Cargando…

Role of Esophagectomy after Chemoradiation Therapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Analysis Stratified by Clinical Response to Chemoradiation Therapy

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effect of esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) by comparing the chemoradiotherapy (CRT)-only group and the trimodality treatment (TMT) group who received concurrent CRT followed by surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Jesang, Kim, Jong Hoon, Kim, Sung-Bae, Park, Sook Ryun, Kim, Young-Hee, Kim, Hyeong Ryul, Lee, Hyun Joo, Song, Ho June, Song, Kye Jin, Jang, Jeong Yun, Jo, Yoon Young, Yoo, Ye Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cancer Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34942686
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2021.885
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effect of esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) by comparing the chemoradiotherapy (CRT)-only group and the trimodality treatment (TMT) group who received concurrent CRT followed by surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 412 operable ESCC patients treated with TMT or CRT between January 2005 and December 2015. The oncological outcomes of the two groups were compared using a weighted Cox proportional-hazards model with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). RESULTS: The median survival time was 64 and 32 months in the TMT (n=270) and CRT (n=142) groups, respectively (p < 0.001). After IPTW, the median overall survival (OS) remained significantly higher in the TMT group than in the CRT group (61 months vs. 32 months, p=0.016). Moreover, the TMT group showed a better local recurrence–free rate (LRFR; p < 0.001) and distant metastasis–free rate (p=0.007). In the subgroup of patients with clinical complete response (cCR), the OS was not significantly different between the two groups, both before and after IPTW adjustment (p=0.35 and p=0.93). However, among non-cCR patients, the OS was significantly higher in the TMT group (64% vs. 45%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with locally advanced ESCC, TMT was superior to CRT in terms of OS and LRFR. Such difference was more prominent in the non-cCR subgroup. In patients who achieved cCR, esophagectomy was effective in improving LRFR but not OS, suggesting that esophagectomy may be omitted in complete responders.