Cargando…

The efficacy of minocycline hydrochloride ointment versus iodoform gauze for alveolar osteitis: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Alveolar osteitis (AO) is one of the most commonly encountered complication following tooth extraction, however, to date there is no standard methods of prevention and treatment. The study aims to investigate the efficiency of minocycline hydrochloride ointment (MHO) for the treatment of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Yu-qi, Sun, Rui, Zhao, Ji-hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9580180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36258229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02468-9
_version_ 1784812335521595392
author Sun, Yu-qi
Sun, Rui
Zhao, Ji-hong
author_facet Sun, Yu-qi
Sun, Rui
Zhao, Ji-hong
author_sort Sun, Yu-qi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Alveolar osteitis (AO) is one of the most commonly encountered complication following tooth extraction, however, to date there is no standard methods of prevention and treatment. The study aims to investigate the efficiency of minocycline hydrochloride ointment (MHO) for the treatment of alveolar osteitis compared with traditional treatment with iodoform gauze (IG). METHODS/DESIGN: STROBE checklist was followed to report this study. All patients underwent tooth extraction either in our department or other hospitals, whom presented with postoperative pain, were screened out to meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study about AO. Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in our prospective cohort study, and MHO or IG was administered. The Visual analog scale scores were used to assess the pain score of patients. The healing status of the extraction sockets was followed up. Differences in responses between groups were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Chi-square test was performed to explore the differences in the teeth position of AO. RESULTS: Of 41,371 patients underwent tooth extraction with post-operative follow-up in our departments, only 20 patients (0.05%) suffered from AO. 31 patients with AO, whose teeth were extracted in other places, were also enrolled. The incidence of AO was significantly higher in third molars than other teeth (P < 0.01). In 28 patients that were treated with MHO, the pain was relieved substantially on day 3 and almost painless on day 7. And only 25% of cases required dressing change more than once. Whilst 23 patients treated with IG, the pain was relieved on day 5, and 56.5% of cases required multiple dressing change. The difference between the two groups of VAS scores had statistical significance during treatment at 8 h, 24 h, 3d, 5d, and 7d. No allergic reaction or further infection occurred. CONCLUSION: MHO has a safer and higher therapeutic effect in the treatment of AO compared with traditional treatment with IG. MHO may become a preferred treatment modality for AO. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02468-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9580180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95801802022-10-20 The efficacy of minocycline hydrochloride ointment versus iodoform gauze for alveolar osteitis: A prospective cohort study Sun, Yu-qi Sun, Rui Zhao, Ji-hong BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Alveolar osteitis (AO) is one of the most commonly encountered complication following tooth extraction, however, to date there is no standard methods of prevention and treatment. The study aims to investigate the efficiency of minocycline hydrochloride ointment (MHO) for the treatment of alveolar osteitis compared with traditional treatment with iodoform gauze (IG). METHODS/DESIGN: STROBE checklist was followed to report this study. All patients underwent tooth extraction either in our department or other hospitals, whom presented with postoperative pain, were screened out to meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study about AO. Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were enrolled in our prospective cohort study, and MHO or IG was administered. The Visual analog scale scores were used to assess the pain score of patients. The healing status of the extraction sockets was followed up. Differences in responses between groups were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Chi-square test was performed to explore the differences in the teeth position of AO. RESULTS: Of 41,371 patients underwent tooth extraction with post-operative follow-up in our departments, only 20 patients (0.05%) suffered from AO. 31 patients with AO, whose teeth were extracted in other places, were also enrolled. The incidence of AO was significantly higher in third molars than other teeth (P < 0.01). In 28 patients that were treated with MHO, the pain was relieved substantially on day 3 and almost painless on day 7. And only 25% of cases required dressing change more than once. Whilst 23 patients treated with IG, the pain was relieved on day 5, and 56.5% of cases required multiple dressing change. The difference between the two groups of VAS scores had statistical significance during treatment at 8 h, 24 h, 3d, 5d, and 7d. No allergic reaction or further infection occurred. CONCLUSION: MHO has a safer and higher therapeutic effect in the treatment of AO compared with traditional treatment with IG. MHO may become a preferred treatment modality for AO. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02468-9. BioMed Central 2022-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9580180/ /pubmed/36258229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02468-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Sun, Yu-qi
Sun, Rui
Zhao, Ji-hong
The efficacy of minocycline hydrochloride ointment versus iodoform gauze for alveolar osteitis: A prospective cohort study
title The efficacy of minocycline hydrochloride ointment versus iodoform gauze for alveolar osteitis: A prospective cohort study
title_full The efficacy of minocycline hydrochloride ointment versus iodoform gauze for alveolar osteitis: A prospective cohort study
title_fullStr The efficacy of minocycline hydrochloride ointment versus iodoform gauze for alveolar osteitis: A prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of minocycline hydrochloride ointment versus iodoform gauze for alveolar osteitis: A prospective cohort study
title_short The efficacy of minocycline hydrochloride ointment versus iodoform gauze for alveolar osteitis: A prospective cohort study
title_sort efficacy of minocycline hydrochloride ointment versus iodoform gauze for alveolar osteitis: a prospective cohort study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9580180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36258229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02468-9
work_keys_str_mv AT sunyuqi theefficacyofminocyclinehydrochlorideointmentversusiodoformgauzeforalveolarosteitisaprospectivecohortstudy
AT sunrui theefficacyofminocyclinehydrochlorideointmentversusiodoformgauzeforalveolarosteitisaprospectivecohortstudy
AT zhaojihong theefficacyofminocyclinehydrochlorideointmentversusiodoformgauzeforalveolarosteitisaprospectivecohortstudy
AT sunyuqi efficacyofminocyclinehydrochlorideointmentversusiodoformgauzeforalveolarosteitisaprospectivecohortstudy
AT sunrui efficacyofminocyclinehydrochlorideointmentversusiodoformgauzeforalveolarosteitisaprospectivecohortstudy
AT zhaojihong efficacyofminocyclinehydrochlorideointmentversusiodoformgauzeforalveolarosteitisaprospectivecohortstudy