Cargando…
Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to gain experienced nursing perspective on current and future complication reporting and grading in Urology, establish the CAMUS CCI and quality control the use of the Clavien‐Dindo Classification (CDC) in nursing staff. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The 12‐part REDCap‐b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36267199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.173 |
_version_ | 1784812279617814528 |
---|---|
author | Soliman, Christopher Thomas, Benjamin C. Santaguida, Pasqualina Lawrentschuk, Nathan Mertens, Evie Giannarini, Gianluca Wuethrich, Patrick Y. Wu, Michael Khan, Muhammad S. Nair, Rajesh Thurairaja, Ramesh Challacombe, Benjamin Dasgupta, Prokar Malde, Sachin Corcoran, Niall M. Spiess, Philippe E. Dundee, Philip Furrer, Marc A. |
author_facet | Soliman, Christopher Thomas, Benjamin C. Santaguida, Pasqualina Lawrentschuk, Nathan Mertens, Evie Giannarini, Gianluca Wuethrich, Patrick Y. Wu, Michael Khan, Muhammad S. Nair, Rajesh Thurairaja, Ramesh Challacombe, Benjamin Dasgupta, Prokar Malde, Sachin Corcoran, Niall M. Spiess, Philippe E. Dundee, Philip Furrer, Marc A. |
author_sort | Soliman, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to gain experienced nursing perspective on current and future complication reporting and grading in Urology, establish the CAMUS CCI and quality control the use of the Clavien‐Dindo Classification (CDC) in nursing staff. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The 12‐part REDCap‐based Delphi survey was developed in conjunction with expert nurse, urologist and methodologist input. Certified local and international inpatient and outpatient nurses specialised in urology, perioperative nurses and urology‐specific advanced practice nurses/nurse practitioners will be included. A minimum sample size of 250 participants is targeted. The survey assesses participant demographics, nursing experience and opinion on complication reporting and the proposed CAMUS reporting recommendations; grading of intervention events using the existing CDC and the proposed CAMUS Classification; and rating various clinical scenarios. Consensus will be defined as ≥75% agreement. If consensus is not reached, subsequent Delphi rounds will be performed under Steering Committee guidance. RESULTS: Twenty participants completed the pilot survey. Median survey completion time was 58 min (IQR 40–67). The survey revealed that 85% of nursing participants believe nurses should be involved in future complication reporting and grading but currently have poor confidence and inadequate relevant background education. Overall, 100% of participants recognise the universal demand for reporting consensus and 75% hold a preference towards the CAMUS System. Limitations include variability in nursing experience, complexity of supplemental grades and survey duration. CONCLUSION: The integration of experienced nursing opinion and participation in complication reporting and grading systems in a modern and evolving hospital infrastructure may facilitate the assimilation of otherwise overlooked safety data. Incorporation of focused teaching into routine nursing education will be essential to ensure quality control and stimulate awareness of complication‐related burden. This, in turn, has the potential to improve patient counselling and quality of care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9579890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95798902022-10-19 Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study Soliman, Christopher Thomas, Benjamin C. Santaguida, Pasqualina Lawrentschuk, Nathan Mertens, Evie Giannarini, Gianluca Wuethrich, Patrick Y. Wu, Michael Khan, Muhammad S. Nair, Rajesh Thurairaja, Ramesh Challacombe, Benjamin Dasgupta, Prokar Malde, Sachin Corcoran, Niall M. Spiess, Philippe E. Dundee, Philip Furrer, Marc A. BJUI Compass To the Clinic OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to gain experienced nursing perspective on current and future complication reporting and grading in Urology, establish the CAMUS CCI and quality control the use of the Clavien‐Dindo Classification (CDC) in nursing staff. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The 12‐part REDCap‐based Delphi survey was developed in conjunction with expert nurse, urologist and methodologist input. Certified local and international inpatient and outpatient nurses specialised in urology, perioperative nurses and urology‐specific advanced practice nurses/nurse practitioners will be included. A minimum sample size of 250 participants is targeted. The survey assesses participant demographics, nursing experience and opinion on complication reporting and the proposed CAMUS reporting recommendations; grading of intervention events using the existing CDC and the proposed CAMUS Classification; and rating various clinical scenarios. Consensus will be defined as ≥75% agreement. If consensus is not reached, subsequent Delphi rounds will be performed under Steering Committee guidance. RESULTS: Twenty participants completed the pilot survey. Median survey completion time was 58 min (IQR 40–67). The survey revealed that 85% of nursing participants believe nurses should be involved in future complication reporting and grading but currently have poor confidence and inadequate relevant background education. Overall, 100% of participants recognise the universal demand for reporting consensus and 75% hold a preference towards the CAMUS System. Limitations include variability in nursing experience, complexity of supplemental grades and survey duration. CONCLUSION: The integration of experienced nursing opinion and participation in complication reporting and grading systems in a modern and evolving hospital infrastructure may facilitate the assimilation of otherwise overlooked safety data. Incorporation of focused teaching into routine nursing education will be essential to ensure quality control and stimulate awareness of complication‐related burden. This, in turn, has the potential to improve patient counselling and quality of care. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9579890/ /pubmed/36267199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.173 Text en © 2022 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | To the Clinic Soliman, Christopher Thomas, Benjamin C. Santaguida, Pasqualina Lawrentschuk, Nathan Mertens, Evie Giannarini, Gianluca Wuethrich, Patrick Y. Wu, Michael Khan, Muhammad S. Nair, Rajesh Thurairaja, Ramesh Challacombe, Benjamin Dasgupta, Prokar Malde, Sachin Corcoran, Niall M. Spiess, Philippe E. Dundee, Philip Furrer, Marc A. Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study |
title | Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study |
title_full | Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study |
title_fullStr | Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study |
title_short | Active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—Protocol and results of the CAMUS Pilot Nurse Delphi Study |
title_sort | active involvement of nursing staff in reporting and grading complication‐intervention events—protocol and results of the camus pilot nurse delphi study |
topic | To the Clinic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36267199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.173 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT solimanchristopher activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT thomasbenjaminc activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT santaguidapasqualina activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT lawrentschuknathan activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT mertensevie activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT giannarinigianluca activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT wuethrichpatricky activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT wumichael activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT khanmuhammads activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT nairrajesh activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT thurairajaramesh activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT challacombebenjamin activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT dasguptaprokar activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT maldesachin activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT corcoranniallm activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT spiessphilippee activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT dundeephilip activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy AT furrermarca activeinvolvementofnursingstaffinreportingandgradingcomplicationinterventioneventsprotocolandresultsofthecamuspilotnursedelphistudy |