Cargando…

Health-related quality of life of salvage prostate reirradiation using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with urethral-sparing

PURPOSE: To explore whether prostate motion mitigation using the rectal distension-mediated technique is safe and effective in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) salvage treatment of intraprostatic cancer recurrences following initial radiotherapy for primary prostate cancer. MATERIALS A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greco, Carlo, Pares, Oriol, Pimentel, Nuno, Louro, Vasco, Nunes, Beatriz, Kociolek, Justyna, Marques, Joao, Fuks, Zvi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36276100
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.984917
_version_ 1784812877989806080
author Greco, Carlo
Pares, Oriol
Pimentel, Nuno
Louro, Vasco
Nunes, Beatriz
Kociolek, Justyna
Marques, Joao
Fuks, Zvi
author_facet Greco, Carlo
Pares, Oriol
Pimentel, Nuno
Louro, Vasco
Nunes, Beatriz
Kociolek, Justyna
Marques, Joao
Fuks, Zvi
author_sort Greco, Carlo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To explore whether prostate motion mitigation using the rectal distension-mediated technique is safe and effective in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) salvage treatment of intraprostatic cancer recurrences following initial radiotherapy for primary prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2013 and December 2020, 30 patients received salvage SABR for (68)Ga- PSMA-11 PET/CT-detected intra-prostatic relapses. Median time from primary RT to salvage reirradiation was 70.2 (IQR, 51.3-116.0) months. Median PSA at retreatment was 3.6 ng/mL (IQR, 1.9-6.2). Rectal distension-mediated SABR was achieved with a 150-cm(3) air-inflated endorectal balloon and a Foley catheter loaded with 3 beacon transponders was used for urethra visualization and on-line tracking. MRI-based planning employed a 2-mm expansion around the planned target volume (PTV), reduced to 0-mm at the interface with critical organs at risk (OARs). Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) permitted a 20% dose reduction of the urethra. VMAT simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of the dominant intraprostatic lesion was deployed when indicated. Median SABR dose was 35 Gy (7 Gy per fraction over 5 consecutive days; range 35-40 Gy). Toxicity assessment used CTCAE v.4 criteria. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 44 months (IQR, 18-60). The actuarial 3- and 4-year biochemical relapse free survival was 53.4% and 47.5%, respectively. Intraprostatic post-salvage relapse by PSMA PET/CT was 53.3%. Acute grade 2 and 3 genitourinary (GU) toxicities were 20% and 0%, respectively. There were no instances of acute grade ≥2 rectal (GI) toxicity. Late grade 2 and 3 GU toxicities occurred in 13.3% and 0% of patients, respectively. There were no instances of grade ≥2 late rectal toxicity. Patient-reported QOL measures showed an acute transient deterioration in the urinary domain 1 month after treatment but returned to baseline values at 3 months. The median IPSS scores rose over baseline (≥5 points in 53% of patients) between month 6 and 12 post-treatment as a result of urinary symptoms flare, eventually receding at 18 months. The bowel domain metrics had no appreciable changes over time. CONCLUSION: Pursuit of local control in intraprostatic failures is feasible and can be achieved with an acceptably low toxicity profile associated with effective OAR sparing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9582606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95826062022-10-21 Health-related quality of life of salvage prostate reirradiation using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with urethral-sparing Greco, Carlo Pares, Oriol Pimentel, Nuno Louro, Vasco Nunes, Beatriz Kociolek, Justyna Marques, Joao Fuks, Zvi Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: To explore whether prostate motion mitigation using the rectal distension-mediated technique is safe and effective in stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) salvage treatment of intraprostatic cancer recurrences following initial radiotherapy for primary prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2013 and December 2020, 30 patients received salvage SABR for (68)Ga- PSMA-11 PET/CT-detected intra-prostatic relapses. Median time from primary RT to salvage reirradiation was 70.2 (IQR, 51.3-116.0) months. Median PSA at retreatment was 3.6 ng/mL (IQR, 1.9-6.2). Rectal distension-mediated SABR was achieved with a 150-cm(3) air-inflated endorectal balloon and a Foley catheter loaded with 3 beacon transponders was used for urethra visualization and on-line tracking. MRI-based planning employed a 2-mm expansion around the planned target volume (PTV), reduced to 0-mm at the interface with critical organs at risk (OARs). Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) permitted a 20% dose reduction of the urethra. VMAT simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of the dominant intraprostatic lesion was deployed when indicated. Median SABR dose was 35 Gy (7 Gy per fraction over 5 consecutive days; range 35-40 Gy). Toxicity assessment used CTCAE v.4 criteria. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 44 months (IQR, 18-60). The actuarial 3- and 4-year biochemical relapse free survival was 53.4% and 47.5%, respectively. Intraprostatic post-salvage relapse by PSMA PET/CT was 53.3%. Acute grade 2 and 3 genitourinary (GU) toxicities were 20% and 0%, respectively. There were no instances of acute grade ≥2 rectal (GI) toxicity. Late grade 2 and 3 GU toxicities occurred in 13.3% and 0% of patients, respectively. There were no instances of grade ≥2 late rectal toxicity. Patient-reported QOL measures showed an acute transient deterioration in the urinary domain 1 month after treatment but returned to baseline values at 3 months. The median IPSS scores rose over baseline (≥5 points in 53% of patients) between month 6 and 12 post-treatment as a result of urinary symptoms flare, eventually receding at 18 months. The bowel domain metrics had no appreciable changes over time. CONCLUSION: Pursuit of local control in intraprostatic failures is feasible and can be achieved with an acceptably low toxicity profile associated with effective OAR sparing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9582606/ /pubmed/36276100 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.984917 Text en Copyright © 2022 Greco, Pares, Pimentel, Louro, Nunes, Kociolek, Marques and Fuks https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Greco, Carlo
Pares, Oriol
Pimentel, Nuno
Louro, Vasco
Nunes, Beatriz
Kociolek, Justyna
Marques, Joao
Fuks, Zvi
Health-related quality of life of salvage prostate reirradiation using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with urethral-sparing
title Health-related quality of life of salvage prostate reirradiation using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with urethral-sparing
title_full Health-related quality of life of salvage prostate reirradiation using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with urethral-sparing
title_fullStr Health-related quality of life of salvage prostate reirradiation using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with urethral-sparing
title_full_unstemmed Health-related quality of life of salvage prostate reirradiation using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with urethral-sparing
title_short Health-related quality of life of salvage prostate reirradiation using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with urethral-sparing
title_sort health-related quality of life of salvage prostate reirradiation using stereotactic ablative radiotherapy with urethral-sparing
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36276100
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.984917
work_keys_str_mv AT grecocarlo healthrelatedqualityoflifeofsalvageprostatereirradiationusingstereotacticablativeradiotherapywithurethralsparing
AT paresoriol healthrelatedqualityoflifeofsalvageprostatereirradiationusingstereotacticablativeradiotherapywithurethralsparing
AT pimentelnuno healthrelatedqualityoflifeofsalvageprostatereirradiationusingstereotacticablativeradiotherapywithurethralsparing
AT lourovasco healthrelatedqualityoflifeofsalvageprostatereirradiationusingstereotacticablativeradiotherapywithurethralsparing
AT nunesbeatriz healthrelatedqualityoflifeofsalvageprostatereirradiationusingstereotacticablativeradiotherapywithurethralsparing
AT kociolekjustyna healthrelatedqualityoflifeofsalvageprostatereirradiationusingstereotacticablativeradiotherapywithurethralsparing
AT marquesjoao healthrelatedqualityoflifeofsalvageprostatereirradiationusingstereotacticablativeradiotherapywithurethralsparing
AT fukszvi healthrelatedqualityoflifeofsalvageprostatereirradiationusingstereotacticablativeradiotherapywithurethralsparing