Cargando…

Parity of esteem and systems thinking: a theory informed qualitative inductive thematic analysis

BACKGROUND: Parity of Esteem (PoE) is about equality between mental and physical health but is a term lacking definition and clarity. The complexity of the field of mental health and the conversations around PoE add to its opacity. Therefore, the aim of this study is to use systems thinking to explo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owens, Janine, Lovell, Karina, Brown, Abigail, Bee, Penny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9583593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36261819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04299-y
_version_ 1784813105471029248
author Owens, Janine
Lovell, Karina
Brown, Abigail
Bee, Penny
author_facet Owens, Janine
Lovell, Karina
Brown, Abigail
Bee, Penny
author_sort Owens, Janine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Parity of Esteem (PoE) is about equality between mental and physical health but is a term lacking definition and clarity. The complexity of the field of mental health and the conversations around PoE add to its opacity. Therefore, the aim of this study is to use systems thinking to explore the strengths and challenges of using PoE. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of descriptive qualitative data, from 27 qualitative interviews, utilising the World Health Organisation (WHO) system domains as a framework for the inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Examining the current strengths and challenges of systems in mental and physical healthcare using the WHO domains and macro, meso and micro levels, identifies specific actions to redress inequity between mental and physical health provision. CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests that moving PoE from rhetoric towards reality requires new configurations with a systems orientation, which uses macro, meso and micro levels to analyse and understand the complexity of relations within and between domain levels and reorienting funding, training and measurement. This requires embedding new competencies, infrastructures and practices within an effective learning healthcare system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9583593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95835932022-10-21 Parity of esteem and systems thinking: a theory informed qualitative inductive thematic analysis Owens, Janine Lovell, Karina Brown, Abigail Bee, Penny BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: Parity of Esteem (PoE) is about equality between mental and physical health but is a term lacking definition and clarity. The complexity of the field of mental health and the conversations around PoE add to its opacity. Therefore, the aim of this study is to use systems thinking to explore the strengths and challenges of using PoE. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of descriptive qualitative data, from 27 qualitative interviews, utilising the World Health Organisation (WHO) system domains as a framework for the inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Examining the current strengths and challenges of systems in mental and physical healthcare using the WHO domains and macro, meso and micro levels, identifies specific actions to redress inequity between mental and physical health provision. CONCLUSION: The evidence suggests that moving PoE from rhetoric towards reality requires new configurations with a systems orientation, which uses macro, meso and micro levels to analyse and understand the complexity of relations within and between domain levels and reorienting funding, training and measurement. This requires embedding new competencies, infrastructures and practices within an effective learning healthcare system. BioMed Central 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9583593/ /pubmed/36261819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04299-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Owens, Janine
Lovell, Karina
Brown, Abigail
Bee, Penny
Parity of esteem and systems thinking: a theory informed qualitative inductive thematic analysis
title Parity of esteem and systems thinking: a theory informed qualitative inductive thematic analysis
title_full Parity of esteem and systems thinking: a theory informed qualitative inductive thematic analysis
title_fullStr Parity of esteem and systems thinking: a theory informed qualitative inductive thematic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Parity of esteem and systems thinking: a theory informed qualitative inductive thematic analysis
title_short Parity of esteem and systems thinking: a theory informed qualitative inductive thematic analysis
title_sort parity of esteem and systems thinking: a theory informed qualitative inductive thematic analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9583593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36261819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04299-y
work_keys_str_mv AT owensjanine parityofesteemandsystemsthinkingatheoryinformedqualitativeinductivethematicanalysis
AT lovellkarina parityofesteemandsystemsthinkingatheoryinformedqualitativeinductivethematicanalysis
AT brownabigail parityofesteemandsystemsthinkingatheoryinformedqualitativeinductivethematicanalysis
AT beepenny parityofesteemandsystemsthinkingatheoryinformedqualitativeinductivethematicanalysis