Cargando…

Accuracy of SCORTEN in predicting mortality in toxic epidermal necrolysis

BACKGROUND: Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) patients require multi-directional and multi-disciplinary treatment. In most cases, they are hospitalised at intensive care units and require multi-directional, burn-complication preventive care. Choosing the most appropriate treatment option might be tro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strużyna, Jerzy, Surowiecka, Agnieszka, Korzeniowski, Tomasz, Korulczyk, Patrycja, Drozd, Lukasz, Stachura, Aldona, Torres, Kamil, Krajewski, Andrzej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9583545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36261833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02013-2
_version_ 1784813095322910720
author Strużyna, Jerzy
Surowiecka, Agnieszka
Korzeniowski, Tomasz
Korulczyk, Patrycja
Drozd, Lukasz
Stachura, Aldona
Torres, Kamil
Krajewski, Andrzej
author_facet Strużyna, Jerzy
Surowiecka, Agnieszka
Korzeniowski, Tomasz
Korulczyk, Patrycja
Drozd, Lukasz
Stachura, Aldona
Torres, Kamil
Krajewski, Andrzej
author_sort Strużyna, Jerzy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) patients require multi-directional and multi-disciplinary treatment. In most cases, they are hospitalised at intensive care units and require multi-directional, burn-complication preventive care. Choosing the most appropriate treatment option might be troublesome even when predicting scores are used. SCORTEN is the most renowned prognostic score for TEN patients, however, there are some data indicating that the accuracy of this test may be limited. The credibility of not just the predicted mortality risk, but also componential laboratory results and clinical features subject to debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and credibility of SCORTEN in clinical practice, on proprietary material. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 35 patients with diagnosed in histopathology TEN was performed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: day of submission before 5th day from the onset of the symptoms, full protocol of plasmaphereses and IVIGs according to our scheme. Our protocol includes cycle of plasmapheresis with frozen fresh plasma twice daily for the first 2 days following admission, and once daily for the subsequent 5 to 7 days. IVIGs were administered after the first two sessions of plasmapheresis, for 4 to 7 days. The dosage was calculated according to body weight, at 0.4 to 0.5 g/kg per dose. RESULTS: The sensitivity of SCORTEN for the analysed cohort was 100%, with a specificity of 24%. The estimated death was 41,9%, while the actual death rates were 12,5%. Our protocol improved the survival, OR = 26,57, RR = 6,34, p = 0,022. Decrease in mortality was caused by a combined treatment protocol we use- plasmaphereses with IVIGs. No independent risk factor was significant in death evaluation. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the scoring system for predicting death among TEN patients are reliable when they are high. New prognostic factors should be found to improve the evaluation of patients with low SCORTEN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9583545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95835452022-10-21 Accuracy of SCORTEN in predicting mortality in toxic epidermal necrolysis Strużyna, Jerzy Surowiecka, Agnieszka Korzeniowski, Tomasz Korulczyk, Patrycja Drozd, Lukasz Stachura, Aldona Torres, Kamil Krajewski, Andrzej BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) patients require multi-directional and multi-disciplinary treatment. In most cases, they are hospitalised at intensive care units and require multi-directional, burn-complication preventive care. Choosing the most appropriate treatment option might be troublesome even when predicting scores are used. SCORTEN is the most renowned prognostic score for TEN patients, however, there are some data indicating that the accuracy of this test may be limited. The credibility of not just the predicted mortality risk, but also componential laboratory results and clinical features subject to debate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and credibility of SCORTEN in clinical practice, on proprietary material. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 35 patients with diagnosed in histopathology TEN was performed. The inclusion criteria were as follows: day of submission before 5th day from the onset of the symptoms, full protocol of plasmaphereses and IVIGs according to our scheme. Our protocol includes cycle of plasmapheresis with frozen fresh plasma twice daily for the first 2 days following admission, and once daily for the subsequent 5 to 7 days. IVIGs were administered after the first two sessions of plasmapheresis, for 4 to 7 days. The dosage was calculated according to body weight, at 0.4 to 0.5 g/kg per dose. RESULTS: The sensitivity of SCORTEN for the analysed cohort was 100%, with a specificity of 24%. The estimated death was 41,9%, while the actual death rates were 12,5%. Our protocol improved the survival, OR = 26,57, RR = 6,34, p = 0,022. Decrease in mortality was caused by a combined treatment protocol we use- plasmaphereses with IVIGs. No independent risk factor was significant in death evaluation. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the scoring system for predicting death among TEN patients are reliable when they are high. New prognostic factors should be found to improve the evaluation of patients with low SCORTEN. BioMed Central 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9583545/ /pubmed/36261833 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02013-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Strużyna, Jerzy
Surowiecka, Agnieszka
Korzeniowski, Tomasz
Korulczyk, Patrycja
Drozd, Lukasz
Stachura, Aldona
Torres, Kamil
Krajewski, Andrzej
Accuracy of SCORTEN in predicting mortality in toxic epidermal necrolysis
title Accuracy of SCORTEN in predicting mortality in toxic epidermal necrolysis
title_full Accuracy of SCORTEN in predicting mortality in toxic epidermal necrolysis
title_fullStr Accuracy of SCORTEN in predicting mortality in toxic epidermal necrolysis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of SCORTEN in predicting mortality in toxic epidermal necrolysis
title_short Accuracy of SCORTEN in predicting mortality in toxic epidermal necrolysis
title_sort accuracy of scorten in predicting mortality in toxic epidermal necrolysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9583545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36261833
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-02013-2
work_keys_str_mv AT struzynajerzy accuracyofscorteninpredictingmortalityintoxicepidermalnecrolysis
AT surowieckaagnieszka accuracyofscorteninpredictingmortalityintoxicepidermalnecrolysis
AT korzeniowskitomasz accuracyofscorteninpredictingmortalityintoxicepidermalnecrolysis
AT korulczykpatrycja accuracyofscorteninpredictingmortalityintoxicepidermalnecrolysis
AT drozdlukasz accuracyofscorteninpredictingmortalityintoxicepidermalnecrolysis
AT stachuraaldona accuracyofscorteninpredictingmortalityintoxicepidermalnecrolysis
AT torreskamil accuracyofscorteninpredictingmortalityintoxicepidermalnecrolysis
AT krajewskiandrzej accuracyofscorteninpredictingmortalityintoxicepidermalnecrolysis