Cargando…
In a Child’s Shoes: Composite Time Trade-Off Valuations for EQ-5D-Y-3L with Different Proxy Perspectives
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EQ-5D-Y-3L health states are commonly valued by asking adults to complete stated preference tasks, ‘given their views about a 10-year-old child’ (hereafter referred to as proxy 1). The use of this perspective has been a source of debate. In this paper, we investigated an a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36255560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01202-1 |
_version_ | 1784812221124050944 |
---|---|
author | Lipman, Stefan A. Essers, Brigitte A. B. Finch, Aureliano P. Sajjad, Ayesha Stalmeier, Peep F. M. Roudijk, Bram |
author_facet | Lipman, Stefan A. Essers, Brigitte A. B. Finch, Aureliano P. Sajjad, Ayesha Stalmeier, Peep F. M. Roudijk, Bram |
author_sort | Lipman, Stefan A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EQ-5D-Y-3L health states are commonly valued by asking adults to complete stated preference tasks, ‘given their views about a 10-year-old child’ (hereafter referred to as proxy 1). The use of this perspective has been a source of debate. In this paper, we investigated an alternative proxy perspective: i.e. adults considered what they think a 10-year old-child would decide for itself (hereafter, proxy 2 (substitute)]. Our main objective was to explore how the outcomes, dispersion and response patterns of a composite time trade-off valuation differ between proxy 1 and proxy 2. METHODS: A team of four trained interviewers completed 402 composite time trade-off interviews following the EQ-5D-Y-3L protocol. Respondents were randomly allocated to value health states in either the proxy 1 or proxy 2 (substitute) perspective. Each respondent valued ten health states with the perspective they were assigned to, as well as one health state with the alternative perspective (33333). RESULTS: The use of different proxy perspectives yielded differences in EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation. For states in which children had considerable pain and were very worried, sad or unhappy, respondents’ valuations were lower in proxy 1 than in proxy 2 (substitute) perspectives, by about 0.2. Within-subject variation across health states was lower for proxy 2 (substitute) than proxy 1 perspectives. Analyses of response patterns suggest that data for proxy 2 (substitute) perspectives were less clustered. CONCLUSIONS: There are systematic differences between composite time trade-off responses given by adults deciding for children and adults considering what children would want for themselves. In addition to warranting further qualitative exploration, such differences contribute to the ongoing normative discussion surrounding the source and perspective used for valuation of child and adolescent health. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40273-022-01202-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9579618 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95796182022-10-19 In a Child’s Shoes: Composite Time Trade-Off Valuations for EQ-5D-Y-3L with Different Proxy Perspectives Lipman, Stefan A. Essers, Brigitte A. B. Finch, Aureliano P. Sajjad, Ayesha Stalmeier, Peep F. M. Roudijk, Bram Pharmacoeconomics Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EQ-5D-Y-3L health states are commonly valued by asking adults to complete stated preference tasks, ‘given their views about a 10-year-old child’ (hereafter referred to as proxy 1). The use of this perspective has been a source of debate. In this paper, we investigated an alternative proxy perspective: i.e. adults considered what they think a 10-year old-child would decide for itself (hereafter, proxy 2 (substitute)]. Our main objective was to explore how the outcomes, dispersion and response patterns of a composite time trade-off valuation differ between proxy 1 and proxy 2. METHODS: A team of four trained interviewers completed 402 composite time trade-off interviews following the EQ-5D-Y-3L protocol. Respondents were randomly allocated to value health states in either the proxy 1 or proxy 2 (substitute) perspective. Each respondent valued ten health states with the perspective they were assigned to, as well as one health state with the alternative perspective (33333). RESULTS: The use of different proxy perspectives yielded differences in EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation. For states in which children had considerable pain and were very worried, sad or unhappy, respondents’ valuations were lower in proxy 1 than in proxy 2 (substitute) perspectives, by about 0.2. Within-subject variation across health states was lower for proxy 2 (substitute) than proxy 1 perspectives. Analyses of response patterns suggest that data for proxy 2 (substitute) perspectives were less clustered. CONCLUSIONS: There are systematic differences between composite time trade-off responses given by adults deciding for children and adults considering what children would want for themselves. In addition to warranting further qualitative exploration, such differences contribute to the ongoing normative discussion surrounding the source and perspective used for valuation of child and adolescent health. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40273-022-01202-1. Springer International Publishing 2022-10-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9579618/ /pubmed/36255560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01202-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Lipman, Stefan A. Essers, Brigitte A. B. Finch, Aureliano P. Sajjad, Ayesha Stalmeier, Peep F. M. Roudijk, Bram In a Child’s Shoes: Composite Time Trade-Off Valuations for EQ-5D-Y-3L with Different Proxy Perspectives |
title | In a Child’s Shoes: Composite Time Trade-Off Valuations for EQ-5D-Y-3L with Different Proxy Perspectives |
title_full | In a Child’s Shoes: Composite Time Trade-Off Valuations for EQ-5D-Y-3L with Different Proxy Perspectives |
title_fullStr | In a Child’s Shoes: Composite Time Trade-Off Valuations for EQ-5D-Y-3L with Different Proxy Perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | In a Child’s Shoes: Composite Time Trade-Off Valuations for EQ-5D-Y-3L with Different Proxy Perspectives |
title_short | In a Child’s Shoes: Composite Time Trade-Off Valuations for EQ-5D-Y-3L with Different Proxy Perspectives |
title_sort | in a child’s shoes: composite time trade-off valuations for eq-5d-y-3l with different proxy perspectives |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579618/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36255560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01202-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lipmanstefana inachildsshoescompositetimetradeoffvaluationsforeq5dy3lwithdifferentproxyperspectives AT essersbrigitteab inachildsshoescompositetimetradeoffvaluationsforeq5dy3lwithdifferentproxyperspectives AT finchaurelianop inachildsshoescompositetimetradeoffvaluationsforeq5dy3lwithdifferentproxyperspectives AT sajjadayesha inachildsshoescompositetimetradeoffvaluationsforeq5dy3lwithdifferentproxyperspectives AT stalmeierpeepfm inachildsshoescompositetimetradeoffvaluationsforeq5dy3lwithdifferentproxyperspectives AT roudijkbram inachildsshoescompositetimetradeoffvaluationsforeq5dy3lwithdifferentproxyperspectives |