Cargando…

A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach

Mixed pixels in aerial and satellite images are common, especially near the boundaries of two or more discrete classes; that is, they tend to occur at the transitional region between two classes. Ideally, to decipher the mixed pixel, a soft classification is performed compared to a hard- or a per-pi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sivakumar, Vidhya Lakshmi, Ramkumar, K., Vidhya, K., Gobinathan, B., Gietahun, Yonas Wudineh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36275976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3770871
_version_ 1784812659695157248
author Sivakumar, Vidhya Lakshmi
Ramkumar, K.
Vidhya, K.
Gobinathan, B.
Gietahun, Yonas Wudineh
author_facet Sivakumar, Vidhya Lakshmi
Ramkumar, K.
Vidhya, K.
Gobinathan, B.
Gietahun, Yonas Wudineh
author_sort Sivakumar, Vidhya Lakshmi
collection PubMed
description Mixed pixels in aerial and satellite images are common, especially near the boundaries of two or more discrete classes; that is, they tend to occur at the transitional region between two classes. Ideally, to decipher the mixed pixel, a soft classification is performed compared to a hard- or a per-pixel classification. Soft or subpixel classification is carried out where the fractional cover of the LULC contained within a pixel is derived. Endmembers are extracted for three VNIR bands of ASTER data for two image datasets using three approaches, namely, principal component analysis (PCA), pixel purity index (PPI), and convex hull-Graham scan (CHGS). On comparing the DN values of the identified endmembers, it is observed that the CHGS method provides the most appropriate end members than the PCA-derived and PPI-derived end members. This is based on deriving the endmembers from two different image conditions. Convex hull implemented using the Graham scan algorithm delineates the pure pixel and pinpoints the exact number of endmembers. These accurate end members would result in accurate proportions of the land cover for better modeling of the terrain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9581599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95815992022-10-20 A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach Sivakumar, Vidhya Lakshmi Ramkumar, K. Vidhya, K. Gobinathan, B. Gietahun, Yonas Wudineh Comput Intell Neurosci Research Article Mixed pixels in aerial and satellite images are common, especially near the boundaries of two or more discrete classes; that is, they tend to occur at the transitional region between two classes. Ideally, to decipher the mixed pixel, a soft classification is performed compared to a hard- or a per-pixel classification. Soft or subpixel classification is carried out where the fractional cover of the LULC contained within a pixel is derived. Endmembers are extracted for three VNIR bands of ASTER data for two image datasets using three approaches, namely, principal component analysis (PCA), pixel purity index (PPI), and convex hull-Graham scan (CHGS). On comparing the DN values of the identified endmembers, it is observed that the CHGS method provides the most appropriate end members than the PCA-derived and PPI-derived end members. This is based on deriving the endmembers from two different image conditions. Convex hull implemented using the Graham scan algorithm delineates the pure pixel and pinpoints the exact number of endmembers. These accurate end members would result in accurate proportions of the land cover for better modeling of the terrain. Hindawi 2022-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9581599/ /pubmed/36275976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3770871 Text en Copyright © 2022 Vidhya Lakshmi Sivakumar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sivakumar, Vidhya Lakshmi
Ramkumar, K.
Vidhya, K.
Gobinathan, B.
Gietahun, Yonas Wudineh
A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach
title A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach
title_full A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach
title_fullStr A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach
title_short A Comparative Analysis of Methods of Endmember Selection for Use in Subpixel Classification: A Convex Hull Approach
title_sort comparative analysis of methods of endmember selection for use in subpixel classification: a convex hull approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36275976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3770871
work_keys_str_mv AT sivakumarvidhyalakshmi acomparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach
AT ramkumark acomparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach
AT vidhyak acomparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach
AT gobinathanb acomparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach
AT gietahunyonaswudineh acomparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach
AT sivakumarvidhyalakshmi comparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach
AT ramkumark comparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach
AT vidhyak comparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach
AT gobinathanb comparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach
AT gietahunyonaswudineh comparativeanalysisofmethodsofendmemberselectionforuseinsubpixelclassificationaconvexhullapproach