Cargando…
Insight into the Process and Mechanism of Water–Rock Interaction in Underground Coal Mine Reservoirs Based on Indoor Static Simulation Experiments
[Image: see text] During the storage of underground water reservoirs in coal mines, water–rock interaction occurred between mine water and collapsed rocks, resulting in improved mine water quality, but the water–rock process and mechanism have not been clarified. In this study, six sets of simulated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9583642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36278070 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04161 |
Sumario: | [Image: see text] During the storage of underground water reservoirs in coal mines, water–rock interaction occurred between mine water and collapsed rocks, resulting in improved mine water quality, but the water–rock process and mechanism have not been clarified. In this study, six sets of simulated experiments were designed to investigate the water–rock interaction between two types of roof collapse rocks and different water samples in the Daliuta coal mine. The ion ratio method and multivariate statistics are used to reveal the process and mechanism of water–rock interaction during the experimental process from the perspective of input and output water chemical characteristics and rock properties, respectively. The results show that the ion concentration of the effluent water is controlled by water–rock interaction, and the water–rock process mainly involves the dissolution of halite, silicate, pyrite, calcite, dolomite, magnesia chlorite, and gypsum precipitation and is accompanied by ion exchange. Mineral dissolution and precipitation are the most important factors affecting the ion abundance in the effluent. There are differences in the reaction rate, degree of reaction, and dissolution process during the experimental process of fine sandstone and mudstone. Fine sandstone is more reactive than mudstone in terms of reaction rate and degree of reaction, and fine sandstone is dissolved from surface pores to inside and around, while mudstone is generated in new dissolved pores. We found that rock type, ion concentration in the input water, and rock reaction period influence the water–rock interaction during the experiment. The results provide a reference for clarifying the water–rock interaction during the storage of underground water reservoirs in coal mines and predicting the water quality of the effluent. |
---|