Cargando…

Cabazitaxel versus docetaxel for treatment of metastatic castrate refractory prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: To assess cabazitaxel versus docetaxel re‐challenge for the treatment of metastatic castrate refractory prostate cancer (CRPC) patients previously treated with docetaxel at inception of primary hormone therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The CANTATA trial was a prospective, two‐arm, open‐labe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: James, Nicholas D., Ali, Ayesha, Pope, Ann, Desai, Amisha, Ford, Daniel, Stevenson, Robert, Zarkar, Anjali, Pirrie, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36267204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.177
_version_ 1784812279353573376
author James, Nicholas D.
Ali, Ayesha
Pope, Ann
Desai, Amisha
Ford, Daniel
Stevenson, Robert
Zarkar, Anjali
Pirrie, Sarah
author_facet James, Nicholas D.
Ali, Ayesha
Pope, Ann
Desai, Amisha
Ford, Daniel
Stevenson, Robert
Zarkar, Anjali
Pirrie, Sarah
author_sort James, Nicholas D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess cabazitaxel versus docetaxel re‐challenge for the treatment of metastatic castrate refractory prostate cancer (CRPC) patients previously treated with docetaxel at inception of primary hormone therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The CANTATA trial was a prospective, two‐arm, open‐label, phase II study conducted in eight UK centres. Patients over the age of 18, with histologically proven, metastatic prostate cancer who had been previously treated with up to 6 cycles of docetaxel as part of the STAMPEDE trial (or treated with the same drug outside of the trial at primary diagnosis) and had a performance status (PS) of 0–2, were eligible. Patients who progressed during primary treatment with docetaxel or had received prior systemic chemotherapy were excluded. Cabazitaxel (25 mg/m(2)) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) was administered via intravenous infusion every 3 weeks with oral prednisolone (10 mg) for up to 10 cycles, until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. The primary outcome was clinical progression‐free survival (PFS) as defined by either date of pain progression, date of a cancer‐related skeletal‐related event, or date of death from any cause. Analyses were by intention to treat. EudraCT number: 2012‐003835‐40 RESULTS: Between 7 March 2013 and 4 January 2016, 15 patients with a median age of 70 years (range 54–76) were recruited; seven received cabazitaxel, eight docetaxel. The study was halted due to slow accrual. The median clinical PFS time in the cabazitaxel group was 6.2 months compared with 8.4 for the docetaxel group (95% confidence intervals were not reached due to the small number of patients). A total of 13 serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Due to the low number of patients recruited, meaningful comparisons could not be made. However, toxicity was in line with known outcomes for these agents, demonstrating it is feasible and safe to deliver chemotherapy to men relapsing with CRPC after upfront chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9579888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95798882022-10-19 Cabazitaxel versus docetaxel for treatment of metastatic castrate refractory prostate cancer James, Nicholas D. Ali, Ayesha Pope, Ann Desai, Amisha Ford, Daniel Stevenson, Robert Zarkar, Anjali Pirrie, Sarah BJUI Compass To the Clinic OBJECTIVES: To assess cabazitaxel versus docetaxel re‐challenge for the treatment of metastatic castrate refractory prostate cancer (CRPC) patients previously treated with docetaxel at inception of primary hormone therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The CANTATA trial was a prospective, two‐arm, open‐label, phase II study conducted in eight UK centres. Patients over the age of 18, with histologically proven, metastatic prostate cancer who had been previously treated with up to 6 cycles of docetaxel as part of the STAMPEDE trial (or treated with the same drug outside of the trial at primary diagnosis) and had a performance status (PS) of 0–2, were eligible. Patients who progressed during primary treatment with docetaxel or had received prior systemic chemotherapy were excluded. Cabazitaxel (25 mg/m(2)) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) was administered via intravenous infusion every 3 weeks with oral prednisolone (10 mg) for up to 10 cycles, until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. The primary outcome was clinical progression‐free survival (PFS) as defined by either date of pain progression, date of a cancer‐related skeletal‐related event, or date of death from any cause. Analyses were by intention to treat. EudraCT number: 2012‐003835‐40 RESULTS: Between 7 March 2013 and 4 January 2016, 15 patients with a median age of 70 years (range 54–76) were recruited; seven received cabazitaxel, eight docetaxel. The study was halted due to slow accrual. The median clinical PFS time in the cabazitaxel group was 6.2 months compared with 8.4 for the docetaxel group (95% confidence intervals were not reached due to the small number of patients). A total of 13 serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Due to the low number of patients recruited, meaningful comparisons could not be made. However, toxicity was in line with known outcomes for these agents, demonstrating it is feasible and safe to deliver chemotherapy to men relapsing with CRPC after upfront chemotherapy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9579888/ /pubmed/36267204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.177 Text en © 2022 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle To the Clinic
James, Nicholas D.
Ali, Ayesha
Pope, Ann
Desai, Amisha
Ford, Daniel
Stevenson, Robert
Zarkar, Anjali
Pirrie, Sarah
Cabazitaxel versus docetaxel for treatment of metastatic castrate refractory prostate cancer
title Cabazitaxel versus docetaxel for treatment of metastatic castrate refractory prostate cancer
title_full Cabazitaxel versus docetaxel for treatment of metastatic castrate refractory prostate cancer
title_fullStr Cabazitaxel versus docetaxel for treatment of metastatic castrate refractory prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Cabazitaxel versus docetaxel for treatment of metastatic castrate refractory prostate cancer
title_short Cabazitaxel versus docetaxel for treatment of metastatic castrate refractory prostate cancer
title_sort cabazitaxel versus docetaxel for treatment of metastatic castrate refractory prostate cancer
topic To the Clinic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36267204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.177
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesnicholasd cabazitaxelversusdocetaxelfortreatmentofmetastaticcastraterefractoryprostatecancer
AT aliayesha cabazitaxelversusdocetaxelfortreatmentofmetastaticcastraterefractoryprostatecancer
AT popeann cabazitaxelversusdocetaxelfortreatmentofmetastaticcastraterefractoryprostatecancer
AT desaiamisha cabazitaxelversusdocetaxelfortreatmentofmetastaticcastraterefractoryprostatecancer
AT forddaniel cabazitaxelversusdocetaxelfortreatmentofmetastaticcastraterefractoryprostatecancer
AT stevensonrobert cabazitaxelversusdocetaxelfortreatmentofmetastaticcastraterefractoryprostatecancer
AT zarkaranjali cabazitaxelversusdocetaxelfortreatmentofmetastaticcastraterefractoryprostatecancer
AT pirriesarah cabazitaxelversusdocetaxelfortreatmentofmetastaticcastraterefractoryprostatecancer
AT cabazitaxelversusdocetaxelfortreatmentofmetastaticcastraterefractoryprostatecancer