Cargando…

The ALLgorithMM: How to define the hemodilution of bone marrow samples in lymphoproliferative diseases

INTRODUCTION: Minimal residual disease (MRD) is commonly assessed in bone marrow (BM) aspirate. However, sample quality can impair the MRD measurement, leading to underestimated residual cells and to false negative results. To define a reliable and reproducible method for the assessment of BM hemodi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vigliotta, Ilaria, Armuzzi, Silvia, Barone, Martina, Solli, Vincenza, Pistis, Ignazia, Borsi, Enrica, Taurisano, Barbara, Mazzocchetti, Gaia, Martello, Marina, Poletti, Andrea, Sartor, Chiara, Rizzello, Ilaria, Pantani, Lucia, Tacchetti, Paola, Papayannidis, Cristina, Mancuso, Katia, Rocchi, Serena, Zamagni, Elena, Curti, Antonio, Arpinati, Mario, Cavo, Michele, Terragna, Carolina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36276072
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1001048
_version_ 1784812875430232064
author Vigliotta, Ilaria
Armuzzi, Silvia
Barone, Martina
Solli, Vincenza
Pistis, Ignazia
Borsi, Enrica
Taurisano, Barbara
Mazzocchetti, Gaia
Martello, Marina
Poletti, Andrea
Sartor, Chiara
Rizzello, Ilaria
Pantani, Lucia
Tacchetti, Paola
Papayannidis, Cristina
Mancuso, Katia
Rocchi, Serena
Zamagni, Elena
Curti, Antonio
Arpinati, Mario
Cavo, Michele
Terragna, Carolina
author_facet Vigliotta, Ilaria
Armuzzi, Silvia
Barone, Martina
Solli, Vincenza
Pistis, Ignazia
Borsi, Enrica
Taurisano, Barbara
Mazzocchetti, Gaia
Martello, Marina
Poletti, Andrea
Sartor, Chiara
Rizzello, Ilaria
Pantani, Lucia
Tacchetti, Paola
Papayannidis, Cristina
Mancuso, Katia
Rocchi, Serena
Zamagni, Elena
Curti, Antonio
Arpinati, Mario
Cavo, Michele
Terragna, Carolina
author_sort Vigliotta, Ilaria
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Minimal residual disease (MRD) is commonly assessed in bone marrow (BM) aspirate. However, sample quality can impair the MRD measurement, leading to underestimated residual cells and to false negative results. To define a reliable and reproducible method for the assessment of BM hemodilution, several flow cytometry (FC) strategies for hemodilution evaluation have been compared. METHODS: For each BM sample, cells populations with a well-known distribution in BM and peripheral blood - e.g., mast cells (MC), immature (IG) and mature granulocytes (N) – have been studied by FC and quantified alongside the BM differential count. RESULTS: The frequencies of cells’ populations were correlated to the IG/N ratio, highlighting a mild correlation with MCs and erythroblasts (R=0.25 and R=0.38 respectively, with p-value=0.0006 and 0.0000052), whereas no significant correlation was found with B or T-cells. The mild correlation between IG/N, erythroblasts and MCs supported the combined use of these parameters to evaluate BM hemodilution, hence the optimization of the ALLgorithMM. Once validated, the ALLgorithMM was employed to evaluate the dilution status of BM samples in the context of MRD assessment. Overall, we found that 32% of FC and 52% of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) analyses were MRD negative in samples resulted hemodiluted (HD) or at least mildly hemodiluted (mHD). CONCLUSIONS: The high frequency of MRD-negative results in both HD and mHD samples implies the presence of possible false negative MRD measurements, impairing the correct assessment of patients’ response to therapy and highlighs the importance to evaluate BM hemodilution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9582597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95825972022-10-21 The ALLgorithMM: How to define the hemodilution of bone marrow samples in lymphoproliferative diseases Vigliotta, Ilaria Armuzzi, Silvia Barone, Martina Solli, Vincenza Pistis, Ignazia Borsi, Enrica Taurisano, Barbara Mazzocchetti, Gaia Martello, Marina Poletti, Andrea Sartor, Chiara Rizzello, Ilaria Pantani, Lucia Tacchetti, Paola Papayannidis, Cristina Mancuso, Katia Rocchi, Serena Zamagni, Elena Curti, Antonio Arpinati, Mario Cavo, Michele Terragna, Carolina Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Minimal residual disease (MRD) is commonly assessed in bone marrow (BM) aspirate. However, sample quality can impair the MRD measurement, leading to underestimated residual cells and to false negative results. To define a reliable and reproducible method for the assessment of BM hemodilution, several flow cytometry (FC) strategies for hemodilution evaluation have been compared. METHODS: For each BM sample, cells populations with a well-known distribution in BM and peripheral blood - e.g., mast cells (MC), immature (IG) and mature granulocytes (N) – have been studied by FC and quantified alongside the BM differential count. RESULTS: The frequencies of cells’ populations were correlated to the IG/N ratio, highlighting a mild correlation with MCs and erythroblasts (R=0.25 and R=0.38 respectively, with p-value=0.0006 and 0.0000052), whereas no significant correlation was found with B or T-cells. The mild correlation between IG/N, erythroblasts and MCs supported the combined use of these parameters to evaluate BM hemodilution, hence the optimization of the ALLgorithMM. Once validated, the ALLgorithMM was employed to evaluate the dilution status of BM samples in the context of MRD assessment. Overall, we found that 32% of FC and 52% of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) analyses were MRD negative in samples resulted hemodiluted (HD) or at least mildly hemodiluted (mHD). CONCLUSIONS: The high frequency of MRD-negative results in both HD and mHD samples implies the presence of possible false negative MRD measurements, impairing the correct assessment of patients’ response to therapy and highlighs the importance to evaluate BM hemodilution. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9582597/ /pubmed/36276072 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1001048 Text en Copyright © 2022 Vigliotta, Armuzzi, Barone, Solli, Pistis, Borsi, Taurisano, Mazzocchetti, Martello, Poletti, Sartor, Rizzello, Pantani, Tacchetti, Papayannidis, Mancuso, Rocchi, Zamagni, Curti, Arpinati, Cavo and Terragna https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Vigliotta, Ilaria
Armuzzi, Silvia
Barone, Martina
Solli, Vincenza
Pistis, Ignazia
Borsi, Enrica
Taurisano, Barbara
Mazzocchetti, Gaia
Martello, Marina
Poletti, Andrea
Sartor, Chiara
Rizzello, Ilaria
Pantani, Lucia
Tacchetti, Paola
Papayannidis, Cristina
Mancuso, Katia
Rocchi, Serena
Zamagni, Elena
Curti, Antonio
Arpinati, Mario
Cavo, Michele
Terragna, Carolina
The ALLgorithMM: How to define the hemodilution of bone marrow samples in lymphoproliferative diseases
title The ALLgorithMM: How to define the hemodilution of bone marrow samples in lymphoproliferative diseases
title_full The ALLgorithMM: How to define the hemodilution of bone marrow samples in lymphoproliferative diseases
title_fullStr The ALLgorithMM: How to define the hemodilution of bone marrow samples in lymphoproliferative diseases
title_full_unstemmed The ALLgorithMM: How to define the hemodilution of bone marrow samples in lymphoproliferative diseases
title_short The ALLgorithMM: How to define the hemodilution of bone marrow samples in lymphoproliferative diseases
title_sort allgorithmm: how to define the hemodilution of bone marrow samples in lymphoproliferative diseases
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36276072
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1001048
work_keys_str_mv AT vigliottailaria theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT armuzzisilvia theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT baronemartina theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT sollivincenza theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT pistisignazia theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT borsienrica theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT taurisanobarbara theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT mazzocchettigaia theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT martellomarina theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT polettiandrea theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT sartorchiara theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT rizzelloilaria theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT pantanilucia theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT tacchettipaola theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT papayannidiscristina theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT mancusokatia theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT rocchiserena theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT zamagnielena theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT curtiantonio theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT arpinatimario theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT cavomichele theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT terragnacarolina theallgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT vigliottailaria allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT armuzzisilvia allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT baronemartina allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT sollivincenza allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT pistisignazia allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT borsienrica allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT taurisanobarbara allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT mazzocchettigaia allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT martellomarina allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT polettiandrea allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT sartorchiara allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT rizzelloilaria allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT pantanilucia allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT tacchettipaola allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT papayannidiscristina allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT mancusokatia allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT rocchiserena allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT zamagnielena allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT curtiantonio allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT arpinatimario allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT cavomichele allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases
AT terragnacarolina allgorithmmhowtodefinethehemodilutionofbonemarrowsamplesinlymphoproliferativediseases