Cargando…

Trends in Health Quality–Related Publications Over the Past Three Decades: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Quality assessment in health care is a process of planned activities with the ultimate goal of achieving a continuous improvement of medical care through the evaluation of structure, process, and outcome measures. Physicians and health care specialists involved with quality issues are fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendlovic, Joseph, Mimouni, Francis B, Arad, Iris, Heiman, Eyal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36194464
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/31055
_version_ 1784812287280807936
author Mendlovic, Joseph
Mimouni, Francis B
Arad, Iris
Heiman, Eyal
author_facet Mendlovic, Joseph
Mimouni, Francis B
Arad, Iris
Heiman, Eyal
author_sort Mendlovic, Joseph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quality assessment in health care is a process of planned activities with the ultimate goal of achieving a continuous improvement of medical care through the evaluation of structure, process, and outcome measures. Physicians and health care specialists involved with quality issues are faced with an enormous and nearly always increasing amount of literature to read and integrate. Nevertheless, the novelty and quality of these articles (in terms of evidence-based medicine) has not been systematically assessed and described. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the number of high-evidence journal articles (according to the pyramid of evidence), such as randomized control trials, systematic reviews, and ultimately, practice guidelines, increases over time, relative to lower-evidence journal articles, such as editorials, reviews, and letters to the editors. METHODS: We used PubMed database to retrieve relevant articles published during the 31-year period between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 2021. The search was conducted in April 2022. We used the keywords “quality care,” “quality management,” “quality indicators,” and “quality improvement” and limited the search fields to title and abstract in order to limit our search results to articles nearly exclusively related to health care quality. RESULTS: During this 31-year evaluation period, there was a significant cubic increase in the total number of publications, reviews, clinical trials (peaking in 2017, with a sharp decline until 2021), controlled trials (peaking in 2016, with a sharp drop until 2021), randomized controlled trials (peaking in 2017, with a sharp drop until 2021), systematic reviews (nearly nonexistent in the 1980s through 1990s to a peak of 222 in 2021), and meta-analyses (from nearly none in the 1980s through 1990s to a peak of approximately 40 per year in 2020). There was a linear increase in practice guidelines from none during 1989-1991 to approximately 25 per year during 2019-2021, including a cubic increase in editorials, peaking in 2021 at 125 per year, and in letters to the editor, peaking at 50-78 per year in the last 4 years (ie, 2018-2021). CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 31 years, the field of quality in health care has seen a significant yearly increase of published original studies with a relative stagnation since 2015. We suggest that contributors to this dynamic field of research should focus on producing more evidence-based publications and guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9579930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95799302022-10-20 Trends in Health Quality–Related Publications Over the Past Three Decades: Systematic Review Mendlovic, Joseph Mimouni, Francis B Arad, Iris Heiman, Eyal Interact J Med Res Review BACKGROUND: Quality assessment in health care is a process of planned activities with the ultimate goal of achieving a continuous improvement of medical care through the evaluation of structure, process, and outcome measures. Physicians and health care specialists involved with quality issues are faced with an enormous and nearly always increasing amount of literature to read and integrate. Nevertheless, the novelty and quality of these articles (in terms of evidence-based medicine) has not been systematically assessed and described. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the number of high-evidence journal articles (according to the pyramid of evidence), such as randomized control trials, systematic reviews, and ultimately, practice guidelines, increases over time, relative to lower-evidence journal articles, such as editorials, reviews, and letters to the editors. METHODS: We used PubMed database to retrieve relevant articles published during the 31-year period between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 2021. The search was conducted in April 2022. We used the keywords “quality care,” “quality management,” “quality indicators,” and “quality improvement” and limited the search fields to title and abstract in order to limit our search results to articles nearly exclusively related to health care quality. RESULTS: During this 31-year evaluation period, there was a significant cubic increase in the total number of publications, reviews, clinical trials (peaking in 2017, with a sharp decline until 2021), controlled trials (peaking in 2016, with a sharp drop until 2021), randomized controlled trials (peaking in 2017, with a sharp drop until 2021), systematic reviews (nearly nonexistent in the 1980s through 1990s to a peak of 222 in 2021), and meta-analyses (from nearly none in the 1980s through 1990s to a peak of approximately 40 per year in 2020). There was a linear increase in practice guidelines from none during 1989-1991 to approximately 25 per year during 2019-2021, including a cubic increase in editorials, peaking in 2021 at 125 per year, and in letters to the editor, peaking at 50-78 per year in the last 4 years (ie, 2018-2021). CONCLUSIONS: Over the past 31 years, the field of quality in health care has seen a significant yearly increase of published original studies with a relative stagnation since 2015. We suggest that contributors to this dynamic field of research should focus on producing more evidence-based publications and guidelines. JMIR Publications 2022-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9579930/ /pubmed/36194464 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/31055 Text en ©Joseph Mendlovic, Francis B Mimouni, Iris Arad, Eyal Heiman. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (https://www.i-jmr.org/), 04.10.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.i-jmr.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Mendlovic, Joseph
Mimouni, Francis B
Arad, Iris
Heiman, Eyal
Trends in Health Quality–Related Publications Over the Past Three Decades: Systematic Review
title Trends in Health Quality–Related Publications Over the Past Three Decades: Systematic Review
title_full Trends in Health Quality–Related Publications Over the Past Three Decades: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Trends in Health Quality–Related Publications Over the Past Three Decades: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Health Quality–Related Publications Over the Past Three Decades: Systematic Review
title_short Trends in Health Quality–Related Publications Over the Past Three Decades: Systematic Review
title_sort trends in health quality–related publications over the past three decades: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9579930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36194464
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/31055
work_keys_str_mv AT mendlovicjoseph trendsinhealthqualityrelatedpublicationsoverthepastthreedecadessystematicreview
AT mimounifrancisb trendsinhealthqualityrelatedpublicationsoverthepastthreedecadessystematicreview
AT aradiris trendsinhealthqualityrelatedpublicationsoverthepastthreedecadessystematicreview
AT heimaneyal trendsinhealthqualityrelatedpublicationsoverthepastthreedecadessystematicreview