Cargando…

Better or worse? The prognostic role of the mesenchymal subtype in patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: Tumor characteristics can be prognostically relevant in patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). This study aimed to determine whether different subtypes of HGSOC, especially the mesenchymal subtype, are associated with overall survival (OS) or progression‐free survival...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Juan, Shi, Xiaoyan, Xiao, Lan, Li, Zelian, Li, Zhimin, Sun, Lei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35434908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4752
_version_ 1784812897057112064
author Chen, Juan
Shi, Xiaoyan
Xiao, Lan
Li, Zelian
Li, Zhimin
Sun, Lei
author_facet Chen, Juan
Shi, Xiaoyan
Xiao, Lan
Li, Zelian
Li, Zhimin
Sun, Lei
author_sort Chen, Juan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tumor characteristics can be prognostically relevant in patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). This study aimed to determine whether different subtypes of HGSOC, especially the mesenchymal subtype, are associated with overall survival (OS) or progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with HGSOC. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published up to September 2020. The eligibility criteria were (1) population: patients with HGSOG with molecular subtyping of their tumor, (2) exposure: mesenchymal subtype, (3) non‐exposure: differentiated, immunoreactive, proliferative, and other non‐mesenchymal subtypes, (4) outcome: survival, with hazard ratios (HRs), and (5) English language. RESULTS: The mesenchymal subtype showed no statistically significant difference in OS compared with the immunoreactive subtype (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 0.78–2.78, p = 0.238; I (2) = 81.2%, p (heterogeneity) = 0.005) or all non‐mesenchymal subtypes (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 0.97–2.80, p = 0.063; I (2) = 79.4%, p (heterogeneity) = 0.008). The mesenchymal subtype showed no statistically significant difference in PFS compared with the immunoreactive subtype (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.71–2.00, p = 0.514; I (2) = 71.6%, p (heterogeneity) = 0.030) but a significant differences was observed when using all non‐mesenchymal subtypes as reference (HR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.00–2.28, p = 0.049). The results were robust according to the sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: There are no statistically significant differences in OS between the mesenchymal subtype of HGSOC and other subtypes of HGSOC. Because of statistical power, this meta‐analysis cannot conclude about non‐inferiority, and the relationship between the molecular subtypes and HGSOC prognosis remains controversial. Based on one study, the mesenchymal subtype could have a poorer PFS than the non‐mesenchymal subtypes of HGSOC, but this conclusion requires further evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9582683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95826832022-10-21 Better or worse? The prognostic role of the mesenchymal subtype in patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Chen, Juan Shi, Xiaoyan Xiao, Lan Li, Zelian Li, Zhimin Sun, Lei Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Tumor characteristics can be prognostically relevant in patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). This study aimed to determine whether different subtypes of HGSOC, especially the mesenchymal subtype, are associated with overall survival (OS) or progression‐free survival (PFS) in patients with HGSOC. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published up to September 2020. The eligibility criteria were (1) population: patients with HGSOG with molecular subtyping of their tumor, (2) exposure: mesenchymal subtype, (3) non‐exposure: differentiated, immunoreactive, proliferative, and other non‐mesenchymal subtypes, (4) outcome: survival, with hazard ratios (HRs), and (5) English language. RESULTS: The mesenchymal subtype showed no statistically significant difference in OS compared with the immunoreactive subtype (HR = 1.47, 95% CI: 0.78–2.78, p = 0.238; I (2) = 81.2%, p (heterogeneity) = 0.005) or all non‐mesenchymal subtypes (HR = 1.65, 95% CI: 0.97–2.80, p = 0.063; I (2) = 79.4%, p (heterogeneity) = 0.008). The mesenchymal subtype showed no statistically significant difference in PFS compared with the immunoreactive subtype (HR = 1.19, 95% CI: 0.71–2.00, p = 0.514; I (2) = 71.6%, p (heterogeneity) = 0.030) but a significant differences was observed when using all non‐mesenchymal subtypes as reference (HR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.00–2.28, p = 0.049). The results were robust according to the sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: There are no statistically significant differences in OS between the mesenchymal subtype of HGSOC and other subtypes of HGSOC. Because of statistical power, this meta‐analysis cannot conclude about non‐inferiority, and the relationship between the molecular subtypes and HGSOC prognosis remains controversial. Based on one study, the mesenchymal subtype could have a poorer PFS than the non‐mesenchymal subtypes of HGSOC, but this conclusion requires further evidence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9582683/ /pubmed/35434908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4752 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Chen, Juan
Shi, Xiaoyan
Xiao, Lan
Li, Zelian
Li, Zhimin
Sun, Lei
Better or worse? The prognostic role of the mesenchymal subtype in patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Better or worse? The prognostic role of the mesenchymal subtype in patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Better or worse? The prognostic role of the mesenchymal subtype in patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Better or worse? The prognostic role of the mesenchymal subtype in patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Better or worse? The prognostic role of the mesenchymal subtype in patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Better or worse? The prognostic role of the mesenchymal subtype in patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort better or worse? the prognostic role of the mesenchymal subtype in patients with high‐grade serous ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9582683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35434908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4752
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjuan betterorworsetheprognosticroleofthemesenchymalsubtypeinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shixiaoyan betterorworsetheprognosticroleofthemesenchymalsubtypeinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaolan betterorworsetheprognosticroleofthemesenchymalsubtypeinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lizelian betterorworsetheprognosticroleofthemesenchymalsubtypeinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lizhimin betterorworsetheprognosticroleofthemesenchymalsubtypeinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sunlei betterorworsetheprognosticroleofthemesenchymalsubtypeinpatientswithhighgradeserousovariancarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis