Cargando…

Propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy: A randomized clinical trial

Laryngospasm is an important complication of tonsillectomies. This study aimed to compare the effects of propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy. This randomized clinical trial included 102 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Patients were randomly divided into...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manouchehrian, Nahid, Jiryaee, Nasrin, Moheb, Faezeh Akbari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9580534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35766592
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2022.10581
_version_ 1784812408653479936
author Manouchehrian, Nahid
Jiryaee, Nasrin
Moheb, Faezeh Akbari
author_facet Manouchehrian, Nahid
Jiryaee, Nasrin
Moheb, Faezeh Akbari
author_sort Manouchehrian, Nahid
collection PubMed
description Laryngospasm is an important complication of tonsillectomies. This study aimed to compare the effects of propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy. This randomized clinical trial included 102 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Patients were randomly divided into two groups treated with 0.5 mg/kg propofol (group P) or 1 mg/kg lidocaine 2% (group L). The frequencies of laryngospasm (within 10 min after extubation), agitation, nausea, vomiting, mean heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were assessed in both groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 16 at a 95% confidence level. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age or weight. In the P group, the frequency of laryngospasm was significantly lower than L within10 minutes after extubation (4.1% versus 16.3%). Furthermore, the frequencies of agitation (p = 0.003), nausea and vomiting (p = 0.002) and mean heart rate (p = 0.026) were significantly higher in the L group than the P group. However, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, MAP, SPO(2), awakening time, length of stay in recovery and frequency of shivering. Propofol can reduce the incidence of laryngospasm, agitation, nausea and vomiting but it has no effect on the patient's awakening time and length of stay in recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9580534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95805342022-10-20 Propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy: A randomized clinical trial Manouchehrian, Nahid Jiryaee, Nasrin Moheb, Faezeh Akbari Eur J Transl Myol Article Laryngospasm is an important complication of tonsillectomies. This study aimed to compare the effects of propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy. This randomized clinical trial included 102 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Patients were randomly divided into two groups treated with 0.5 mg/kg propofol (group P) or 1 mg/kg lidocaine 2% (group L). The frequencies of laryngospasm (within 10 min after extubation), agitation, nausea, vomiting, mean heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were assessed in both groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 16 at a 95% confidence level. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age or weight. In the P group, the frequency of laryngospasm was significantly lower than L within10 minutes after extubation (4.1% versus 16.3%). Furthermore, the frequencies of agitation (p = 0.003), nausea and vomiting (p = 0.002) and mean heart rate (p = 0.026) were significantly higher in the L group than the P group. However, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure, MAP, SPO(2), awakening time, length of stay in recovery and frequency of shivering. Propofol can reduce the incidence of laryngospasm, agitation, nausea and vomiting but it has no effect on the patient's awakening time and length of stay in recovery. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9580534/ /pubmed/35766592 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2022.10581 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (by-nc 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Manouchehrian, Nahid
Jiryaee, Nasrin
Moheb, Faezeh Akbari
Propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy: A randomized clinical trial
title Propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy: A randomized clinical trial
title_full Propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy: A randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy: A randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy: A randomized clinical trial
title_short Propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy: A randomized clinical trial
title_sort propofol versus lidocaine on prevention of laryngospasm in tonsillectomy: a randomized clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9580534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35766592
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ejtm.2022.10581
work_keys_str_mv AT manouchehriannahid propofolversuslidocaineonpreventionoflaryngospasmintonsillectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT jiryaeenasrin propofolversuslidocaineonpreventionoflaryngospasmintonsillectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mohebfaezehakbari propofolversuslidocaineonpreventionoflaryngospasmintonsillectomyarandomizedclinicaltrial