoannee listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare AT osullivanpeterb listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare AT schutzerobert listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare AT gouckeroger listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare AT chuajason listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare AT browneallyson listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare AT horganben listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare AT demorgansimone listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare AT briggsandrewm listentomelearnfrommeaprioritysettingpartnershipforshapinginterdisciplinarypaintrainingtostrengthenchronicpaincare |