Cargando…

Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling

Performance status (PS) is widely used as an assessment of general condition in patients before performing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). However, PS scoring is dependent on each physician, and there is no objective and universal indicator to identify appropriate patients for CGP. Overall, 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayashi, Naomi, Fukada, Ippei, Ohmoto, Akihiro, Yamazaki, Masumi, Wang, Xiaofei, Hosonaga, Mari, Takahashi, Shunji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36260237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00574-2
_version_ 1784812760404590592
author Hayashi, Naomi
Fukada, Ippei
Ohmoto, Akihiro
Yamazaki, Masumi
Wang, Xiaofei
Hosonaga, Mari
Takahashi, Shunji
author_facet Hayashi, Naomi
Fukada, Ippei
Ohmoto, Akihiro
Yamazaki, Masumi
Wang, Xiaofei
Hosonaga, Mari
Takahashi, Shunji
author_sort Hayashi, Naomi
collection PubMed
description Performance status (PS) is widely used as an assessment of general condition in patients before performing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). However, PS scoring is dependent on each physician, and there is no objective and universal indicator to identify appropriate patients for CGP. Overall, 263 patients were scored using the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) from 0 to 2 based on the combination of serum albumin and c-reactive protein (CRP): 0, albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dl and CRP ≤ 0.5 mg/dl; 1, albumin < 3.5 g/dl or CRP > 0.5 mg/dl; and 2, albumin < 3.5 g/dl and CRP > 0.5 mg/dl. Overall survival was compared between mGPS 0–1 and mGPS 2 groups. The prognosis of patients with PS 0–1 and mGPS 2 was also evaluated. Thirty-nine patients (14.8%) were mGPS 2. Patients with mGPS 2 had significant shorter survival (14.7 months vs 4.6 months, p < 0.01). Twenty-eight patients were PS 0–1 and mGPS 2, and their survival was also short (5.6 months). Evaluation of mGPS is a simple and useful method for identifying patients with adequate prognosis using CGP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9582079
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95820792022-10-21 Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling Hayashi, Naomi Fukada, Ippei Ohmoto, Akihiro Yamazaki, Masumi Wang, Xiaofei Hosonaga, Mari Takahashi, Shunji Discov Oncol Research Performance status (PS) is widely used as an assessment of general condition in patients before performing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). However, PS scoring is dependent on each physician, and there is no objective and universal indicator to identify appropriate patients for CGP. Overall, 263 patients were scored using the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) from 0 to 2 based on the combination of serum albumin and c-reactive protein (CRP): 0, albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dl and CRP ≤ 0.5 mg/dl; 1, albumin < 3.5 g/dl or CRP > 0.5 mg/dl; and 2, albumin < 3.5 g/dl and CRP > 0.5 mg/dl. Overall survival was compared between mGPS 0–1 and mGPS 2 groups. The prognosis of patients with PS 0–1 and mGPS 2 was also evaluated. Thirty-nine patients (14.8%) were mGPS 2. Patients with mGPS 2 had significant shorter survival (14.7 months vs 4.6 months, p < 0.01). Twenty-eight patients were PS 0–1 and mGPS 2, and their survival was also short (5.6 months). Evaluation of mGPS is a simple and useful method for identifying patients with adequate prognosis using CGP. Springer US 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9582079/ /pubmed/36260237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00574-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Hayashi, Naomi
Fukada, Ippei
Ohmoto, Akihiro
Yamazaki, Masumi
Wang, Xiaofei
Hosonaga, Mari
Takahashi, Shunji
Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling
title Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling
title_full Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling
title_fullStr Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling
title_short Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling
title_sort evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582079/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36260237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00574-2
work_keys_str_mv AT hayashinaomi evaluationofaninflammationbasedscoreforidentificationofappropriatepatientsforcomprehensivegenomicprofiling
AT fukadaippei evaluationofaninflammationbasedscoreforidentificationofappropriatepatientsforcomprehensivegenomicprofiling
AT ohmotoakihiro evaluationofaninflammationbasedscoreforidentificationofappropriatepatientsforcomprehensivegenomicprofiling
AT yamazakimasumi evaluationofaninflammationbasedscoreforidentificationofappropriatepatientsforcomprehensivegenomicprofiling
AT wangxiaofei evaluationofaninflammationbasedscoreforidentificationofappropriatepatientsforcomprehensivegenomicprofiling
AT hosonagamari evaluationofaninflammationbasedscoreforidentificationofappropriatepatientsforcomprehensivegenomicprofiling
AT takahashishunji evaluationofaninflammationbasedscoreforidentificationofappropriatepatientsforcomprehensivegenomicprofiling