Cargando…

Comparison of computational algorithms for simulating an electrospray plume with a n-body approach

In order to better evaluate the trade-offs between different simulation options for an electrospray thruster plume, we have developed a multi-scale n-body code to compute the evolution of a single emitter electrospray plume in the pure ionic regime. The electrostatic force computations in the simula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hampl, Sebastian K., Waggoner, Marshall T., Gallud Cidoncha, Ximo, Petro, Elaine M., Lozano, Paulo C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9580256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36275926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44205-022-00015-w
_version_ 1784812352658472960
author Hampl, Sebastian K.
Waggoner, Marshall T.
Gallud Cidoncha, Ximo
Petro, Elaine M.
Lozano, Paulo C.
author_facet Hampl, Sebastian K.
Waggoner, Marshall T.
Gallud Cidoncha, Ximo
Petro, Elaine M.
Lozano, Paulo C.
author_sort Hampl, Sebastian K.
collection PubMed
description In order to better evaluate the trade-offs between different simulation options for an electrospray thruster plume, we have developed a multi-scale n-body code to compute the evolution of a single emitter electrospray plume in the pure ionic regime. The electrostatic force computations in the simulation are captured through the use of three different computational algorithms with various degrees of approximation. The results of the simulations for a simple test case are compared in terms of computational speed and accuracy. The test case utilizes a single operating point (323nA) for a stable meniscus solution for the ionic liquid EMI-BF4 firing in the positive pure ion mode. Complex species and probabilistic fragmentation processes are neglected. An overview is provided of the trade-off between accuracy and computational speed for the three algorithms in the context of simulating the electrostatic interactions between particles. For a large number of particles, the faster algorithms show a significant reduction in computational time while maintaining a high level of accuracy with a proper choice of tuning parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9580256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95802562022-10-20 Comparison of computational algorithms for simulating an electrospray plume with a n-body approach Hampl, Sebastian K. Waggoner, Marshall T. Gallud Cidoncha, Ximo Petro, Elaine M. Lozano, Paulo C. J Elect Propuls Research In order to better evaluate the trade-offs between different simulation options for an electrospray thruster plume, we have developed a multi-scale n-body code to compute the evolution of a single emitter electrospray plume in the pure ionic regime. The electrostatic force computations in the simulation are captured through the use of three different computational algorithms with various degrees of approximation. The results of the simulations for a simple test case are compared in terms of computational speed and accuracy. The test case utilizes a single operating point (323nA) for a stable meniscus solution for the ionic liquid EMI-BF4 firing in the positive pure ion mode. Complex species and probabilistic fragmentation processes are neglected. An overview is provided of the trade-off between accuracy and computational speed for the three algorithms in the context of simulating the electrostatic interactions between particles. For a large number of particles, the faster algorithms show a significant reduction in computational time while maintaining a high level of accuracy with a proper choice of tuning parameters. Springer International Publishing 2022-10-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9580256/ /pubmed/36275926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44205-022-00015-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Hampl, Sebastian K.
Waggoner, Marshall T.
Gallud Cidoncha, Ximo
Petro, Elaine M.
Lozano, Paulo C.
Comparison of computational algorithms for simulating an electrospray plume with a n-body approach
title Comparison of computational algorithms for simulating an electrospray plume with a n-body approach
title_full Comparison of computational algorithms for simulating an electrospray plume with a n-body approach
title_fullStr Comparison of computational algorithms for simulating an electrospray plume with a n-body approach
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of computational algorithms for simulating an electrospray plume with a n-body approach
title_short Comparison of computational algorithms for simulating an electrospray plume with a n-body approach
title_sort comparison of computational algorithms for simulating an electrospray plume with a n-body approach
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9580256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36275926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44205-022-00015-w
work_keys_str_mv AT hamplsebastiank comparisonofcomputationalalgorithmsforsimulatinganelectrosprayplumewithanbodyapproach
AT waggonermarshallt comparisonofcomputationalalgorithmsforsimulatinganelectrosprayplumewithanbodyapproach
AT galludcidonchaximo comparisonofcomputationalalgorithmsforsimulatinganelectrosprayplumewithanbodyapproach
AT petroelainem comparisonofcomputationalalgorithmsforsimulatinganelectrosprayplumewithanbodyapproach
AT lozanopauloc comparisonofcomputationalalgorithmsforsimulatinganelectrosprayplumewithanbodyapproach