Cargando…

Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The accurate detection of circulating tumor (ct) DNA is affected by multiple factors, and several controversies still persists regarding clinical applications. In order to assess the consistency of ctDNA gene mutation detection findings in matched melanoma tissue samples and peripheral b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jianchao, Qian, Da, Xu, Xiaochen, Xu, Ming, Wang, Ke, Lu, Hui, Shen, Guoliang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36276290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6233904
_version_ 1784812662348054528
author Zhang, Jianchao
Qian, Da
Xu, Xiaochen
Xu, Ming
Wang, Ke
Lu, Hui
Shen, Guoliang
author_facet Zhang, Jianchao
Qian, Da
Xu, Xiaochen
Xu, Ming
Wang, Ke
Lu, Hui
Shen, Guoliang
author_sort Zhang, Jianchao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The accurate detection of circulating tumor (ct) DNA is affected by multiple factors, and several controversies still persists regarding clinical applications. In order to assess the consistency of ctDNA gene mutation detection findings in matched melanoma tissue samples and peripheral blood, a meta-analysis was performed and provided evidence-based analysis for its clinical applications. METHOD: As of May 20, 2019, the database has been searched using the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library search engines. The ctDNA investigations mentioned in this review may be used to directly or indirectly get the true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false negative (FN) values of melanoma patients. To be excluded from the study are duplicate publications, research that do not offer a full text, inadequate material or an inability to extract data, and animal trials. RESULTS: Overall, the pooled specificity, sensitivity, NLR, PLR, and DOR were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.70-0.75), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.22-0.45), 8.21 (95% CI: 4.67-14.43), and 32.72 (95% CI: 14.81-72.30), respectively. Additionally, we calculated AUC by drawing the SROC curve, and the value of AUC is 0.9287, which indicates that the accuracy of ctDNA in diagnosing melanoma is 92.87% of the gold standard. Furthermore, we conducted a subgroup analysis for different countries, sample sources, and ctDNA detection methods. The pooled results showed that different countries, sample sources, and ctDNA detection methods showed significantly large differences in terms of sensitivity of ctDNA in diagnosing melanoma, while the specificity basically remained the same. CONCLUSION: We discovered that the diagnostic outcomes between matched tumor samples and ctDNA remained more reliable in melanoma patients. ctDNA has the advantages of low trauma, convenient dynamic monitoring, and simple operation. ctDNA is expected to become an auxiliary method for the diagnosis of melanoma gene mutations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9581609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95816092022-10-20 Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhang, Jianchao Qian, Da Xu, Xiaochen Xu, Ming Wang, Ke Lu, Hui Shen, Guoliang J Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: The accurate detection of circulating tumor (ct) DNA is affected by multiple factors, and several controversies still persists regarding clinical applications. In order to assess the consistency of ctDNA gene mutation detection findings in matched melanoma tissue samples and peripheral blood, a meta-analysis was performed and provided evidence-based analysis for its clinical applications. METHOD: As of May 20, 2019, the database has been searched using the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library search engines. The ctDNA investigations mentioned in this review may be used to directly or indirectly get the true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false negative (FN) values of melanoma patients. To be excluded from the study are duplicate publications, research that do not offer a full text, inadequate material or an inability to extract data, and animal trials. RESULTS: Overall, the pooled specificity, sensitivity, NLR, PLR, and DOR were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.70-0.75), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.22-0.45), 8.21 (95% CI: 4.67-14.43), and 32.72 (95% CI: 14.81-72.30), respectively. Additionally, we calculated AUC by drawing the SROC curve, and the value of AUC is 0.9287, which indicates that the accuracy of ctDNA in diagnosing melanoma is 92.87% of the gold standard. Furthermore, we conducted a subgroup analysis for different countries, sample sources, and ctDNA detection methods. The pooled results showed that different countries, sample sources, and ctDNA detection methods showed significantly large differences in terms of sensitivity of ctDNA in diagnosing melanoma, while the specificity basically remained the same. CONCLUSION: We discovered that the diagnostic outcomes between matched tumor samples and ctDNA remained more reliable in melanoma patients. ctDNA has the advantages of low trauma, convenient dynamic monitoring, and simple operation. ctDNA is expected to become an auxiliary method for the diagnosis of melanoma gene mutations. Hindawi 2022-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9581609/ /pubmed/36276290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6233904 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jianchao Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Jianchao
Qian, Da
Xu, Xiaochen
Xu, Ming
Wang, Ke
Lu, Hui
Shen, Guoliang
Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort evaluating the diagnostic potentials of circulating tumor dna against melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36276290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6233904
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjianchao evaluatingthediagnosticpotentialsofcirculatingtumordnaagainstmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qianda evaluatingthediagnosticpotentialsofcirculatingtumordnaagainstmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuxiaochen evaluatingthediagnosticpotentialsofcirculatingtumordnaagainstmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuming evaluatingthediagnosticpotentialsofcirculatingtumordnaagainstmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangke evaluatingthediagnosticpotentialsofcirculatingtumordnaagainstmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luhui evaluatingthediagnosticpotentialsofcirculatingtumordnaagainstmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shenguoliang evaluatingthediagnosticpotentialsofcirculatingtumordnaagainstmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis