Cargando…

Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION: Nicotine-replacement therapy (NRT) and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been frequently used for smoking cessation. The aim of this review is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of e-cigarettes versus NRT for smoking cessation. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jing, Hui, Xu, Fu, Jiani, Ahmed, Muhammad Muneeb, Yao, Liang, Yang, Kehu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339933
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/154075
_version_ 1784812871200276480
author Li, Jing
Hui, Xu
Fu, Jiani
Ahmed, Muhammad Muneeb
Yao, Liang
Yang, Kehu
author_facet Li, Jing
Hui, Xu
Fu, Jiani
Ahmed, Muhammad Muneeb
Yao, Liang
Yang, Kehu
author_sort Li, Jing
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Nicotine-replacement therapy (NRT) and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been frequently used for smoking cessation. The aim of this review is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of e-cigarettes versus NRT for smoking cessation. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library from inception to 10 October 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing e-cigarettes versus NRT for smoking cessation. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts for eligibility. Paired authors extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and used GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) to rate the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: The study included five RCTs with 1748 participants. The meta-analysis suggested the e-cigarettes versus NRT increased the ≥6 months continuous abstinence rate (RR=1.67; 95% CI: 1.21–2.28; 55 more per 1000 participants, low certainty), and 7-day point abstinence rate at ≥6 months follow-up (RR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.19–1.72; 84 more per 1000, low certainty). However, we found no evidence that e-cigarettes versus NRT increased 3–6 months continuous abstinence rate (RR=1.07; 95% CI: 0.73–1.57; 10 more per 1000, very low certainty) and <3 months continuous abstinence rate (RR=1.20; 95% CI: 0.90–1.60; 54 more per 1000, low certainty); similar results were found at <3 months follow-up (RR=1.19; 95% CI: 0.92–1.54; 55 more per 1000, very low certainty) and 3–6 months follow-up in 7-day point abstinence rate (RR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.70–1.44; 2 more per 1000, very low certainty). The adverse events were not significant between e-cigarettes and NRT other than throat irritation (RR=1.27; 95% CI: 1.13–1.42; 118 more per 1000, low certainty). CONCLUSIONS: E-cigarettes appeared to be superior to NRT in ≥6 months continuous abstinence rate and 7-day point abstinence rate. At short-term duration, we found no evidence that e-cigarettes compared to NRT increased the <6 months continuous abstinence rate and 7-day point abstinence rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9582581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95825812022-11-03 Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Li, Jing Hui, Xu Fu, Jiani Ahmed, Muhammad Muneeb Yao, Liang Yang, Kehu Tob Induc Dis Review Paper INTRODUCTION: Nicotine-replacement therapy (NRT) and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have been frequently used for smoking cessation. The aim of this review is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of e-cigarettes versus NRT for smoking cessation. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library from inception to 10 October 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing e-cigarettes versus NRT for smoking cessation. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts for eligibility. Paired authors extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and used GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) to rate the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: The study included five RCTs with 1748 participants. The meta-analysis suggested the e-cigarettes versus NRT increased the ≥6 months continuous abstinence rate (RR=1.67; 95% CI: 1.21–2.28; 55 more per 1000 participants, low certainty), and 7-day point abstinence rate at ≥6 months follow-up (RR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.19–1.72; 84 more per 1000, low certainty). However, we found no evidence that e-cigarettes versus NRT increased 3–6 months continuous abstinence rate (RR=1.07; 95% CI: 0.73–1.57; 10 more per 1000, very low certainty) and <3 months continuous abstinence rate (RR=1.20; 95% CI: 0.90–1.60; 54 more per 1000, low certainty); similar results were found at <3 months follow-up (RR=1.19; 95% CI: 0.92–1.54; 55 more per 1000, very low certainty) and 3–6 months follow-up in 7-day point abstinence rate (RR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.70–1.44; 2 more per 1000, very low certainty). The adverse events were not significant between e-cigarettes and NRT other than throat irritation (RR=1.27; 95% CI: 1.13–1.42; 118 more per 1000, low certainty). CONCLUSIONS: E-cigarettes appeared to be superior to NRT in ≥6 months continuous abstinence rate and 7-day point abstinence rate. At short-term duration, we found no evidence that e-cigarettes compared to NRT increased the <6 months continuous abstinence rate and 7-day point abstinence rate. European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9582581/ /pubmed/36339933 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/154075 Text en © 2022 Li J. et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Review Paper
Li, Jing
Hui, Xu
Fu, Jiani
Ahmed, Muhammad Muneeb
Yao, Liang
Yang, Kehu
Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Electronic cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort electronic cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement therapy for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339933
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/154075
work_keys_str_mv AT lijing electroniccigarettesversusnicotinereplacementtherapyforsmokingcessationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huixu electroniccigarettesversusnicotinereplacementtherapyforsmokingcessationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT fujiani electroniccigarettesversusnicotinereplacementtherapyforsmokingcessationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ahmedmuhammadmuneeb electroniccigarettesversusnicotinereplacementtherapyforsmokingcessationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yaoliang electroniccigarettesversusnicotinereplacementtherapyforsmokingcessationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yangkehu electroniccigarettesversusnicotinereplacementtherapyforsmokingcessationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials