Cargando…

Efficacy of a local anesthetic gel infusion kit for pain relief after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: an open-label, randomized clinical trial

Continuous wound infusion with local anesthesia is an effective method for reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. However, most subcutaneous local anesthesia is delivered through continuous injection, which can be inconvenient for patients. This study compared the effecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Jung Kyong, Jeong, Heejoon, Lee, Woo Yong, Yun, Seong Hyeon, Cho, Yong Beom, Huh, Jung Wook, Park, Yoon Ah, Sim, Woo Seog, Kim, Hee Cheol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36261491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22454-z
_version_ 1784812739685777408
author Shin, Jung Kyong
Jeong, Heejoon
Lee, Woo Yong
Yun, Seong Hyeon
Cho, Yong Beom
Huh, Jung Wook
Park, Yoon Ah
Sim, Woo Seog
Kim, Hee Cheol
author_facet Shin, Jung Kyong
Jeong, Heejoon
Lee, Woo Yong
Yun, Seong Hyeon
Cho, Yong Beom
Huh, Jung Wook
Park, Yoon Ah
Sim, Woo Seog
Kim, Hee Cheol
author_sort Shin, Jung Kyong
collection PubMed
description Continuous wound infusion with local anesthesia is an effective method for reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. However, most subcutaneous local anesthesia is delivered through continuous injection, which can be inconvenient for patients. This study compared the effectiveness of postoperative pain relief from the application of a local poloxamer 407-based ropivacaine hydrogel (Gel) to the incision site with continuous infusion-type ropivacaine administration (On-Q) in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. This prospective, randomized, non-inferiority study included 61 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery with an incision length of 3–6 cm. All 61 patients were randomly assigned to the Gel group (poloxamer 407-based 0.75% ropivacaine, 22.5 mg) or the On-Q group (0.2% ropivacaine, 4 mg/hour for two days). Postoperative analgesia was induced in all patients with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). The outcome measures, which were assessed for 72 h after surgery, included the total amount of fentanyl consumed via IV-PCA (primary endpoint), and the amount of rescue analgesia (pethidine) and postoperative pain intensity assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) [secondary endpoints]. The Gel was administered to 31 patients and On-Q was used for 30 patients. There was no significant difference in the total usage of fentanyl between the two groups (Gel group, 1623.98 mcg; On-Q group, 1595.12 mcg; P = 0.806). There was also no significant difference in the frequency of analgesic rescue medication use (P = 0.213) or NRS scores (postoperative 6 h, P = 0.860; 24 h, P = 0.333; 48 h, P = 0.168; and 72 h, P = 0.655) between the two groups. The Gel, which continuously delivers a local anesthetic to operative sites, can thus be considered an effective device for analgesia and pain relief for midline incisions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9581944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95819442022-10-21 Efficacy of a local anesthetic gel infusion kit for pain relief after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: an open-label, randomized clinical trial Shin, Jung Kyong Jeong, Heejoon Lee, Woo Yong Yun, Seong Hyeon Cho, Yong Beom Huh, Jung Wook Park, Yoon Ah Sim, Woo Seog Kim, Hee Cheol Sci Rep Article Continuous wound infusion with local anesthesia is an effective method for reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. However, most subcutaneous local anesthesia is delivered through continuous injection, which can be inconvenient for patients. This study compared the effectiveness of postoperative pain relief from the application of a local poloxamer 407-based ropivacaine hydrogel (Gel) to the incision site with continuous infusion-type ropivacaine administration (On-Q) in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. This prospective, randomized, non-inferiority study included 61 patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery with an incision length of 3–6 cm. All 61 patients were randomly assigned to the Gel group (poloxamer 407-based 0.75% ropivacaine, 22.5 mg) or the On-Q group (0.2% ropivacaine, 4 mg/hour for two days). Postoperative analgesia was induced in all patients with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). The outcome measures, which were assessed for 72 h after surgery, included the total amount of fentanyl consumed via IV-PCA (primary endpoint), and the amount of rescue analgesia (pethidine) and postoperative pain intensity assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) [secondary endpoints]. The Gel was administered to 31 patients and On-Q was used for 30 patients. There was no significant difference in the total usage of fentanyl between the two groups (Gel group, 1623.98 mcg; On-Q group, 1595.12 mcg; P = 0.806). There was also no significant difference in the frequency of analgesic rescue medication use (P = 0.213) or NRS scores (postoperative 6 h, P = 0.860; 24 h, P = 0.333; 48 h, P = 0.168; and 72 h, P = 0.655) between the two groups. The Gel, which continuously delivers a local anesthetic to operative sites, can thus be considered an effective device for analgesia and pain relief for midline incisions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9581944/ /pubmed/36261491 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22454-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Shin, Jung Kyong
Jeong, Heejoon
Lee, Woo Yong
Yun, Seong Hyeon
Cho, Yong Beom
Huh, Jung Wook
Park, Yoon Ah
Sim, Woo Seog
Kim, Hee Cheol
Efficacy of a local anesthetic gel infusion kit for pain relief after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: an open-label, randomized clinical trial
title Efficacy of a local anesthetic gel infusion kit for pain relief after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: an open-label, randomized clinical trial
title_full Efficacy of a local anesthetic gel infusion kit for pain relief after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: an open-label, randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Efficacy of a local anesthetic gel infusion kit for pain relief after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: an open-label, randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of a local anesthetic gel infusion kit for pain relief after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: an open-label, randomized clinical trial
title_short Efficacy of a local anesthetic gel infusion kit for pain relief after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: an open-label, randomized clinical trial
title_sort efficacy of a local anesthetic gel infusion kit for pain relief after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: an open-label, randomized clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36261491
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22454-z
work_keys_str_mv AT shinjungkyong efficacyofalocalanestheticgelinfusionkitforpainreliefafterminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgeryanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT jeongheejoon efficacyofalocalanestheticgelinfusionkitforpainreliefafterminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgeryanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT leewooyong efficacyofalocalanestheticgelinfusionkitforpainreliefafterminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgeryanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT yunseonghyeon efficacyofalocalanestheticgelinfusionkitforpainreliefafterminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgeryanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT choyongbeom efficacyofalocalanestheticgelinfusionkitforpainreliefafterminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgeryanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT huhjungwook efficacyofalocalanestheticgelinfusionkitforpainreliefafterminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgeryanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT parkyoonah efficacyofalocalanestheticgelinfusionkitforpainreliefafterminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgeryanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT simwooseog efficacyofalocalanestheticgelinfusionkitforpainreliefafterminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgeryanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kimheecheol efficacyofalocalanestheticgelinfusionkitforpainreliefafterminimallyinvasivecolorectalsurgeryanopenlabelrandomizedclinicaltrial