Cargando…

A Randomized Comparison of Clothing Removal Techniques in a Simulated Trauma Patient Exposure

Introduction Trauma shears are commonly used by emergency medical services (EMS) providers to remove clothing from patients and expose underlying traumatic injuries. Other tools exist that may be more effective, but they are largely untested. This study compared the use of trauma shears versus two c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cummings, Caleb, Sibley, Aaron, Jain, Trevor, Nicholson, Brent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277566
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29237
_version_ 1784812009812918272
author Cummings, Caleb
Sibley, Aaron
Jain, Trevor
Nicholson, Brent
author_facet Cummings, Caleb
Sibley, Aaron
Jain, Trevor
Nicholson, Brent
author_sort Cummings, Caleb
collection PubMed
description Introduction Trauma shears are commonly used by emergency medical services (EMS) providers to remove clothing from patients and expose underlying traumatic injuries. Other tools exist that may be more effective, but they are largely untested. This study compared the use of trauma shears versus two cutting hooks in removing clothing from a simulated trauma patient. Methods We recruited 18 paramedic students to participate in a cross-over study designed to remove clothing from a wholly dressed full-body training mannequin using trauma shears (with the cut-and-rip (CAR) technique) and two cutting hooks (S-Cut QE (ES Equipment AB, Nol, Sweden) and the Talon Rescue Emergency Clothing Knife (TRECK+, Talon Rescue, Farmington, CT, USA)). We determined the order of the tools using a three-by-three Latin square and randomized participants equally between possible orders to minimize carryover effects. We recorded times for total clothing removal and the removal of clothing from the upper and lower body, respectively. We employed a mixed-effects analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine any differences between tools. Results Removal time was significantly faster with the S-Cut QE compared to the CAR technique and TRECK+ (mean 78 seconds, 95% confidence interval (CI) 52-103 vs. 142 seconds, 95% CI 117-167, vs. 209 seconds, 95% CI 184-235, p<0.001). The S-Cut QE was significantly faster than the CAR technique and TRECK+ for upper body clothing removal (mean 47 seconds, 95% CI 30-64 vs. 92 seconds, 95% CI 75-109, vs. 131 seconds, 95% CI 115-148, p<0.001) and the S-Cut QE and CAR were significantly faster than TRECK+ for lower body clothing removal (mean 25 seconds, 95% CI 11-38 and 44 seconds, 95% CI 31-58 vs. 71 seconds, 95% CI 58-85, p<0.001). Most (78%) participants preferred the S-Cut QE over other tools. Conclusion The S-Cut QE removed clothing from a simulated trauma patient faster than both the CAR and TRECK+. Emergency medical services (EMS) agencies should consider adding a cutting hook to their standard trauma kit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9578655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95786552022-10-20 A Randomized Comparison of Clothing Removal Techniques in a Simulated Trauma Patient Exposure Cummings, Caleb Sibley, Aaron Jain, Trevor Nicholson, Brent Cureus Emergency Medicine Introduction Trauma shears are commonly used by emergency medical services (EMS) providers to remove clothing from patients and expose underlying traumatic injuries. Other tools exist that may be more effective, but they are largely untested. This study compared the use of trauma shears versus two cutting hooks in removing clothing from a simulated trauma patient. Methods We recruited 18 paramedic students to participate in a cross-over study designed to remove clothing from a wholly dressed full-body training mannequin using trauma shears (with the cut-and-rip (CAR) technique) and two cutting hooks (S-Cut QE (ES Equipment AB, Nol, Sweden) and the Talon Rescue Emergency Clothing Knife (TRECK+, Talon Rescue, Farmington, CT, USA)). We determined the order of the tools using a three-by-three Latin square and randomized participants equally between possible orders to minimize carryover effects. We recorded times for total clothing removal and the removal of clothing from the upper and lower body, respectively. We employed a mixed-effects analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine any differences between tools. Results Removal time was significantly faster with the S-Cut QE compared to the CAR technique and TRECK+ (mean 78 seconds, 95% confidence interval (CI) 52-103 vs. 142 seconds, 95% CI 117-167, vs. 209 seconds, 95% CI 184-235, p<0.001). The S-Cut QE was significantly faster than the CAR technique and TRECK+ for upper body clothing removal (mean 47 seconds, 95% CI 30-64 vs. 92 seconds, 95% CI 75-109, vs. 131 seconds, 95% CI 115-148, p<0.001) and the S-Cut QE and CAR were significantly faster than TRECK+ for lower body clothing removal (mean 25 seconds, 95% CI 11-38 and 44 seconds, 95% CI 31-58 vs. 71 seconds, 95% CI 58-85, p<0.001). Most (78%) participants preferred the S-Cut QE over other tools. Conclusion The S-Cut QE removed clothing from a simulated trauma patient faster than both the CAR and TRECK+. Emergency medical services (EMS) agencies should consider adding a cutting hook to their standard trauma kit. Cureus 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9578655/ /pubmed/36277566 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29237 Text en Copyright © 2022, Cummings et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Cummings, Caleb
Sibley, Aaron
Jain, Trevor
Nicholson, Brent
A Randomized Comparison of Clothing Removal Techniques in a Simulated Trauma Patient Exposure
title A Randomized Comparison of Clothing Removal Techniques in a Simulated Trauma Patient Exposure
title_full A Randomized Comparison of Clothing Removal Techniques in a Simulated Trauma Patient Exposure
title_fullStr A Randomized Comparison of Clothing Removal Techniques in a Simulated Trauma Patient Exposure
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Comparison of Clothing Removal Techniques in a Simulated Trauma Patient Exposure
title_short A Randomized Comparison of Clothing Removal Techniques in a Simulated Trauma Patient Exposure
title_sort randomized comparison of clothing removal techniques in a simulated trauma patient exposure
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277566
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29237
work_keys_str_mv AT cummingscaleb arandomizedcomparisonofclothingremovaltechniquesinasimulatedtraumapatientexposure
AT sibleyaaron arandomizedcomparisonofclothingremovaltechniquesinasimulatedtraumapatientexposure
AT jaintrevor arandomizedcomparisonofclothingremovaltechniquesinasimulatedtraumapatientexposure
AT nicholsonbrent arandomizedcomparisonofclothingremovaltechniquesinasimulatedtraumapatientexposure
AT cummingscaleb randomizedcomparisonofclothingremovaltechniquesinasimulatedtraumapatientexposure
AT sibleyaaron randomizedcomparisonofclothingremovaltechniquesinasimulatedtraumapatientexposure
AT jaintrevor randomizedcomparisonofclothingremovaltechniquesinasimulatedtraumapatientexposure
AT nicholsonbrent randomizedcomparisonofclothingremovaltechniquesinasimulatedtraumapatientexposure