Cargando…
Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling
Performance status (PS) is widely used as an assessment of general condition in patients before performing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). However, PS scoring is dependent on each physician, and there is no objective and universal indicator to identify appropriate patients for CGP. Overall, 2...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36260237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00574-2 |
_version_ | 1784812760404590592 |
---|---|
author | Hayashi, Naomi Fukada, Ippei Ohmoto, Akihiro Yamazaki, Masumi Wang, Xiaofei Hosonaga, Mari Takahashi, Shunji |
author_facet | Hayashi, Naomi Fukada, Ippei Ohmoto, Akihiro Yamazaki, Masumi Wang, Xiaofei Hosonaga, Mari Takahashi, Shunji |
author_sort | Hayashi, Naomi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Performance status (PS) is widely used as an assessment of general condition in patients before performing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). However, PS scoring is dependent on each physician, and there is no objective and universal indicator to identify appropriate patients for CGP. Overall, 263 patients were scored using the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) from 0 to 2 based on the combination of serum albumin and c-reactive protein (CRP): 0, albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dl and CRP ≤ 0.5 mg/dl; 1, albumin < 3.5 g/dl or CRP > 0.5 mg/dl; and 2, albumin < 3.5 g/dl and CRP > 0.5 mg/dl. Overall survival was compared between mGPS 0–1 and mGPS 2 groups. The prognosis of patients with PS 0–1 and mGPS 2 was also evaluated. Thirty-nine patients (14.8%) were mGPS 2. Patients with mGPS 2 had significant shorter survival (14.7 months vs 4.6 months, p < 0.01). Twenty-eight patients were PS 0–1 and mGPS 2, and their survival was also short (5.6 months). Evaluation of mGPS is a simple and useful method for identifying patients with adequate prognosis using CGP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9582079 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95820792022-10-21 Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling Hayashi, Naomi Fukada, Ippei Ohmoto, Akihiro Yamazaki, Masumi Wang, Xiaofei Hosonaga, Mari Takahashi, Shunji Discov Oncol Research Performance status (PS) is widely used as an assessment of general condition in patients before performing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). However, PS scoring is dependent on each physician, and there is no objective and universal indicator to identify appropriate patients for CGP. Overall, 263 patients were scored using the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) from 0 to 2 based on the combination of serum albumin and c-reactive protein (CRP): 0, albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dl and CRP ≤ 0.5 mg/dl; 1, albumin < 3.5 g/dl or CRP > 0.5 mg/dl; and 2, albumin < 3.5 g/dl and CRP > 0.5 mg/dl. Overall survival was compared between mGPS 0–1 and mGPS 2 groups. The prognosis of patients with PS 0–1 and mGPS 2 was also evaluated. Thirty-nine patients (14.8%) were mGPS 2. Patients with mGPS 2 had significant shorter survival (14.7 months vs 4.6 months, p < 0.01). Twenty-eight patients were PS 0–1 and mGPS 2, and their survival was also short (5.6 months). Evaluation of mGPS is a simple and useful method for identifying patients with adequate prognosis using CGP. Springer US 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9582079/ /pubmed/36260237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00574-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Hayashi, Naomi Fukada, Ippei Ohmoto, Akihiro Yamazaki, Masumi Wang, Xiaofei Hosonaga, Mari Takahashi, Shunji Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling |
title | Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling |
title_full | Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling |
title_short | Evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling |
title_sort | evaluation of an inflammation-based score for identification of appropriate patients for comprehensive genomic profiling |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582079/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36260237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12672-022-00574-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hayashinaomi evaluationofaninflammationbasedscoreforidentificationofappropriatepatientsforcomprehensivegenomicprofiling AT fukadaippei evaluationofaninflammationbasedscoreforidentificationofappropriatepatientsforcomprehensivegenomicprofiling AT ohmotoakihiro evaluationofaninflammationbasedscoreforidentificationofappropriatepatientsforcomprehensivegenomicprofiling AT yamazakimasumi evaluationofaninflammationbasedscoreforidentificationofappropriatepatientsforcomprehensivegenomicprofiling AT wangxiaofei evaluationofaninflammationbasedscoreforidentificationofappropriatepatientsforcomprehensivegenomicprofiling AT hosonagamari evaluationofaninflammationbasedscoreforidentificationofappropriatepatientsforcomprehensivegenomicprofiling AT takahashishunji evaluationofaninflammationbasedscoreforidentificationofappropriatepatientsforcomprehensivegenomicprofiling |