Cargando…

The Importance of Signal Strength Index in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography: A Study of Eyes with Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of the signal strength index (SSI) on a comparison of the vascular and structural OCT measurements between eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PXF) and healthy controls of Asian-Indian origin. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 33 eyes of 33 PXF patients and 40...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pradhan, Zia Sultan, Sreenivasaiah, Shruthi, Srinivasan, Thanemozhi, Shroff, Sujani, Devi, Sathi, Rao, Dhanaraj A S, Webers, Carroll A B, Puttaiah, Narendra K, Rao, Harsha Laxmana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36274675
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S378722
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of the signal strength index (SSI) on a comparison of the vascular and structural OCT measurements between eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PXF) and healthy controls of Asian-Indian origin. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 33 eyes of 33 PXF patients and 40 healthy eyes of 40 controls underwent OCT and OCT angiography (OCTA). Eyes with intraocular pressure (IOP) >21mmHg, glaucomatous disc changes, or any other ocular pathology were excluded. Peripapillary vessel density (VD) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness were determined from the optic disc scans. Parafoveal VD and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness were measured from the macular scans. These parameters were compared between the groups using mixed effect models after adjusting for clinical confounders such as IOP, as well as SSI of the scans. RESULTS: The 2 groups were demographically similar. Average RNFL (94µm vs 100µm, p = 0.01) and GCC (91µm vs 95µm, p = 0.03) were thinner in the PXF group compared to controls. The average peripapillary VD appeared lower in the PXF groups compared to controls (58.2% vs 58.8%, p = 0.04), but after adjusting for IOP and SSI, no difference was noted (p = 0.39). After accounting for confounders, parafoveal VD in the PXF group was significantly lower compared to controls (44.3% vs 46.8%, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Peripapillary RNFL thickness, parafoveal GCC thickness and parafoveal VD were decreased in eyes with PXF when compared to controls. VD measurements are associated with the SSI and, therefore, clinicians and researchers evaluating OCTA scans quantitatively must consider the SSI value during analysis and interpretation.