Cargando…

The Impact of Parameter Selection and Setup Conditions on Image Quality of an On-Board Helical Kilovoltage Computed Tomography System

Purpose To evaluate the imaging performance of an on-board helical kilovoltage computed tomography (kVCT) system mounted on a helical tomotherapy unit for various imaging parameters and setup conditions. Methods Images of a commonly used computed tomography (CT) image quality phantom were acquired w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tegtmeier, Riley C, Ferris, William S, Bayouth, John E, Culberson, Wesley S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277579
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29244
_version_ 1784812012729008128
author Tegtmeier, Riley C
Ferris, William S
Bayouth, John E
Culberson, Wesley S
author_facet Tegtmeier, Riley C
Ferris, William S
Bayouth, John E
Culberson, Wesley S
author_sort Tegtmeier, Riley C
collection PubMed
description Purpose To evaluate the imaging performance of an on-board helical kilovoltage computed tomography (kVCT) system mounted on a helical tomotherapy unit for various imaging parameters and setup conditions. Methods Images of a commonly used computed tomography (CT) image quality phantom were acquired while varying the selection of available parameters (anatomy, mode, body size) as well as phantom positioning and size. Image quality metrics (IQM) including noise, uniformity, contrast, CT number constancy, and spatial resolution were compared for parameter and setup variations.  Results The use of fine mode improved noise and contrast metrics by 20-30% compared to normal mode and by nearly a factor of two compared to the coarse mode for otherwise identical protocols. Uniformity, CT number constancy, and spatial resolution were also improved for fine mode. Thorax and pelvis anatomy protocols improved noise, uniformity, and contrast metrics by 10-20% compared to images acquired with head protocols. No significant differences in CT number constancy or spatial resolution were observed regardless of anatomy choice. Increasing body size (milliampere second (mAs)/rotation) improved each image quality metric. Vertical and lateral phantom shifts of up to ±6 cm degraded noise and contrast metrics by up to 30% relative to the isocenter while also worsening uniformity and CT number constancy. IQM were also degraded substantially with the use of annuli to increase the phantom diameter (32 cm vs. 20 cm). Despite variations in image characteristics among the investigated changes, most metrics were within manufacturer specifications when applicable. Conclusion This work demonstrates the dependence of image quality on parameter selection and setup conditions for a helical kVCT system utilized in image-guided and adaptive helical tomotherapy treatments. While the overall image quality is robust to variations in imaging parameters, care should be taken when selecting parameters as patient size increases or positioning moves from the isocenter to ensure adequate image quality is still achieved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9578666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95786662022-10-20 The Impact of Parameter Selection and Setup Conditions on Image Quality of an On-Board Helical Kilovoltage Computed Tomography System Tegtmeier, Riley C Ferris, William S Bayouth, John E Culberson, Wesley S Cureus Medical Physics Purpose To evaluate the imaging performance of an on-board helical kilovoltage computed tomography (kVCT) system mounted on a helical tomotherapy unit for various imaging parameters and setup conditions. Methods Images of a commonly used computed tomography (CT) image quality phantom were acquired while varying the selection of available parameters (anatomy, mode, body size) as well as phantom positioning and size. Image quality metrics (IQM) including noise, uniformity, contrast, CT number constancy, and spatial resolution were compared for parameter and setup variations.  Results The use of fine mode improved noise and contrast metrics by 20-30% compared to normal mode and by nearly a factor of two compared to the coarse mode for otherwise identical protocols. Uniformity, CT number constancy, and spatial resolution were also improved for fine mode. Thorax and pelvis anatomy protocols improved noise, uniformity, and contrast metrics by 10-20% compared to images acquired with head protocols. No significant differences in CT number constancy or spatial resolution were observed regardless of anatomy choice. Increasing body size (milliampere second (mAs)/rotation) improved each image quality metric. Vertical and lateral phantom shifts of up to ±6 cm degraded noise and contrast metrics by up to 30% relative to the isocenter while also worsening uniformity and CT number constancy. IQM were also degraded substantially with the use of annuli to increase the phantom diameter (32 cm vs. 20 cm). Despite variations in image characteristics among the investigated changes, most metrics were within manufacturer specifications when applicable. Conclusion This work demonstrates the dependence of image quality on parameter selection and setup conditions for a helical kVCT system utilized in image-guided and adaptive helical tomotherapy treatments. While the overall image quality is robust to variations in imaging parameters, care should be taken when selecting parameters as patient size increases or positioning moves from the isocenter to ensure adequate image quality is still achieved. Cureus 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9578666/ /pubmed/36277579 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29244 Text en Copyright © 2022, Tegtmeier et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Physics
Tegtmeier, Riley C
Ferris, William S
Bayouth, John E
Culberson, Wesley S
The Impact of Parameter Selection and Setup Conditions on Image Quality of an On-Board Helical Kilovoltage Computed Tomography System
title The Impact of Parameter Selection and Setup Conditions on Image Quality of an On-Board Helical Kilovoltage Computed Tomography System
title_full The Impact of Parameter Selection and Setup Conditions on Image Quality of an On-Board Helical Kilovoltage Computed Tomography System
title_fullStr The Impact of Parameter Selection and Setup Conditions on Image Quality of an On-Board Helical Kilovoltage Computed Tomography System
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Parameter Selection and Setup Conditions on Image Quality of an On-Board Helical Kilovoltage Computed Tomography System
title_short The Impact of Parameter Selection and Setup Conditions on Image Quality of an On-Board Helical Kilovoltage Computed Tomography System
title_sort impact of parameter selection and setup conditions on image quality of an on-board helical kilovoltage computed tomography system
topic Medical Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277579
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29244
work_keys_str_mv AT tegtmeierrileyc theimpactofparameterselectionandsetupconditionsonimagequalityofanonboardhelicalkilovoltagecomputedtomographysystem
AT ferriswilliams theimpactofparameterselectionandsetupconditionsonimagequalityofanonboardhelicalkilovoltagecomputedtomographysystem
AT bayouthjohne theimpactofparameterselectionandsetupconditionsonimagequalityofanonboardhelicalkilovoltagecomputedtomographysystem
AT culbersonwesleys theimpactofparameterselectionandsetupconditionsonimagequalityofanonboardhelicalkilovoltagecomputedtomographysystem
AT tegtmeierrileyc impactofparameterselectionandsetupconditionsonimagequalityofanonboardhelicalkilovoltagecomputedtomographysystem
AT ferriswilliams impactofparameterselectionandsetupconditionsonimagequalityofanonboardhelicalkilovoltagecomputedtomographysystem
AT bayouthjohne impactofparameterselectionandsetupconditionsonimagequalityofanonboardhelicalkilovoltagecomputedtomographysystem
AT culbersonwesleys impactofparameterselectionandsetupconditionsonimagequalityofanonboardhelicalkilovoltagecomputedtomographysystem