Cargando…

Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to gain experienced nursing perspective on current and future complication reporting and grading in Urology, establish the CAMUS CCI and quality control the use of the Clavien‐Dindo Classification (CDC) in nursing staff. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The 12‐part REDCap‐b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soliman, Christopher, Thomas, Benjamin C., Santaguida, Pasqualina, Lawrentschuk, Nathan, Mertens, Evie, Giannarini, Gianluca, Wuethrich, Patrick Y., Wu, Michael, Khan, Muhammad S., Nair, Rajesh, Thurairaja, Ramesh, Challacombe, Benjamin, Dasgupta, Prokar, Malde, Sachin, Corcoran, Niall M., Spiess, Philippe E., Dundee, Philip, Furrer, Marc A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36267199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.173
_version_ 1784812279617814528
author Soliman, Christopher
Thomas, Benjamin C.
Santaguida, Pasqualina
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
Mertens, Evie
Giannarini, Gianluca
Wuethrich, Patrick Y.
Wu, Michael
Khan, Muhammad S.
Nair, Rajesh
Thurairaja, Ramesh
Challacombe, Benjamin
Dasgupta, Prokar
Malde, Sachin
Corcoran, Niall M.
Spiess, Philippe E.
Dundee, Philip
Furrer, Marc A.
author_facet Soliman, Christopher
Thomas, Benjamin C.
Santaguida, Pasqualina
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
Mertens, Evie
Giannarini, Gianluca
Wuethrich, Patrick Y.
Wu, Michael
Khan, Muhammad S.
Nair, Rajesh
Thurairaja, Ramesh
Challacombe, Benjamin
Dasgupta, Prokar
Malde, Sachin
Corcoran, Niall M.
Spiess, Philippe E.
Dundee, Philip
Furrer, Marc A.
author_sort Soliman, Christopher
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to gain experienced nursing perspective on current and future complication reporting and grading in Urology, establish the CAMUS CCI and quality control the use of the Clavien‐Dindo Classification (CDC) in nursing staff. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The 12‐part REDCap‐based Delphi survey was developed in conjunction with expert nurse, urologist and methodologist input. Certified local and international inpatient and outpatient nurses specialised in urology, perioperative nurses and urology‐specific advanced practice nurses/nurse practitioners will be included. A minimum sample size of 250 participants is targeted. The survey assesses participant demographics, nursing experience and opinion on complication reporting and the proposed CAMUS reporting recommendations; grading of intervention events using the existing CDC and the proposed CAMUS Classification; and rating various clinical scenarios. Consensus will be defined as ≥75% agreement. If consensus is not reached, subsequent Delphi rounds will be performed under Steering Committee guidance. RESULTS: Twenty participants completed the pilot survey. Median survey completion time was 58 min (IQR 40–67). The survey revealed that 85% of nursing participants believe nurses should be involved in future complication reporting and grading but currently have poor confidence and inadequate relevant background education. Overall, 100% of participants recognise the universal demand for reporting consensus and 75% hold a preference towards the CAMUS System. Limitations include variability in nursing experience, complexity of supplemental grades and survey duration. CONCLUSION: The integration of experienced nursing opinion and participation in complication reporting and grading systems in a modern and evolving hospital infrastructure may facilitate the assimilation of otherwise overlooked safety data. Incorporation of focused teaching into routine nursing education will be essential to ensure quality control and stimulate awareness of complication‐related burden. This, in turn, has the potential to improve patient counselling and quality of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9579890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95798902022-10-19 Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study Soliman, Christopher Thomas, Benjamin C. Santaguida, Pasqualina Lawrentschuk, Nathan Mertens, Evie Giannarini, Gianluca Wuethrich, Patrick Y. Wu, Michael Khan, Muhammad S. Nair, Rajesh Thurairaja, Ramesh Challacombe, Benjamin Dasgupta, Prokar Malde, Sachin Corcoran, Niall M. Spiess, Philippe E. Dundee, Philip Furrer, Marc A. BJUI Compass To the Clinic OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to gain experienced nursing perspective on current and future complication reporting and grading in Urology, establish the CAMUS CCI and quality control the use of the Clavien‐Dindo Classification (CDC) in nursing staff. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The 12‐part REDCap‐based Delphi survey was developed in conjunction with expert nurse, urologist and methodologist input. Certified local and international inpatient and outpatient nurses specialised in urology, perioperative nurses and urology‐specific advanced practice nurses/nurse practitioners will be included. A minimum sample size of 250 participants is targeted. The survey assesses participant demographics, nursing experience and opinion on complication reporting and the proposed CAMUS reporting recommendations; grading of intervention events using the existing CDC and the proposed CAMUS Classification; and rating various clinical scenarios. Consensus will be defined as ≥75% agreement. If consensus is not reached, subsequent Delphi rounds will be performed under Steering Committee guidance. RESULTS: Twenty participants completed the pilot survey. Median survey completion time was 58 min (IQR 40–67). The survey revealed that 85% of nursing participants believe nurses should be involved in future complication reporting and grading but currently have poor confidence and inadequate relevant background education. Overall, 100% of participants recognise the universal demand for reporting consensus and 75% hold a preference towards the CAMUS System. Limitations include variability in nursing experience, complexity of supplemental grades and survey duration. CONCLUSION: The integration of experienced nursing opinion and participation in complication reporting and grading systems in a modern and evolving hospital infrastructure may facilitate the assimilation of otherwise overlooked safety data. Incorporation of focused teaching into routine nursing education will be essential to ensure quality control and stimulate awareness of complication‐related burden. This, in turn, has the potential to improve patient counselling and quality of care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9579890/ /pubmed/36267199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.173 Text en © 2022 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle To the Clinic
Soliman, Christopher
Thomas, Benjamin C.
Santaguida, Pasqualina
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
Mertens, Evie
Giannarini, Gianluca
Wuethrich, Patrick Y.
Wu, Michael
Khan, Muhammad S.
Nair, Rajesh
Thurairaja, Ramesh
Challacombe, Benjamin
Dasgupta, Prokar
Malde, Sachin
Corcoran, Niall M.
Spiess, Philippe E.
Dundee, Philip
Furrer, Marc A.
Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study
title Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study
title_full Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study
title_fullStr Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study
title_full_unstemmed Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study
title_short Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study
title_sort active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—protocol and results of the camus pilot nurse delphi study
topic To the Clinic
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36267199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.173
work_keys_str_mv AT solimanchristopher activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT thomasbenjaminc activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT santaguidapasqualina activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT lawrentschuknathan activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT mertensevie activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT giannarinigianluca activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT wuethrichpatricky activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT wumichael activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT khanmuhammads activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT nairrajesh activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT thurairajaramesh activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT challacombebenjamin activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT dasguptaprokar activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT maldesachin activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT corcoranniallm activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT spiessphilippee activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT dundeephilip activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy
AT furrermarca activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy