Cargando…

Acupuncture vs. antispasmodics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: An adjusted indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis

Background: Acupuncture has been extensively applied to manage irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in clinical practice in China. Some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated their efficacy, but it has rarely been compared with first-line antispasmodics to verify their effectiveness. Theref...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Yun-zhou, Tao, Qing-feng, Qin, Di, Chen, Min, Yu, Shu-guang, Zheng, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9583016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1001978
_version_ 1784812974374912000
author Shi, Yun-zhou
Tao, Qing-feng
Qin, Di
Chen, Min
Yu, Shu-guang
Zheng, Hui
author_facet Shi, Yun-zhou
Tao, Qing-feng
Qin, Di
Chen, Min
Yu, Shu-guang
Zheng, Hui
author_sort Shi, Yun-zhou
collection PubMed
description Background: Acupuncture has been extensively applied to manage irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in clinical practice in China. Some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated their efficacy, but it has rarely been compared with first-line antispasmodics to verify their effectiveness. Therefore, we compare acupuncture with antispasmodics in the treatment of IBS by using an adjusted indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis. Methods: Embase, OVID Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from inception to 14 March 2022, with no language restrictions. RCTs comparing antispasmodics or acupuncture with placebo or one of the antispasmodics were enrolled. The primary outcome of interest was the improvement of abdominal pain. And the secondary outcomes of interest were the relief of global IBS symptoms and adverse events. The random-effects model was utilized to pool data. The effect size was measured by standardized mean difference (SMD) or relative ratio, and the effectiveness of acupuncture and different antispasmodics were ranked by P-scores. Results: Thirty-five RCTs (n = 5,190) were included. The analysis showed that cimetropium, drotaverine, acupuncture, and pinarverium were superior over placebo in relieving abdominal pain; cimetropium (SMD, −3.00 [95%CI, −4.47 to −1.53], P-score = 0.99) ranked the most effective. In pairwise comparisons, acupuncture had a greater improvement than most antispasmodics except cimetropium and drotaverine in relieving abdominal pain, although the between-group difference was statistically insignificant. In the analysis of continuous outcome in the relief of global IBS symptoms, the result showed that pinaverium was more effective (SMD, 1.72 [95%CI, 0.53 to 2.92], P-score = 0.90) than placebo. Trimebutine and acupuncture had greater improvements than placebo, but no significant difference was shown between groups. In pairwise comparisons, acupuncture was more effective than pinaverium (SMD, −1.11 [95%CI, −1.94 to −0.28]) in relieving global IBS symptoms. In the analysis of adverse events, acupuncture had a lower adverse event rate than most of the other antispasmodics. Conclusion: Cimetropium, drotaverine, and acupuncture were all better than placebo in improving abdominal pain. Acupuncture was preferred over pinaverium in relieving global IBS symptoms, and acupuncture had lower adverse events than most antispasmodics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9583016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95830162022-10-21 Acupuncture vs. antispasmodics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: An adjusted indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis Shi, Yun-zhou Tao, Qing-feng Qin, Di Chen, Min Yu, Shu-guang Zheng, Hui Front Physiol Physiology Background: Acupuncture has been extensively applied to manage irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in clinical practice in China. Some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated their efficacy, but it has rarely been compared with first-line antispasmodics to verify their effectiveness. Therefore, we compare acupuncture with antispasmodics in the treatment of IBS by using an adjusted indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis. Methods: Embase, OVID Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from inception to 14 March 2022, with no language restrictions. RCTs comparing antispasmodics or acupuncture with placebo or one of the antispasmodics were enrolled. The primary outcome of interest was the improvement of abdominal pain. And the secondary outcomes of interest were the relief of global IBS symptoms and adverse events. The random-effects model was utilized to pool data. The effect size was measured by standardized mean difference (SMD) or relative ratio, and the effectiveness of acupuncture and different antispasmodics were ranked by P-scores. Results: Thirty-five RCTs (n = 5,190) were included. The analysis showed that cimetropium, drotaverine, acupuncture, and pinarverium were superior over placebo in relieving abdominal pain; cimetropium (SMD, −3.00 [95%CI, −4.47 to −1.53], P-score = 0.99) ranked the most effective. In pairwise comparisons, acupuncture had a greater improvement than most antispasmodics except cimetropium and drotaverine in relieving abdominal pain, although the between-group difference was statistically insignificant. In the analysis of continuous outcome in the relief of global IBS symptoms, the result showed that pinaverium was more effective (SMD, 1.72 [95%CI, 0.53 to 2.92], P-score = 0.90) than placebo. Trimebutine and acupuncture had greater improvements than placebo, but no significant difference was shown between groups. In pairwise comparisons, acupuncture was more effective than pinaverium (SMD, −1.11 [95%CI, −1.94 to −0.28]) in relieving global IBS symptoms. In the analysis of adverse events, acupuncture had a lower adverse event rate than most of the other antispasmodics. Conclusion: Cimetropium, drotaverine, and acupuncture were all better than placebo in improving abdominal pain. Acupuncture was preferred over pinaverium in relieving global IBS symptoms, and acupuncture had lower adverse events than most antispasmodics. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9583016/ /pubmed/36277191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1001978 Text en Copyright © 2022 Shi, Tao, Qin, Chen, Yu and Zheng. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Shi, Yun-zhou
Tao, Qing-feng
Qin, Di
Chen, Min
Yu, Shu-guang
Zheng, Hui
Acupuncture vs. antispasmodics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: An adjusted indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis
title Acupuncture vs. antispasmodics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: An adjusted indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis
title_full Acupuncture vs. antispasmodics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: An adjusted indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis
title_fullStr Acupuncture vs. antispasmodics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: An adjusted indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Acupuncture vs. antispasmodics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: An adjusted indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis
title_short Acupuncture vs. antispasmodics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: An adjusted indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis
title_sort acupuncture vs. antispasmodics in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: an adjusted indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9583016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1001978
work_keys_str_mv AT shiyunzhou acupuncturevsantispasmodicsinthetreatmentofirritablebowelsyndromeanadjustedindirecttreatmentcomparisonmetaanalysis
AT taoqingfeng acupuncturevsantispasmodicsinthetreatmentofirritablebowelsyndromeanadjustedindirecttreatmentcomparisonmetaanalysis
AT qindi acupuncturevsantispasmodicsinthetreatmentofirritablebowelsyndromeanadjustedindirecttreatmentcomparisonmetaanalysis
AT chenmin acupuncturevsantispasmodicsinthetreatmentofirritablebowelsyndromeanadjustedindirecttreatmentcomparisonmetaanalysis
AT yushuguang acupuncturevsantispasmodicsinthetreatmentofirritablebowelsyndromeanadjustedindirecttreatmentcomparisonmetaanalysis
AT zhenghui acupuncturevsantispasmodicsinthetreatmentofirritablebowelsyndromeanadjustedindirecttreatmentcomparisonmetaanalysis