Cargando…
Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review
Transparency in Machine Learning (ML), often also referred to as interpretability or explainability, attempts to reveal the working mechanisms of complex models. From a human-centered design perspective, transparency is not a property of the ML model but an affordance, i.e., a relationship between a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36261476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00699-2 |
_version_ | 1784812748671025152 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Haomin Gomez, Catalina Huang, Chien-Ming Unberath, Mathias |
author_facet | Chen, Haomin Gomez, Catalina Huang, Chien-Ming Unberath, Mathias |
author_sort | Chen, Haomin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transparency in Machine Learning (ML), often also referred to as interpretability or explainability, attempts to reveal the working mechanisms of complex models. From a human-centered design perspective, transparency is not a property of the ML model but an affordance, i.e., a relationship between algorithm and users. Thus, prototyping and user evaluations are critical to attaining solutions that afford transparency. Following human-centered design principles in highly specialized and high stakes domains, such as medical image analysis, is challenging due to the limited access to end users and the knowledge imbalance between those users and ML designers. To investigate the state of transparent ML in medical image analysis, we conducted a systematic review of the literature from 2012 to 2021 in PubMed, EMBASE, and Compendex databases. We identified 2508 records and 68 articles met the inclusion criteria. Current techniques in transparent ML are dominated by computational feasibility and barely consider end users, e.g. clinical stakeholders. Despite the different roles and knowledge of ML developers and end users, no study reported formative user research to inform the design and development of transparent ML models. Only a few studies validated transparency claims through empirical user evaluations. These shortcomings put contemporary research on transparent ML at risk of being incomprehensible to users, and thus, clinically irrelevant. To alleviate these shortcomings in forthcoming research, we introduce the INTRPRT guideline, a design directive for transparent ML systems in medical image analysis. The INTRPRT guideline suggests human-centered design principles, recommending formative user research as the first step to understand user needs and domain requirements. Following these guidelines increases the likelihood that the algorithms afford transparency and enable stakeholders to capitalize on the benefits of transparent ML. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9581990 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95819902022-10-21 Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review Chen, Haomin Gomez, Catalina Huang, Chien-Ming Unberath, Mathias NPJ Digit Med Review Article Transparency in Machine Learning (ML), often also referred to as interpretability or explainability, attempts to reveal the working mechanisms of complex models. From a human-centered design perspective, transparency is not a property of the ML model but an affordance, i.e., a relationship between algorithm and users. Thus, prototyping and user evaluations are critical to attaining solutions that afford transparency. Following human-centered design principles in highly specialized and high stakes domains, such as medical image analysis, is challenging due to the limited access to end users and the knowledge imbalance between those users and ML designers. To investigate the state of transparent ML in medical image analysis, we conducted a systematic review of the literature from 2012 to 2021 in PubMed, EMBASE, and Compendex databases. We identified 2508 records and 68 articles met the inclusion criteria. Current techniques in transparent ML are dominated by computational feasibility and barely consider end users, e.g. clinical stakeholders. Despite the different roles and knowledge of ML developers and end users, no study reported formative user research to inform the design and development of transparent ML models. Only a few studies validated transparency claims through empirical user evaluations. These shortcomings put contemporary research on transparent ML at risk of being incomprehensible to users, and thus, clinically irrelevant. To alleviate these shortcomings in forthcoming research, we introduce the INTRPRT guideline, a design directive for transparent ML systems in medical image analysis. The INTRPRT guideline suggests human-centered design principles, recommending formative user research as the first step to understand user needs and domain requirements. Following these guidelines increases the likelihood that the algorithms afford transparency and enable stakeholders to capitalize on the benefits of transparent ML. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9581990/ /pubmed/36261476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00699-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Chen, Haomin Gomez, Catalina Huang, Chien-Ming Unberath, Mathias Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review |
title | Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review |
title_full | Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review |
title_short | Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review |
title_sort | explainable medical imaging ai needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9581990/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36261476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00699-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenhaomin explainablemedicalimagingaineedshumancentereddesignguidelinesandevidencefromasystematicreview AT gomezcatalina explainablemedicalimagingaineedshumancentereddesignguidelinesandevidencefromasystematicreview AT huangchienming explainablemedicalimagingaineedshumancentereddesignguidelinesandevidencefromasystematicreview AT unberathmathias explainablemedicalimagingaineedshumancentereddesignguidelinesandevidencefromasystematicreview |