Cargando…
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the temporary spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) in treating postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). METHODS: From September 1, 2019, to May 30, 2020, 44 PHN patients admitted to the Pain Depart...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36267666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3880424 |
_version_ | 1784812069164417024 |
---|---|
author | Li, Xiaohong Chen, Pan He, Jian Huang, Xiang Tang, Dacheng Chen, Lumiao Wang, Xiaoping |
author_facet | Li, Xiaohong Chen, Pan He, Jian Huang, Xiang Tang, Dacheng Chen, Lumiao Wang, Xiaoping |
author_sort | Li, Xiaohong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the temporary spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) in treating postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). METHODS: From September 1, 2019, to May 30, 2020, 44 PHN patients admitted to the Pain Department of the Foshan First People's Hospital, China were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to SCS and PRF groups in a ratio of 1 : 1 and were given respective therapy for 8 days. Rash, in all patients, was located in the trunk and extremities of the spinal nerve (C4-L5), and the pain intensity was greater than or equal to 7 points on the VAS scale. Subsequently, we evaluated the visual analogue scale (VAS), efficiency rate (ER), complete remission rate (CRR), daily sleep interference score (SIS), patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), generalized anxiety disorder assessment (GAD-7), bodily pain (BP), and physical function (PF) sections of the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) at the following time points: presurgery, as well as 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postsurgery. RESULTS: The final analysis was performed on 40 patients (n = 20 SCS cohort, and n = 20 PRF cohort). Both cohorts exhibited comparable baseline values (P > 0 : 05). Particularly, they were similar in age, sex, pain duration, involved dermatome, and comorbidity. Among the variables that demonstrated marked improvements from presurgical data to 1 week postsurgery were VAS, ER, CRR, SIS, PHQ-9, GAD-7, as well as BP and PF of the SF-36 in both cohorts. In addition, this improvement persisted for 6 months. There was no complication related to surgery in any of our patients. CONCLUSION: Based on our analysis, SCS exhibited better efficacy and safety than PRF. This study was prospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100050647). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9578922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95789222022-10-19 Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Li, Xiaohong Chen, Pan He, Jian Huang, Xiang Tang, Dacheng Chen, Lumiao Wang, Xiaoping Pain Res Manag Research Article OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the temporary spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) in treating postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). METHODS: From September 1, 2019, to May 30, 2020, 44 PHN patients admitted to the Pain Department of the Foshan First People's Hospital, China were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to SCS and PRF groups in a ratio of 1 : 1 and were given respective therapy for 8 days. Rash, in all patients, was located in the trunk and extremities of the spinal nerve (C4-L5), and the pain intensity was greater than or equal to 7 points on the VAS scale. Subsequently, we evaluated the visual analogue scale (VAS), efficiency rate (ER), complete remission rate (CRR), daily sleep interference score (SIS), patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), generalized anxiety disorder assessment (GAD-7), bodily pain (BP), and physical function (PF) sections of the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) at the following time points: presurgery, as well as 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postsurgery. RESULTS: The final analysis was performed on 40 patients (n = 20 SCS cohort, and n = 20 PRF cohort). Both cohorts exhibited comparable baseline values (P > 0 : 05). Particularly, they were similar in age, sex, pain duration, involved dermatome, and comorbidity. Among the variables that demonstrated marked improvements from presurgical data to 1 week postsurgery were VAS, ER, CRR, SIS, PHQ-9, GAD-7, as well as BP and PF of the SF-36 in both cohorts. In addition, this improvement persisted for 6 months. There was no complication related to surgery in any of our patients. CONCLUSION: Based on our analysis, SCS exhibited better efficacy and safety than PRF. This study was prospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100050647). Hindawi 2022-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9578922/ /pubmed/36267666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3880424 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xiaohong Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Xiaohong Chen, Pan He, Jian Huang, Xiang Tang, Dacheng Chen, Lumiao Wang, Xiaoping Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | comparison of the efficacy and safety of temporary spinal cord stimulation versus pulsed radiofrequency for postherpetic neuralgia: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9578922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36267666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3880424 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lixiaohong comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftemporaryspinalcordstimulationversuspulsedradiofrequencyforpostherpeticneuralgiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenpan comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftemporaryspinalcordstimulationversuspulsedradiofrequencyforpostherpeticneuralgiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hejian comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftemporaryspinalcordstimulationversuspulsedradiofrequencyforpostherpeticneuralgiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT huangxiang comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftemporaryspinalcordstimulationversuspulsedradiofrequencyforpostherpeticneuralgiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tangdacheng comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftemporaryspinalcordstimulationversuspulsedradiofrequencyforpostherpeticneuralgiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenlumiao comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftemporaryspinalcordstimulationversuspulsedradiofrequencyforpostherpeticneuralgiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangxiaoping comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyoftemporaryspinalcordstimulationversuspulsedradiofrequencyforpostherpeticneuralgiaaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial |