Cargando…

Occupational exposure to livestock and risk of tuberculosis and brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Occupational diseases are caused by zoonotic pathogens, which spread to humans through various types and intensities of human-livestock contact at work. In the present era, human brucellosis and tuberculosis remain the predominant occupational diseases throughout the world. However, the actual perce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mia, M. Mukthar, Hasan, Mahamudul, Pory, Faija Sadia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100432
_version_ 1784812869674598400
author Mia, M. Mukthar
Hasan, Mahamudul
Pory, Faija Sadia
author_facet Mia, M. Mukthar
Hasan, Mahamudul
Pory, Faija Sadia
author_sort Mia, M. Mukthar
collection PubMed
description Occupational diseases are caused by zoonotic pathogens, which spread to humans through various types and intensities of human-livestock contact at work. In the present era, human brucellosis and tuberculosis remain the predominant occupational diseases throughout the world. However, the actual percentage of reported cases that are acquired from various livestock-related occupational groups is not well known. Therefore, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous scatter studies mentioned the occurrence of human brucellosis and tuberculosis. From 2000 to 2021, a computer search of PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, BioMed and Scopus was conducted and finally we found 71 studies (brucellosis = 54, tuberculosis = 17), which were included in this meta-analysis to calculate the aggregate prevalence using the random effects model. Moreover, I(2) statistic, Cochran's Q statistic heterogeneity and subgroup analysis were also performed. The analysis of the data showed that among the various livestock-related occupational groups, the global pooled prevalence of tuberculosis was 19% (95% CI: 09–30), which was higher than brucellosis 14% (95% CI: 10–18). In addition, North America and Africa were reported as the continents of the maximum prevalence rate of 25% (95% CI: −08-58) and 16% (95% CI: 11–21) for tuberculosis and brucellosis than the other continents. Afterwards, the individual's occupation was broken down into the following four groups: farm worker, livestock owner, livestock connected person and abattoir worker. The significant association was found between slaughterhouse workers and brucellosis prevalence (20%; 95% CI: 13–27) as well as the livestock owners and tuberculosis prevalence (28%; 95% CI: 06–50). Likely, a maximum prevalence of tuberculosis was documented among workers ages 20 to 49 years, and of brucellosis among those between the ages of 20 and 25, which suggests that age also had a role. Therefore, it is concluded that the livestock-related occupational groups were found to be at an increased risk of adverse zoonotic disease outcomes. Future studies could be focused on specific occupational group that are in high risk of disease transmission to minimize the effect of these two hazardous pathogens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9582573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95825732022-10-21 Occupational exposure to livestock and risk of tuberculosis and brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Mia, M. Mukthar Hasan, Mahamudul Pory, Faija Sadia One Health Research Paper Occupational diseases are caused by zoonotic pathogens, which spread to humans through various types and intensities of human-livestock contact at work. In the present era, human brucellosis and tuberculosis remain the predominant occupational diseases throughout the world. However, the actual percentage of reported cases that are acquired from various livestock-related occupational groups is not well known. Therefore, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of previous scatter studies mentioned the occurrence of human brucellosis and tuberculosis. From 2000 to 2021, a computer search of PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, BioMed and Scopus was conducted and finally we found 71 studies (brucellosis = 54, tuberculosis = 17), which were included in this meta-analysis to calculate the aggregate prevalence using the random effects model. Moreover, I(2) statistic, Cochran's Q statistic heterogeneity and subgroup analysis were also performed. The analysis of the data showed that among the various livestock-related occupational groups, the global pooled prevalence of tuberculosis was 19% (95% CI: 09–30), which was higher than brucellosis 14% (95% CI: 10–18). In addition, North America and Africa were reported as the continents of the maximum prevalence rate of 25% (95% CI: −08-58) and 16% (95% CI: 11–21) for tuberculosis and brucellosis than the other continents. Afterwards, the individual's occupation was broken down into the following four groups: farm worker, livestock owner, livestock connected person and abattoir worker. The significant association was found between slaughterhouse workers and brucellosis prevalence (20%; 95% CI: 13–27) as well as the livestock owners and tuberculosis prevalence (28%; 95% CI: 06–50). Likely, a maximum prevalence of tuberculosis was documented among workers ages 20 to 49 years, and of brucellosis among those between the ages of 20 and 25, which suggests that age also had a role. Therefore, it is concluded that the livestock-related occupational groups were found to be at an increased risk of adverse zoonotic disease outcomes. Future studies could be focused on specific occupational group that are in high risk of disease transmission to minimize the effect of these two hazardous pathogens. Elsevier 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9582573/ /pubmed/36277098 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100432 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Mia, M. Mukthar
Hasan, Mahamudul
Pory, Faija Sadia
Occupational exposure to livestock and risk of tuberculosis and brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Occupational exposure to livestock and risk of tuberculosis and brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Occupational exposure to livestock and risk of tuberculosis and brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Occupational exposure to livestock and risk of tuberculosis and brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Occupational exposure to livestock and risk of tuberculosis and brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Occupational exposure to livestock and risk of tuberculosis and brucellosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort occupational exposure to livestock and risk of tuberculosis and brucellosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277098
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100432
work_keys_str_mv AT miammukthar occupationalexposuretolivestockandriskoftuberculosisandbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hasanmahamudul occupationalexposuretolivestockandriskoftuberculosisandbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT poryfaijasadia occupationalexposuretolivestockandriskoftuberculosisandbrucellosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis