Reimplantation versus aortic ring annuloplasty in bicuspid valve with borderline aortic root ectasia

OBJECTIVE: Bicuspid aortic valve repair can be achieved with the reimplantation technique or external ring annuloplasty. Reimplantation could be an “overtreatment” in nonaneurysmatic aortic roots. External ring repair, on the contrary, could be an “undertreatment” in dilated roots. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the 2 techniques in patients with borderline aortic root dimensions, analyzing early results, aortic regurgitation recurrence, and root dilation over time. METHODS: We selected patients with bicuspid aortic valve and ectasia of the aortic root (40-48 mm) who underwent reimplantation or external ring repair. We compared the 2 techniques, analyzing immediate postoperative and follow-up echocardiography. Only patients with at least 1 year of follow-up were included. RESULTS: We obtained 2 groups of 21 patients (reimplantation) and 22 patients (external ring). Median follow-up time was 36 (40) months. There were no deaths during the follow-up periods. Three patients required reoperation in the external ring group because of recurrent aortic regurgitation, with a freedom from reoperation of 77.8% at 7 years (no reoperation was required in the reimplantation group). In the external ring group, we observed an immediate postoperative root diameter reduction and no significative expansion during follow-up (+0.4 mm/year, P = .184). CONCLUSIONS: Excellent results of reimplantation technique are confirmed and stable over time. Root diameter seems to remain stable over time when external ring technique was performed. The greater incidence of reoperation after external ring could be due to the progressive learning curve (256 patients vs 52 patients). Longer follow-up studies are needed.