Cargando…

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the temporary spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) in treating postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). METHODS: From September 1, 2019, to May 30, 2020, 44 PHN patients admitted to the Pain Depart...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiaohong, Chen, Pan, He, Jian, Huang, Xiang, Tang, Dacheng, Chen, Lumiao, Wang, Xiaoping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36267666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3880424
_version_ 1784812069164417024
author Li, Xiaohong
Chen, Pan
He, Jian
Huang, Xiang
Tang, Dacheng
Chen, Lumiao
Wang, Xiaoping
author_facet Li, Xiaohong
Chen, Pan
He, Jian
Huang, Xiang
Tang, Dacheng
Chen, Lumiao
Wang, Xiaoping
author_sort Li, Xiaohong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the temporary spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) in treating postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). METHODS: From September 1, 2019, to May 30, 2020, 44 PHN patients admitted to the Pain Department of the Foshan First People's Hospital, China were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to SCS and PRF groups in a ratio of 1 : 1 and were given respective therapy for 8 days. Rash, in all patients, was located in the trunk and extremities of the spinal nerve (C4-L5), and the pain intensity was greater than or equal to 7 points on the VAS scale. Subsequently, we evaluated the visual analogue scale (VAS), efficiency rate (ER), complete remission rate (CRR), daily sleep interference score (SIS), patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), generalized anxiety disorder assessment (GAD-7), bodily pain (BP), and physical function (PF) sections of the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) at the following time points: presurgery, as well as 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postsurgery. RESULTS: The final analysis was performed on 40 patients (n = 20 SCS cohort, and n = 20 PRF cohort). Both cohorts exhibited comparable baseline values (P > 0 : 05). Particularly, they were similar in age, sex, pain duration, involved dermatome, and comorbidity. Among the variables that demonstrated marked improvements from presurgical data to 1 week postsurgery were VAS, ER, CRR, SIS, PHQ-9, GAD-7, as well as BP and PF of the SF-36 in both cohorts. In addition, this improvement persisted for 6 months. There was no complication related to surgery in any of our patients. CONCLUSION: Based on our analysis, SCS exhibited better efficacy and safety than PRF. This study was prospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100050647).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9578922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95789222022-10-19 Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Li, Xiaohong Chen, Pan He, Jian Huang, Xiang Tang, Dacheng Chen, Lumiao Wang, Xiaoping Pain Res Manag Research Article OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the temporary spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) in treating postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). METHODS: From September 1, 2019, to May 30, 2020, 44 PHN patients admitted to the Pain Department of the Foshan First People's Hospital, China were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to SCS and PRF groups in a ratio of 1 : 1 and were given respective therapy for 8 days. Rash, in all patients, was located in the trunk and extremities of the spinal nerve (C4-L5), and the pain intensity was greater than or equal to 7 points on the VAS scale. Subsequently, we evaluated the visual analogue scale (VAS), efficiency rate (ER), complete remission rate (CRR), daily sleep interference score (SIS), patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), generalized anxiety disorder assessment (GAD-7), bodily pain (BP), and physical function (PF) sections of the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) at the following time points: presurgery, as well as 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postsurgery. RESULTS: The final analysis was performed on 40 patients (n = 20 SCS cohort, and n = 20 PRF cohort). Both cohorts exhibited comparable baseline values (P > 0 : 05). Particularly, they were similar in age, sex, pain duration, involved dermatome, and comorbidity. Among the variables that demonstrated marked improvements from presurgical data to 1 week postsurgery were VAS, ER, CRR, SIS, PHQ-9, GAD-7, as well as BP and PF of the SF-36 in both cohorts. In addition, this improvement persisted for 6 months. There was no complication related to surgery in any of our patients. CONCLUSION: Based on our analysis, SCS exhibited better efficacy and safety than PRF. This study was prospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100050647). Hindawi 2022-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9578922/ /pubmed/36267666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3880424 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xiaohong Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Xiaohong
Chen, Pan
He, Jian
Huang, Xiang
Tang, Dacheng
Chen, Lumiao
Wang, Xiaoping
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety of temporary spinal cord stimulation versus pulsed radiofrequency for postherpetic neuralgia: a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36267666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3880424
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaohong comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftemporaryspinalcordstimulationversuspulsedradiofrequencyforpostherpeticneuralgiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenpan comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftemporaryspinalcordstimulationversuspulsedradiofrequencyforpostherpeticneuralgiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hejian comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftemporaryspinalcordstimulationversuspulsedradiofrequencyforpostherpeticneuralgiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT huangxiang comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftemporaryspinalcordstimulationversuspulsedradiofrequencyforpostherpeticneuralgiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tangdacheng comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftemporaryspinalcordstimulationversuspulsedradiofrequencyforpostherpeticneuralgiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chenlumiao comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftemporaryspinalcordstimulationversuspulsedradiofrequencyforpostherpeticneuralgiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangxiaoping comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftemporaryspinalcordstimulationversuspulsedradiofrequencyforpostherpeticneuralgiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial