Cargando…
Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes
BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) followed by immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is the optimal surgical treatment for breast cancer. However, investigations are ongoing to improve the surgical technique to achieve better results. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of modified NS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9583667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1001019 |
_version_ | 1784813122981199872 |
---|---|
author | Najmiddinov, Bakhtiyor Park, Joseph Kyu-hyung Yoon, Kyung-Hwak Myung, Yujin Koh, Hyoung Won Lee, Ok Hee Hoon, Jeong Jae Shin, Hee Chul Kim, Eun-Kyu Heo, Chan Yeong |
author_facet | Najmiddinov, Bakhtiyor Park, Joseph Kyu-hyung Yoon, Kyung-Hwak Myung, Yujin Koh, Hyoung Won Lee, Ok Hee Hoon, Jeong Jae Shin, Hee Chul Kim, Eun-Kyu Heo, Chan Yeong |
author_sort | Najmiddinov, Bakhtiyor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) followed by immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is the optimal surgical treatment for breast cancer. However, investigations are ongoing to improve the surgical technique to achieve better results. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of modified NSM (m-NSM), which preserves the anterior lamellar fat layer, in patients who underwent IBR. METHODS: All patients who underwent modified NSM (m-NSM) or conventional NSM (c-NSM) followed by IBR using autologous tissue or implants were retrospectively reviewed between January 2014 and January 2021. Two mastectomy types were compared in terms of postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes using panel assessment scores by physicians and reported outcomes using Breast-Q. In addition, postoperative evaluations of the thickness of mastectomy flap was performed using CT scan images. RESULTS: A total of 516 patients (580 breasts) with NSM (143 breasts with c-NSM and 437 breasts with m-NSM) followed by IBR were reviewed. The mean ± SD flap thickness was 8.48 ± 1.81 mm in patients who underwent m-NSM, while it was 6.32 ± 1.15 mm in the c-NSM cohort (p = 0.02). The overall major complications rate was lower in the m-NSM group (3.0% vs. 9.0%, p < 0.013). Ischemic complications of the mastectomy flap and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) were more in c-NSM, although the difference was not statistically significant. The mean panel assessment scores were higher in the m-NSM group (3.14 (good) and 2.38 (fair) in the m-NSM and c-NSM groups, respectively; p < 0.001). Moreover, m-NSM was associated with greater improvements in psychosocial (p < 0.001) and sexual (p = 0.007) well-being. CONCLUSION: Preserving the anterior lamellar fat in NSM was associated with thicker mastectomy flap, overall lower rates of complications, including ischemia of the mastectomy flap and nipple-areolar complex, and was associated with better aesthetic outcomes and improved quality of life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9583667 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95836672022-10-21 Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes Najmiddinov, Bakhtiyor Park, Joseph Kyu-hyung Yoon, Kyung-Hwak Myung, Yujin Koh, Hyoung Won Lee, Ok Hee Hoon, Jeong Jae Shin, Hee Chul Kim, Eun-Kyu Heo, Chan Yeong Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) followed by immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is the optimal surgical treatment for breast cancer. However, investigations are ongoing to improve the surgical technique to achieve better results. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of modified NSM (m-NSM), which preserves the anterior lamellar fat layer, in patients who underwent IBR. METHODS: All patients who underwent modified NSM (m-NSM) or conventional NSM (c-NSM) followed by IBR using autologous tissue or implants were retrospectively reviewed between January 2014 and January 2021. Two mastectomy types were compared in terms of postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes using panel assessment scores by physicians and reported outcomes using Breast-Q. In addition, postoperative evaluations of the thickness of mastectomy flap was performed using CT scan images. RESULTS: A total of 516 patients (580 breasts) with NSM (143 breasts with c-NSM and 437 breasts with m-NSM) followed by IBR were reviewed. The mean ± SD flap thickness was 8.48 ± 1.81 mm in patients who underwent m-NSM, while it was 6.32 ± 1.15 mm in the c-NSM cohort (p = 0.02). The overall major complications rate was lower in the m-NSM group (3.0% vs. 9.0%, p < 0.013). Ischemic complications of the mastectomy flap and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) were more in c-NSM, although the difference was not statistically significant. The mean panel assessment scores were higher in the m-NSM group (3.14 (good) and 2.38 (fair) in the m-NSM and c-NSM groups, respectively; p < 0.001). Moreover, m-NSM was associated with greater improvements in psychosocial (p < 0.001) and sexual (p = 0.007) well-being. CONCLUSION: Preserving the anterior lamellar fat in NSM was associated with thicker mastectomy flap, overall lower rates of complications, including ischemia of the mastectomy flap and nipple-areolar complex, and was associated with better aesthetic outcomes and improved quality of life. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9583667/ /pubmed/36277278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1001019 Text en © 2022 Najmiddinov, Park, Yoon, Myung, Koh, Lee, Hoon, Shin, Kim and Heo. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Najmiddinov, Bakhtiyor Park, Joseph Kyu-hyung Yoon, Kyung-Hwak Myung, Yujin Koh, Hyoung Won Lee, Ok Hee Hoon, Jeong Jae Shin, Hee Chul Kim, Eun-Kyu Heo, Chan Yeong Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes |
title | Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes |
title_full | Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes |
title_fullStr | Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes |
title_short | Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes |
title_sort | conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9583667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1001019 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT najmiddinovbakhtiyor conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes AT parkjosephkyuhyung conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes AT yoonkyunghwak conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes AT myungyujin conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes AT kohhyoungwon conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes AT leeokhee conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes AT hoonjeongjae conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes AT shinheechul conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes AT kimeunkyu conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes AT heochanyeong conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes |