Cargando…
A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach
Mixed pixels in aerial and satellite images are common, especially near the boundaries of two or more discrete classes; that is, they tend to occur at the transitional region between two classes. Ideally, to decipher the mixed pixel, a soft classification is performed compared to a hard- or a per-pi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36275976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3770871 |
_version_ | 1784812659695157248 |
---|---|
author | Sivakumar, Vidhya Lakshmi Ramkumar, K. Vidhya, K. Gobinathan, B. Gietahun, Yonas Wudineh |
author_facet | Sivakumar, Vidhya Lakshmi Ramkumar, K. Vidhya, K. Gobinathan, B. Gietahun, Yonas Wudineh |
author_sort | Sivakumar, Vidhya Lakshmi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mixed pixels in aerial and satellite images are common, especially near the boundaries of two or more discrete classes; that is, they tend to occur at the transitional region between two classes. Ideally, to decipher the mixed pixel, a soft classification is performed compared to a hard- or a per-pixel classification. Soft or subpixel classification is carried out where the fractional cover of the LULC contained within a pixel is derived. Endmembers are extracted for three VNIR bands of ASTER data for two image datasets using three approaches, namely, principal component analysis (PCA), pixel purity index (PPI), and convex hull-Graham scan (CHGS). On comparing the DN values of the identified endmembers, it is observed that the CHGS method provides the most appropriate end members than the PCA-derived and PPI-derived end members. This is based on deriving the endmembers from two different image conditions. Convex hull implemented using the Graham scan algorithm delineates the pure pixel and pinpoints the exact number of endmembers. These accurate end members would result in accurate proportions of the land cover for better modeling of the terrain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9581599 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95815992022-10-20 A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach Sivakumar, Vidhya Lakshmi Ramkumar, K. Vidhya, K. Gobinathan, B. Gietahun, Yonas Wudineh Comput Intell Neurosci Research Article Mixed pixels in aerial and satellite images are common, especially near the boundaries of two or more discrete classes; that is, they tend to occur at the transitional region between two classes. Ideally, to decipher the mixed pixel, a soft classification is performed compared to a hard- or a per-pixel classification. Soft or subpixel classification is carried out where the fractional cover of the LULC contained within a pixel is derived. Endmembers are extracted for three VNIR bands of ASTER data for two image datasets using three approaches, namely, principal component analysis (PCA), pixel purity index (PPI), and convex hull-Graham scan (CHGS). On comparing the DN values of the identified endmembers, it is observed that the CHGS method provides the most appropriate end members than the PCA-derived and PPI-derived end members. This is based on deriving the endmembers from two different image conditions. Convex hull implemented using the Graham scan algorithm delineates the pure pixel and pinpoints the exact number of endmembers. These accurate end members would result in accurate proportions of the land cover for better modeling of the terrain. Hindawi 2022-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9581599/ /pubmed/36275976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3770871 Text en Copyright © 2022 Vidhya Lakshmi Sivakumar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sivakumar, Vidhya Lakshmi Ramkumar, K. Vidhya, K. Gobinathan, B. Gietahun, Yonas Wudineh A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach |
title | A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach |
title_full | A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach |
title_short | A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach |
title_sort | comparative analysis of methods of endmember selection for use in subpixel classification: a convex hull approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36275976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3770871 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sivakumarvidhyalakshmi acomparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach AT ramkumark acomparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach AT vidhyak acomparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach AT gobinathanb acomparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach AT gietahunyonaswudineh acomparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach AT sivakumarvidhyalakshmi comparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach AT ramkumark comparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach AT vidhyak comparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach AT gobinathanb comparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach AT gietahunyonaswudineh comparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach |