Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of multiorgan point-of-care ultrasound compared with pulmonary computed tomographic angiogram in critically ill patients with suspected pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients have a higher incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) than non-critically ill patients, yet no diagnostic algorithm has been validated in this population, leading to the overuse of pulmonary artery computed tomographic angiogram (CTA). This study aimed to comparative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Girardi, Adriana M., Turra, Eduardo E., Loreto, Melina, Albuquerque, Regis, Garcia, Tiago S., Rech, Tatiana H., Gazzana, Marcelo B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36256666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276202
_version_ 1784811994233176064
author Girardi, Adriana M.
Turra, Eduardo E.
Loreto, Melina
Albuquerque, Regis
Garcia, Tiago S.
Rech, Tatiana H.
Gazzana, Marcelo B.
author_facet Girardi, Adriana M.
Turra, Eduardo E.
Loreto, Melina
Albuquerque, Regis
Garcia, Tiago S.
Rech, Tatiana H.
Gazzana, Marcelo B.
author_sort Girardi, Adriana M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients have a higher incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) than non-critically ill patients, yet no diagnostic algorithm has been validated in this population, leading to the overuse of pulmonary artery computed tomographic angiogram (CTA). This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) combined with laboratory data versus CTA in predicting PE in critically ill patients. METHODS: A prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Critically ill patients with suspected acute PE undergoing CTA were prospectively enrolled. Demographic and clinical data were collected from electronic medical records. Blood samples were collected, and the Wells and revised Geneva scores were calculated. Standardized multiorgan POCUS and CTA were performed. The discriminatory power of multiorgan POCUS combined with biochemical markers was tested using ROC curves, and multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were included, and 37 (42%) had PE. Multivariate analysis showed a relative risk (RR) of PE of 2.79 (95% CI, 1.61–4.84) for the presence of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, of 2.54 (95% CI, 0.89–7.20) for D-dimer levels >1000 ng/mL, and of 1.69 (95% CI, 1.12–2.63) for the absence of an alternative diagnosis to PE on lung POCUS or chest radiograph. The combination with the highest diagnostic accuracy for PE included the following variables: 1– POCUS transthoracic echocardiography with evidence of RV dysfunction; 2– lung POCUS or chest radiograph without an alternative diagnosis to PE; and 3– plasma D-dimer levels >1000 ng/mL. Combining these three findings resulted in an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.77–0.94), with 50% sensitivity and 96% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Multiorgan POCUS combined with laboratory data has acceptable diagnostic accuracy for PE compared with CTA. The combined use of these methods might reduce CTA overuse in critically ill patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9578587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95785872022-10-19 Diagnostic accuracy of multiorgan point-of-care ultrasound compared with pulmonary computed tomographic angiogram in critically ill patients with suspected pulmonary embolism Girardi, Adriana M. Turra, Eduardo E. Loreto, Melina Albuquerque, Regis Garcia, Tiago S. Rech, Tatiana H. Gazzana, Marcelo B. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Critically ill patients have a higher incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) than non-critically ill patients, yet no diagnostic algorithm has been validated in this population, leading to the overuse of pulmonary artery computed tomographic angiogram (CTA). This study aimed to comparatively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) combined with laboratory data versus CTA in predicting PE in critically ill patients. METHODS: A prospective diagnostic accuracy study. Critically ill patients with suspected acute PE undergoing CTA were prospectively enrolled. Demographic and clinical data were collected from electronic medical records. Blood samples were collected, and the Wells and revised Geneva scores were calculated. Standardized multiorgan POCUS and CTA were performed. The discriminatory power of multiorgan POCUS combined with biochemical markers was tested using ROC curves, and multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were included, and 37 (42%) had PE. Multivariate analysis showed a relative risk (RR) of PE of 2.79 (95% CI, 1.61–4.84) for the presence of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, of 2.54 (95% CI, 0.89–7.20) for D-dimer levels >1000 ng/mL, and of 1.69 (95% CI, 1.12–2.63) for the absence of an alternative diagnosis to PE on lung POCUS or chest radiograph. The combination with the highest diagnostic accuracy for PE included the following variables: 1– POCUS transthoracic echocardiography with evidence of RV dysfunction; 2– lung POCUS or chest radiograph without an alternative diagnosis to PE; and 3– plasma D-dimer levels >1000 ng/mL. Combining these three findings resulted in an area under the curve of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.77–0.94), with 50% sensitivity and 96% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: Multiorgan POCUS combined with laboratory data has acceptable diagnostic accuracy for PE compared with CTA. The combined use of these methods might reduce CTA overuse in critically ill patients. Public Library of Science 2022-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9578587/ /pubmed/36256666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276202 Text en © 2022 Girardi et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Girardi, Adriana M.
Turra, Eduardo E.
Loreto, Melina
Albuquerque, Regis
Garcia, Tiago S.
Rech, Tatiana H.
Gazzana, Marcelo B.
Diagnostic accuracy of multiorgan point-of-care ultrasound compared with pulmonary computed tomographic angiogram in critically ill patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
title Diagnostic accuracy of multiorgan point-of-care ultrasound compared with pulmonary computed tomographic angiogram in critically ill patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of multiorgan point-of-care ultrasound compared with pulmonary computed tomographic angiogram in critically ill patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of multiorgan point-of-care ultrasound compared with pulmonary computed tomographic angiogram in critically ill patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of multiorgan point-of-care ultrasound compared with pulmonary computed tomographic angiogram in critically ill patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of multiorgan point-of-care ultrasound compared with pulmonary computed tomographic angiogram in critically ill patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of multiorgan point-of-care ultrasound compared with pulmonary computed tomographic angiogram in critically ill patients with suspected pulmonary embolism
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36256666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276202
work_keys_str_mv AT girardiadrianam diagnosticaccuracyofmultiorganpointofcareultrasoundcomparedwithpulmonarycomputedtomographicangiogramincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedpulmonaryembolism
AT turraeduardoe diagnosticaccuracyofmultiorganpointofcareultrasoundcomparedwithpulmonarycomputedtomographicangiogramincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedpulmonaryembolism
AT loretomelina diagnosticaccuracyofmultiorganpointofcareultrasoundcomparedwithpulmonarycomputedtomographicangiogramincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedpulmonaryembolism
AT albuquerqueregis diagnosticaccuracyofmultiorganpointofcareultrasoundcomparedwithpulmonarycomputedtomographicangiogramincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedpulmonaryembolism
AT garciatiagos diagnosticaccuracyofmultiorganpointofcareultrasoundcomparedwithpulmonarycomputedtomographicangiogramincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedpulmonaryembolism
AT rechtatianah diagnosticaccuracyofmultiorganpointofcareultrasoundcomparedwithpulmonarycomputedtomographicangiogramincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedpulmonaryembolism
AT gazzanamarcelob diagnosticaccuracyofmultiorganpointofcareultrasoundcomparedwithpulmonarycomputedtomographicangiogramincriticallyillpatientswithsuspectedpulmonaryembolism