Cargando…

Effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Permanent bilateral hearing loss (PBHL) is a serious condition in newborns, with a prevalence of at least one per 1000 live births. However, there has been no recent systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening programs (UNHS). METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edmond, Karen, Chadha, Shelly, Hunnicutt, Cynthia, Strobel, Natalie, Manchaiah, Vinaya, Yoshinga-Itano, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society of Global Health 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36259421
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.12006
_version_ 1784812267529830400
author Edmond, Karen
Chadha, Shelly
Hunnicutt, Cynthia
Strobel, Natalie
Manchaiah, Vinaya
Yoshinga-Itano, Christine
author_facet Edmond, Karen
Chadha, Shelly
Hunnicutt, Cynthia
Strobel, Natalie
Manchaiah, Vinaya
Yoshinga-Itano, Christine
author_sort Edmond, Karen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Permanent bilateral hearing loss (PBHL) is a serious condition in newborns, with a prevalence of at least one per 1000 live births. However, there has been no recent systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening programs (UNHS). METHODS: We registered our study protocol on PROSPERO CRD42020175451. Primary outcomes were any identification of PBHL (ie, PBHL diagnosed at any time), age of identification of PBHL, and neurodevelopment. Two reviewers searched standard databases to March 2022 and extracted data. We used fixed and random effects meta-analysis to pool data and graded the certainty of evidence using standard methods. RESULTS: The search retrieved 2834 records. We identified five studies reporting on the effects of UNHS vs no UNHS in 1 023 610 newborns. The relative risk of being identified with PBHL before nine months in infants with UNHS compared to infants without UNHS was 3.28 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.84, 5.85, one study, 1 023 497 newborns, low certainty evidence). The mean difference in the age of identification of PBHL in infants with UNHS compared to infants without UNHS was 13.2 months earlier (95% CI = -26.3, -0.01, two studies, 197 newborns, very low certainty evidence). The relative risk of infants eventually being identified with PBHL in infants with UNHS compared to infants without UNHS was 1.01 (95% CI = 0.89, 1.14, three studies, 1 023 497 newborns, low certainty evidence). At the latest follow-up at 3-8 years, the standardised mean difference (SMD) in receptive language development between infants with UNHS compared to infants without UNHS was 0.60 z scores (95% CI = 0.07, 1.13, one study, 101 children, low certainty evidence) and the mean difference in developmental quotients was 7.72 (95% CI = -0.03, 15.47, three studies, 334 children, very low certainty evidence). The SMD in expressive language development was 0.39 z scores (95% CI = -0.20, 0.97, one study, 87 children, low certainty evidence) and the mean difference in developmental quotients was 10.10 scores (95% CI = 1.47, 18.73, 3 studies, 334 children, very low certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS: UNHS programs result in earlier identification of PBHL and may improve neurodevelopment. UNHS should be implemented across high-, middle-, and low-income countries. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020175451)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9579831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher International Society of Global Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95798312022-10-21 Effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis Edmond, Karen Chadha, Shelly Hunnicutt, Cynthia Strobel, Natalie Manchaiah, Vinaya Yoshinga-Itano, Christine J Glob Health Research Theme 8: Global evidence for postnatal care of newborns BACKGROUND: Permanent bilateral hearing loss (PBHL) is a serious condition in newborns, with a prevalence of at least one per 1000 live births. However, there has been no recent systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening programs (UNHS). METHODS: We registered our study protocol on PROSPERO CRD42020175451. Primary outcomes were any identification of PBHL (ie, PBHL diagnosed at any time), age of identification of PBHL, and neurodevelopment. Two reviewers searched standard databases to March 2022 and extracted data. We used fixed and random effects meta-analysis to pool data and graded the certainty of evidence using standard methods. RESULTS: The search retrieved 2834 records. We identified five studies reporting on the effects of UNHS vs no UNHS in 1 023 610 newborns. The relative risk of being identified with PBHL before nine months in infants with UNHS compared to infants without UNHS was 3.28 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.84, 5.85, one study, 1 023 497 newborns, low certainty evidence). The mean difference in the age of identification of PBHL in infants with UNHS compared to infants without UNHS was 13.2 months earlier (95% CI = -26.3, -0.01, two studies, 197 newborns, very low certainty evidence). The relative risk of infants eventually being identified with PBHL in infants with UNHS compared to infants without UNHS was 1.01 (95% CI = 0.89, 1.14, three studies, 1 023 497 newborns, low certainty evidence). At the latest follow-up at 3-8 years, the standardised mean difference (SMD) in receptive language development between infants with UNHS compared to infants without UNHS was 0.60 z scores (95% CI = 0.07, 1.13, one study, 101 children, low certainty evidence) and the mean difference in developmental quotients was 7.72 (95% CI = -0.03, 15.47, three studies, 334 children, very low certainty evidence). The SMD in expressive language development was 0.39 z scores (95% CI = -0.20, 0.97, one study, 87 children, low certainty evidence) and the mean difference in developmental quotients was 10.10 scores (95% CI = 1.47, 18.73, 3 studies, 334 children, very low certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS: UNHS programs result in earlier identification of PBHL and may improve neurodevelopment. UNHS should be implemented across high-, middle-, and low-income countries. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020175451) International Society of Global Health 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9579831/ /pubmed/36259421 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.12006 Text en Copyright © 2022 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Theme 8: Global evidence for postnatal care of newborns
Edmond, Karen
Chadha, Shelly
Hunnicutt, Cynthia
Strobel, Natalie
Manchaiah, Vinaya
Yoshinga-Itano, Christine
Effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Theme 8: Global evidence for postnatal care of newborns
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36259421
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.12006
work_keys_str_mv AT edmondkaren effectivenessofuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chadhashelly effectivenessofuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hunnicuttcynthia effectivenessofuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT strobelnatalie effectivenessofuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT manchaiahvinaya effectivenessofuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yoshingaitanochristine effectivenessofuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT effectivenessofuniversalnewbornhearingscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis