Cargando…

Evaluating Digital Health Capability at Scale Using the Digital Health Indicator

Background  Health service providers must understand their digital health capability if they are to drive digital transformation in a strategic and informed manner. Little is known about the assessment and benchmarking of digital maturity or capability at scale across an entire jurisdiction. The pub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woods, Leanna, Eden, Rebekah, Pearce, Andrew, Wong, Yu Ching Ides, Jayan, Lakshmi, Green, Damian, McNeil, Keith, Sullivan, Clair
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36261114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757554
_version_ 1784812657462738944
author Woods, Leanna
Eden, Rebekah
Pearce, Andrew
Wong, Yu Ching Ides
Jayan, Lakshmi
Green, Damian
McNeil, Keith
Sullivan, Clair
author_facet Woods, Leanna
Eden, Rebekah
Pearce, Andrew
Wong, Yu Ching Ides
Jayan, Lakshmi
Green, Damian
McNeil, Keith
Sullivan, Clair
author_sort Woods, Leanna
collection PubMed
description Background  Health service providers must understand their digital health capability if they are to drive digital transformation in a strategic and informed manner. Little is known about the assessment and benchmarking of digital maturity or capability at scale across an entire jurisdiction. The public health care system across the state of Queensland, Australia has an ambitious 10-year digital transformation strategy. Objective  The aim of this research was to evaluate the digital health capability in Queensland to inform digital health strategy and investment. Methods  The Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Digital Health Indicator (DHI) was used via a cross-sectional survey design to assess four core dimensions of digital health transformation: governance and workforce; interoperability; person-enabled health; and predictive analytics across an entire jurisdiction simultaneously. The DHI questionnaire was completed by each health care system ( n  = 16) within Queensland in February to July 2021. DHI is scored 0 to 400 and dimension score is 0 to 100. Results  The results reveal a variation in DHI scores reflecting the diverse stages of health care digitization across the state. The average DHI score across sites was 143 (range 78–193; SD35.3) which is similar to other systems in the Oceania region and global public systems but below the global private average. Governance and workforce was on average the highest scoring dimension (x̅= 54), followed by interoperability (x̅ = 46), person-enabled health (x̅ = 36), and predictive analytics (x̅ = 30). Conclusion  The findings were incorporated into the new digital health strategy for the jurisdiction. As one of the largest single simultaneous assessments of digital health capability globally, the findings and lessons learnt offer insights for policy makers and organizational managers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9581585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95815852022-10-20 Evaluating Digital Health Capability at Scale Using the Digital Health Indicator Woods, Leanna Eden, Rebekah Pearce, Andrew Wong, Yu Ching Ides Jayan, Lakshmi Green, Damian McNeil, Keith Sullivan, Clair Appl Clin Inform Background  Health service providers must understand their digital health capability if they are to drive digital transformation in a strategic and informed manner. Little is known about the assessment and benchmarking of digital maturity or capability at scale across an entire jurisdiction. The public health care system across the state of Queensland, Australia has an ambitious 10-year digital transformation strategy. Objective  The aim of this research was to evaluate the digital health capability in Queensland to inform digital health strategy and investment. Methods  The Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Digital Health Indicator (DHI) was used via a cross-sectional survey design to assess four core dimensions of digital health transformation: governance and workforce; interoperability; person-enabled health; and predictive analytics across an entire jurisdiction simultaneously. The DHI questionnaire was completed by each health care system ( n  = 16) within Queensland in February to July 2021. DHI is scored 0 to 400 and dimension score is 0 to 100. Results  The results reveal a variation in DHI scores reflecting the diverse stages of health care digitization across the state. The average DHI score across sites was 143 (range 78–193; SD35.3) which is similar to other systems in the Oceania region and global public systems but below the global private average. Governance and workforce was on average the highest scoring dimension (x̅= 54), followed by interoperability (x̅ = 46), person-enabled health (x̅ = 36), and predictive analytics (x̅ = 30). Conclusion  The findings were incorporated into the new digital health strategy for the jurisdiction. As one of the largest single simultaneous assessments of digital health capability globally, the findings and lessons learnt offer insights for policy makers and organizational managers. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9581585/ /pubmed/36261114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757554 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Woods, Leanna
Eden, Rebekah
Pearce, Andrew
Wong, Yu Ching Ides
Jayan, Lakshmi
Green, Damian
McNeil, Keith
Sullivan, Clair
Evaluating Digital Health Capability at Scale Using the Digital Health Indicator
title Evaluating Digital Health Capability at Scale Using the Digital Health Indicator
title_full Evaluating Digital Health Capability at Scale Using the Digital Health Indicator
title_fullStr Evaluating Digital Health Capability at Scale Using the Digital Health Indicator
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Digital Health Capability at Scale Using the Digital Health Indicator
title_short Evaluating Digital Health Capability at Scale Using the Digital Health Indicator
title_sort evaluating digital health capability at scale using the digital health indicator
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36261114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757554
work_keys_str_mv AT woodsleanna evaluatingdigitalhealthcapabilityatscaleusingthedigitalhealthindicator
AT edenrebekah evaluatingdigitalhealthcapabilityatscaleusingthedigitalhealthindicator
AT pearceandrew evaluatingdigitalhealthcapabilityatscaleusingthedigitalhealthindicator
AT wongyuchingides evaluatingdigitalhealthcapabilityatscaleusingthedigitalhealthindicator
AT jayanlakshmi evaluatingdigitalhealthcapabilityatscaleusingthedigitalhealthindicator
AT greendamian evaluatingdigitalhealthcapabilityatscaleusingthedigitalhealthindicator
AT mcneilkeith evaluatingdigitalhealthcapabilityatscaleusingthedigitalhealthindicator
AT sullivanclair evaluatingdigitalhealthcapabilityatscaleusingthedigitalhealthindicator