Cargando…
Nebulized corticosteroids versus systemic corticosteroids for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the benefits and harms reported by observational studies and randomized controlled trials
Objective: Systematic comparison of the efficacy and safety of nebulized corticosteroids and systemic corticosteroids for treating acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease reported by high-quality, real-world observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Methods: MEDLINE...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36278148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.966637 |
_version_ | 1784812546405957632 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Han-Shuo Wang, Zhuo Zhao, Li-Mei Liu, Xiao-Dong |
author_facet | Hu, Han-Shuo Wang, Zhuo Zhao, Li-Mei Liu, Xiao-Dong |
author_sort | Hu, Han-Shuo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Systematic comparison of the efficacy and safety of nebulized corticosteroids and systemic corticosteroids for treating acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease reported by high-quality, real-world observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from the database creation date to 1 April 2022. Eligible observational studies and randomized controlled trials with changes in lung function and blood gas analysis results as the primary endpoints of interest, and the numbers of deteriorations and adverse events as the secondary endpoints were sought. Results: Of the 2,837 identified studies, 22 were eligible and included in our analysis (N = 5,764 patients). Compared with systemic corticosteroids, nebulized corticosteroids resulted in comparable improvements in predicted FEV(1)%, FEV(1), PaO(2), PaCO(2), and SaO(2) at the treatment endpoint; however, observational studies reported more significant treatment outcomes with nebulized corticosteroids for FEV(1) [mean difference, 0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17–0.35; p < 0.005]. In terms of adverse reactions, the risks of gastrointestinal symptoms were 11% [Log risk ratio (LogRR) = 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.05–0.15; p < 0.005] higher for systemic corticosteroids than for nebulized corticosteroids in randomized controlled trials, while the risks of hyperglycemia were 6% (LogRR = 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01–0.11; p = 0.01) and 13% (LogRR = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.09–0.16; p < 0.005) higher in observational studies and randomized controlled trials, respectively. Conclusion: According to our meta-analysis, either study type supported that nebulized corticosteroids can be used as an alternative to systemic corticosteroids for treating acute exacerbation of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, more well-designed prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal dose of nebulized corticosteroids and the advantages of sequential therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9581123 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95811232022-10-20 Nebulized corticosteroids versus systemic corticosteroids for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the benefits and harms reported by observational studies and randomized controlled trials Hu, Han-Shuo Wang, Zhuo Zhao, Li-Mei Liu, Xiao-Dong Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Objective: Systematic comparison of the efficacy and safety of nebulized corticosteroids and systemic corticosteroids for treating acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease reported by high-quality, real-world observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from the database creation date to 1 April 2022. Eligible observational studies and randomized controlled trials with changes in lung function and blood gas analysis results as the primary endpoints of interest, and the numbers of deteriorations and adverse events as the secondary endpoints were sought. Results: Of the 2,837 identified studies, 22 were eligible and included in our analysis (N = 5,764 patients). Compared with systemic corticosteroids, nebulized corticosteroids resulted in comparable improvements in predicted FEV(1)%, FEV(1), PaO(2), PaCO(2), and SaO(2) at the treatment endpoint; however, observational studies reported more significant treatment outcomes with nebulized corticosteroids for FEV(1) [mean difference, 0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17–0.35; p < 0.005]. In terms of adverse reactions, the risks of gastrointestinal symptoms were 11% [Log risk ratio (LogRR) = 0.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.05–0.15; p < 0.005] higher for systemic corticosteroids than for nebulized corticosteroids in randomized controlled trials, while the risks of hyperglycemia were 6% (LogRR = 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01–0.11; p = 0.01) and 13% (LogRR = 0.12; 95% CI, 0.09–0.16; p < 0.005) higher in observational studies and randomized controlled trials, respectively. Conclusion: According to our meta-analysis, either study type supported that nebulized corticosteroids can be used as an alternative to systemic corticosteroids for treating acute exacerbation of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, more well-designed prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal dose of nebulized corticosteroids and the advantages of sequential therapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9581123/ /pubmed/36278148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.966637 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hu, Wang, Zhao and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Hu, Han-Shuo Wang, Zhuo Zhao, Li-Mei Liu, Xiao-Dong Nebulized corticosteroids versus systemic corticosteroids for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the benefits and harms reported by observational studies and randomized controlled trials |
title | Nebulized corticosteroids versus systemic corticosteroids for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the benefits and harms reported by observational studies and randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Nebulized corticosteroids versus systemic corticosteroids for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the benefits and harms reported by observational studies and randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Nebulized corticosteroids versus systemic corticosteroids for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the benefits and harms reported by observational studies and randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Nebulized corticosteroids versus systemic corticosteroids for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the benefits and harms reported by observational studies and randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Nebulized corticosteroids versus systemic corticosteroids for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the benefits and harms reported by observational studies and randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | nebulized corticosteroids versus systemic corticosteroids for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the benefits and harms reported by observational studies and randomized controlled trials |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36278148 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.966637 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huhanshuo nebulizedcorticosteroidsversussystemiccorticosteroidsforpatientswithacuteexacerbationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingthebenefitsandharmsreportedbyobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wangzhuo nebulizedcorticosteroidsversussystemiccorticosteroidsforpatientswithacuteexacerbationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingthebenefitsandharmsreportedbyobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhaolimei nebulizedcorticosteroidsversussystemiccorticosteroidsforpatientswithacuteexacerbationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingthebenefitsandharmsreportedbyobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liuxiaodong nebulizedcorticosteroidsversussystemiccorticosteroidsforpatientswithacuteexacerbationofchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysiscomparingthebenefitsandharmsreportedbyobservationalstudiesandrandomizedcontrolledtrials |