Cargando…
The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it)
BACKGROUND: Having a body mass index (BMI) which is classified as overweight (BMI ≥ 25) or obese (BMI ≥ 30) increases the risk of complications during pregnancy and labour. Weight-management interventions which target excess gestational weight gain during pregnancy have had limited success. Women wh...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9580156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36258184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05077-0 |
_version_ | 1784812332260524032 |
---|---|
author | Channon, Susan Coulman, Elinor Cannings-John, Rebecca Henley, Josie Lau, Mandy Lugg-Widger, Fiona Strange, Heather Davies, Freya Sanders, Julia Scherf, Caroline Couzens, Zoe Morantz, Leah |
author_facet | Channon, Susan Coulman, Elinor Cannings-John, Rebecca Henley, Josie Lau, Mandy Lugg-Widger, Fiona Strange, Heather Davies, Freya Sanders, Julia Scherf, Caroline Couzens, Zoe Morantz, Leah |
author_sort | Channon, Susan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Having a body mass index (BMI) which is classified as overweight (BMI ≥ 25) or obese (BMI ≥ 30) increases the risk of complications during pregnancy and labour. Weight-management interventions which target excess gestational weight gain during pregnancy have had limited success. Women who use long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) are in contact with services as part of their preparation for conception, creating a potential opportunity to offer a preconception weight-loss intervention. The aims of this mixed methods study were to assess the acceptability and practicability of a weight-loss intervention which asked people to delay LARC removal in order to lose weight before conceiving. METHODS: Routine UK NHS data were analysed to identify pathways from LARC removal to pregnancy. Qualitative surveys and advisory group discussions with service providers and LARC users with experience of being overweight were conducted and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Three hundred fifteen thousand seven hundred fifty-five UK women aged 16–48 years between 2009–2018 had at least one LARC-related event (e.g. insertion, removal) and 1.7% of those events were recorded as related to planning a pregnancy. BMI was included in 62% of women’s records, with 54% of those BMI being classified as overweight or obese. Online surveys were completed by 100 healthcare practitioners and 243 LARC users. Stakeholders identified facilitators and barriers associated with the proposed intervention including sensitivities of discussing weight, service-user past experiences, practitioner skills, the setting and ethical implications of the proposed intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Although women and service providers recognised potential benefits, a preconception weight-loss intervention asking people to delay LARC removal posed many barriers, due mainly to the acceptability of such an intervention to women and healthcare practitioners. Weight-loss interventions that target the general population, together with a focus on improving public knowledge of preconception health, may be more acceptable than interventions which solely focus on LARC users. Many of the barriers identified, including communication, understanding and beliefs about weight and risk, appointment systems and the limitations of routine datasets also have relevance for any preconception weight-loss intervention. Work to improve routine datasets and reducing communication barriers to discussing weight are priorities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14733020 registered 10.05.2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05077-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9580156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95801562022-10-20 The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it) Channon, Susan Coulman, Elinor Cannings-John, Rebecca Henley, Josie Lau, Mandy Lugg-Widger, Fiona Strange, Heather Davies, Freya Sanders, Julia Scherf, Caroline Couzens, Zoe Morantz, Leah BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Having a body mass index (BMI) which is classified as overweight (BMI ≥ 25) or obese (BMI ≥ 30) increases the risk of complications during pregnancy and labour. Weight-management interventions which target excess gestational weight gain during pregnancy have had limited success. Women who use long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) are in contact with services as part of their preparation for conception, creating a potential opportunity to offer a preconception weight-loss intervention. The aims of this mixed methods study were to assess the acceptability and practicability of a weight-loss intervention which asked people to delay LARC removal in order to lose weight before conceiving. METHODS: Routine UK NHS data were analysed to identify pathways from LARC removal to pregnancy. Qualitative surveys and advisory group discussions with service providers and LARC users with experience of being overweight were conducted and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Three hundred fifteen thousand seven hundred fifty-five UK women aged 16–48 years between 2009–2018 had at least one LARC-related event (e.g. insertion, removal) and 1.7% of those events were recorded as related to planning a pregnancy. BMI was included in 62% of women’s records, with 54% of those BMI being classified as overweight or obese. Online surveys were completed by 100 healthcare practitioners and 243 LARC users. Stakeholders identified facilitators and barriers associated with the proposed intervention including sensitivities of discussing weight, service-user past experiences, practitioner skills, the setting and ethical implications of the proposed intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Although women and service providers recognised potential benefits, a preconception weight-loss intervention asking people to delay LARC removal posed many barriers, due mainly to the acceptability of such an intervention to women and healthcare practitioners. Weight-loss interventions that target the general population, together with a focus on improving public knowledge of preconception health, may be more acceptable than interventions which solely focus on LARC users. Many of the barriers identified, including communication, understanding and beliefs about weight and risk, appointment systems and the limitations of routine datasets also have relevance for any preconception weight-loss intervention. Work to improve routine datasets and reducing communication barriers to discussing weight are priorities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14733020 registered 10.05.2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05077-0. BioMed Central 2022-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9580156/ /pubmed/36258184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05077-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Channon, Susan Coulman, Elinor Cannings-John, Rebecca Henley, Josie Lau, Mandy Lugg-Widger, Fiona Strange, Heather Davies, Freya Sanders, Julia Scherf, Caroline Couzens, Zoe Morantz, Leah The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it) |
title | The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it) |
title_full | The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it) |
title_fullStr | The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it) |
title_full_unstemmed | The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it) |
title_short | The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it) |
title_sort | acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (plan-it) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9580156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36258184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05077-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT channonsusan theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT coulmanelinor theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT canningsjohnrebecca theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT henleyjosie theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT laumandy theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT luggwidgerfiona theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT strangeheather theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT daviesfreya theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT sandersjulia theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT scherfcaroline theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT couzenszoe theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT morantzleah theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT channonsusan acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT coulmanelinor acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT canningsjohnrebecca acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT henleyjosie acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT laumandy acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT luggwidgerfiona acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT strangeheather acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT daviesfreya acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT sandersjulia acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT scherfcaroline acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT couzenszoe acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit AT morantzleah acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit |