Cargando…

The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it)

BACKGROUND: Having a body mass index (BMI) which is classified as overweight (BMI ≥ 25) or obese (BMI ≥ 30) increases the risk of complications during pregnancy and labour. Weight-management interventions which target excess gestational weight gain during pregnancy have had limited success. Women wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Channon, Susan, Coulman, Elinor, Cannings-John, Rebecca, Henley, Josie, Lau, Mandy, Lugg-Widger, Fiona, Strange, Heather, Davies, Freya, Sanders, Julia, Scherf, Caroline, Couzens, Zoe, Morantz, Leah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9580156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36258184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05077-0
_version_ 1784812332260524032
author Channon, Susan
Coulman, Elinor
Cannings-John, Rebecca
Henley, Josie
Lau, Mandy
Lugg-Widger, Fiona
Strange, Heather
Davies, Freya
Sanders, Julia
Scherf, Caroline
Couzens, Zoe
Morantz, Leah
author_facet Channon, Susan
Coulman, Elinor
Cannings-John, Rebecca
Henley, Josie
Lau, Mandy
Lugg-Widger, Fiona
Strange, Heather
Davies, Freya
Sanders, Julia
Scherf, Caroline
Couzens, Zoe
Morantz, Leah
author_sort Channon, Susan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Having a body mass index (BMI) which is classified as overweight (BMI ≥ 25) or obese (BMI ≥ 30) increases the risk of complications during pregnancy and labour. Weight-management interventions which target excess gestational weight gain during pregnancy have had limited success. Women who use long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) are in contact with services as part of their preparation for conception, creating a potential opportunity to offer a preconception weight-loss intervention. The aims of this mixed methods study were to assess the acceptability and practicability of a weight-loss intervention which asked people to delay LARC removal in order to lose weight before conceiving. METHODS: Routine UK NHS data were analysed to identify pathways from LARC removal to pregnancy. Qualitative surveys and advisory group discussions with service providers and LARC users with experience of being overweight were conducted and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Three hundred fifteen thousand seven hundred fifty-five UK women aged 16–48 years between 2009–2018 had at least one LARC-related event (e.g. insertion, removal) and 1.7% of those events were recorded as related to planning a pregnancy. BMI was included in 62% of women’s records, with 54% of those BMI being classified as overweight or obese. Online surveys were completed by 100 healthcare practitioners and 243 LARC users. Stakeholders identified facilitators and barriers associated with the proposed intervention including sensitivities of discussing weight, service-user past experiences, practitioner skills, the setting and ethical implications of the proposed intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Although women and service providers recognised potential benefits, a preconception weight-loss intervention asking people to delay LARC removal posed many barriers, due mainly to the acceptability of such an intervention to women and healthcare practitioners. Weight-loss interventions that target the general population, together with a focus on improving public knowledge of preconception health, may be more acceptable than interventions which solely focus on LARC users. Many of the barriers identified, including communication, understanding and beliefs about weight and risk, appointment systems and the limitations of routine datasets also have relevance for any preconception weight-loss intervention. Work to improve routine datasets and reducing communication barriers to discussing weight are priorities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14733020 registered 10.05.2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05077-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9580156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95801562022-10-20 The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it) Channon, Susan Coulman, Elinor Cannings-John, Rebecca Henley, Josie Lau, Mandy Lugg-Widger, Fiona Strange, Heather Davies, Freya Sanders, Julia Scherf, Caroline Couzens, Zoe Morantz, Leah BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Having a body mass index (BMI) which is classified as overweight (BMI ≥ 25) or obese (BMI ≥ 30) increases the risk of complications during pregnancy and labour. Weight-management interventions which target excess gestational weight gain during pregnancy have had limited success. Women who use long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) are in contact with services as part of their preparation for conception, creating a potential opportunity to offer a preconception weight-loss intervention. The aims of this mixed methods study were to assess the acceptability and practicability of a weight-loss intervention which asked people to delay LARC removal in order to lose weight before conceiving. METHODS: Routine UK NHS data were analysed to identify pathways from LARC removal to pregnancy. Qualitative surveys and advisory group discussions with service providers and LARC users with experience of being overweight were conducted and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Three hundred fifteen thousand seven hundred fifty-five UK women aged 16–48 years between 2009–2018 had at least one LARC-related event (e.g. insertion, removal) and 1.7% of those events were recorded as related to planning a pregnancy. BMI was included in 62% of women’s records, with 54% of those BMI being classified as overweight or obese. Online surveys were completed by 100 healthcare practitioners and 243 LARC users. Stakeholders identified facilitators and barriers associated with the proposed intervention including sensitivities of discussing weight, service-user past experiences, practitioner skills, the setting and ethical implications of the proposed intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Although women and service providers recognised potential benefits, a preconception weight-loss intervention asking people to delay LARC removal posed many barriers, due mainly to the acceptability of such an intervention to women and healthcare practitioners. Weight-loss interventions that target the general population, together with a focus on improving public knowledge of preconception health, may be more acceptable than interventions which solely focus on LARC users. Many of the barriers identified, including communication, understanding and beliefs about weight and risk, appointment systems and the limitations of routine datasets also have relevance for any preconception weight-loss intervention. Work to improve routine datasets and reducing communication barriers to discussing weight are priorities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14733020 registered 10.05.2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05077-0. BioMed Central 2022-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9580156/ /pubmed/36258184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05077-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Channon, Susan
Coulman, Elinor
Cannings-John, Rebecca
Henley, Josie
Lau, Mandy
Lugg-Widger, Fiona
Strange, Heather
Davies, Freya
Sanders, Julia
Scherf, Caroline
Couzens, Zoe
Morantz, Leah
The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it)
title The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it)
title_full The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it)
title_fullStr The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it)
title_full_unstemmed The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it)
title_short The acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (Plan-it)
title_sort acceptability of asking women to delay removal of a long-acting reversible contraceptive to take part in a preconception weight loss programme: a mixed methods study using qualitative and routine data (plan-it)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9580156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36258184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05077-0
work_keys_str_mv AT channonsusan theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT coulmanelinor theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT canningsjohnrebecca theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT henleyjosie theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT laumandy theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT luggwidgerfiona theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT strangeheather theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT daviesfreya theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT sandersjulia theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT scherfcaroline theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT couzenszoe theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT morantzleah theacceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT channonsusan acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT coulmanelinor acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT canningsjohnrebecca acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT henleyjosie acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT laumandy acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT luggwidgerfiona acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT strangeheather acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT daviesfreya acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT sandersjulia acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT scherfcaroline acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT couzenszoe acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit
AT morantzleah acceptabilityofaskingwomentodelayremovalofalongactingreversiblecontraceptivetotakepartinapreconceptionweightlossprogrammeamixedmethodsstudyusingqualitativeandroutinedataplanit