Cargando…
Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: The accurate detection of circulating tumor (ct) DNA is affected by multiple factors, and several controversies still persists regarding clinical applications. In order to assess the consistency of ctDNA gene mutation detection findings in matched melanoma tissue samples and peripheral b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36276290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6233904 |
_version_ | 1784812662348054528 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Jianchao Qian, Da Xu, Xiaochen Xu, Ming Wang, Ke Lu, Hui Shen, Guoliang |
author_facet | Zhang, Jianchao Qian, Da Xu, Xiaochen Xu, Ming Wang, Ke Lu, Hui Shen, Guoliang |
author_sort | Zhang, Jianchao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The accurate detection of circulating tumor (ct) DNA is affected by multiple factors, and several controversies still persists regarding clinical applications. In order to assess the consistency of ctDNA gene mutation detection findings in matched melanoma tissue samples and peripheral blood, a meta-analysis was performed and provided evidence-based analysis for its clinical applications. METHOD: As of May 20, 2019, the database has been searched using the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library search engines. The ctDNA investigations mentioned in this review may be used to directly or indirectly get the true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false negative (FN) values of melanoma patients. To be excluded from the study are duplicate publications, research that do not offer a full text, inadequate material or an inability to extract data, and animal trials. RESULTS: Overall, the pooled specificity, sensitivity, NLR, PLR, and DOR were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.70-0.75), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.22-0.45), 8.21 (95% CI: 4.67-14.43), and 32.72 (95% CI: 14.81-72.30), respectively. Additionally, we calculated AUC by drawing the SROC curve, and the value of AUC is 0.9287, which indicates that the accuracy of ctDNA in diagnosing melanoma is 92.87% of the gold standard. Furthermore, we conducted a subgroup analysis for different countries, sample sources, and ctDNA detection methods. The pooled results showed that different countries, sample sources, and ctDNA detection methods showed significantly large differences in terms of sensitivity of ctDNA in diagnosing melanoma, while the specificity basically remained the same. CONCLUSION: We discovered that the diagnostic outcomes between matched tumor samples and ctDNA remained more reliable in melanoma patients. ctDNA has the advantages of low trauma, convenient dynamic monitoring, and simple operation. ctDNA is expected to become an auxiliary method for the diagnosis of melanoma gene mutations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9581609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95816092022-10-20 Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Zhang, Jianchao Qian, Da Xu, Xiaochen Xu, Ming Wang, Ke Lu, Hui Shen, Guoliang J Oncol Research Article BACKGROUND: The accurate detection of circulating tumor (ct) DNA is affected by multiple factors, and several controversies still persists regarding clinical applications. In order to assess the consistency of ctDNA gene mutation detection findings in matched melanoma tissue samples and peripheral blood, a meta-analysis was performed and provided evidence-based analysis for its clinical applications. METHOD: As of May 20, 2019, the database has been searched using the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library search engines. The ctDNA investigations mentioned in this review may be used to directly or indirectly get the true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false negative (FN) values of melanoma patients. To be excluded from the study are duplicate publications, research that do not offer a full text, inadequate material or an inability to extract data, and animal trials. RESULTS: Overall, the pooled specificity, sensitivity, NLR, PLR, and DOR were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.70-0.75), 0.32 (95% CI: 0.22-0.45), 8.21 (95% CI: 4.67-14.43), and 32.72 (95% CI: 14.81-72.30), respectively. Additionally, we calculated AUC by drawing the SROC curve, and the value of AUC is 0.9287, which indicates that the accuracy of ctDNA in diagnosing melanoma is 92.87% of the gold standard. Furthermore, we conducted a subgroup analysis for different countries, sample sources, and ctDNA detection methods. The pooled results showed that different countries, sample sources, and ctDNA detection methods showed significantly large differences in terms of sensitivity of ctDNA in diagnosing melanoma, while the specificity basically remained the same. CONCLUSION: We discovered that the diagnostic outcomes between matched tumor samples and ctDNA remained more reliable in melanoma patients. ctDNA has the advantages of low trauma, convenient dynamic monitoring, and simple operation. ctDNA is expected to become an auxiliary method for the diagnosis of melanoma gene mutations. Hindawi 2022-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9581609/ /pubmed/36276290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6233904 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jianchao Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Jianchao Qian, Da Xu, Xiaochen Xu, Ming Wang, Ke Lu, Hui Shen, Guoliang Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Evaluating the Diagnostic Potentials of Circulating Tumor DNA against Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | evaluating the diagnostic potentials of circulating tumor dna against melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36276290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6233904 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangjianchao evaluatingthediagnosticpotentialsofcirculatingtumordnaagainstmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT qianda evaluatingthediagnosticpotentialsofcirculatingtumordnaagainstmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuxiaochen evaluatingthediagnosticpotentialsofcirculatingtumordnaagainstmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xuming evaluatingthediagnosticpotentialsofcirculatingtumordnaagainstmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangke evaluatingthediagnosticpotentialsofcirculatingtumordnaagainstmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luhui evaluatingthediagnosticpotentialsofcirculatingtumordnaagainstmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shenguoliang evaluatingthediagnosticpotentialsofcirculatingtumordnaagainstmelanomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |