Cargando…

Comparison of alignment and spondylolysis fracture angle in bilateral and unilateral spondylolysis

OBJECTIVES: Spondylolysis occurs bilaterally or unilaterally and bilateral spondylolysis increases the risk of developing isthmic spondylolisthesis. The characteristics of the lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), sacral slope angle (SSA), and spondylolysis fracture angle (SFA) in bilateral spondylolysis com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuzawa, Kanta, Matsui, Tomoyuki, Azuma, Yoshikazu, Miyazaki, Tetsuya, Hiramoto, Machiko, Hashimoto, Ruo, Kida, Noriyuki, Morihara, Toru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36256612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276337
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Spondylolysis occurs bilaterally or unilaterally and bilateral spondylolysis increases the risk of developing isthmic spondylolisthesis. The characteristics of the lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), sacral slope angle (SSA), and spondylolysis fracture angle (SFA) in bilateral spondylolysis compared with those in unilateral spondylolysis have not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to compare the LLA, SSA, and SFA of bilateral and unilateral spondylolysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with lumbar spondylolysis who visited our clinic for an initial visit and 15 age-matched patients with a chief complaint of low back pain were included as controls. Computed tomography films were used to classify all spondylolysis patients into two groups: those with bilateral fractures (bilateral) and those with unilateral fractures (unilateral). The LLA and SSA were measured using lateral X-ray films and the SFA was measured using computed tomography films. RESULTS: The LLA was significantly higher in all spondylolysis patients than in the control group (p = .026). There was no significant difference in SSA between the spondylolysis and control groups (p = .28). The LLA was significantly higher in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group (p = .018). There was no significant difference in SSA between the bilateral and unilateral groups (p = .15). The SFA was significantly lower in the bilateral group than in the unilateral group (p = .024). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that physical therapy for spondylolysis may be considered bilaterally and unilaterally.