Cargando…

Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) followed by immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is the optimal surgical treatment for breast cancer. However, investigations are ongoing to improve the surgical technique to achieve better results. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of modified NS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Najmiddinov, Bakhtiyor, Park, Joseph Kyu-hyung, Yoon, Kyung-Hwak, Myung, Yujin, Koh, Hyoung Won, Lee, Ok Hee, Hoon, Jeong Jae, Shin, Hee Chul, Kim, Eun-Kyu, Heo, Chan Yeong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9583667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277278
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1001019
_version_ 1784813122981199872
author Najmiddinov, Bakhtiyor
Park, Joseph Kyu-hyung
Yoon, Kyung-Hwak
Myung, Yujin
Koh, Hyoung Won
Lee, Ok Hee
Hoon, Jeong Jae
Shin, Hee Chul
Kim, Eun-Kyu
Heo, Chan Yeong
author_facet Najmiddinov, Bakhtiyor
Park, Joseph Kyu-hyung
Yoon, Kyung-Hwak
Myung, Yujin
Koh, Hyoung Won
Lee, Ok Hee
Hoon, Jeong Jae
Shin, Hee Chul
Kim, Eun-Kyu
Heo, Chan Yeong
author_sort Najmiddinov, Bakhtiyor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) followed by immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is the optimal surgical treatment for breast cancer. However, investigations are ongoing to improve the surgical technique to achieve better results. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of modified NSM (m-NSM), which preserves the anterior lamellar fat layer, in patients who underwent IBR. METHODS: All patients who underwent modified NSM (m-NSM) or conventional NSM (c-NSM) followed by IBR using autologous tissue or implants were retrospectively reviewed between January 2014 and January 2021. Two mastectomy types were compared in terms of postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes using panel assessment scores by physicians and reported outcomes using Breast-Q. In addition, postoperative evaluations of the thickness of mastectomy flap was performed using CT scan images. RESULTS: A total of 516 patients (580 breasts) with NSM (143 breasts with c-NSM and 437 breasts with m-NSM) followed by IBR were reviewed. The mean ± SD flap thickness was 8.48 ± 1.81 mm in patients who underwent m-NSM, while it was 6.32 ± 1.15 mm in the c-NSM cohort (p = 0.02). The overall major complications rate was lower in the m-NSM group (3.0% vs. 9.0%, p < 0.013). Ischemic complications of the mastectomy flap and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) were more in c-NSM, although the difference was not statistically significant. The mean panel assessment scores were higher in the m-NSM group (3.14 (good) and 2.38 (fair) in the m-NSM and c-NSM groups, respectively; p < 0.001). Moreover, m-NSM was associated with greater improvements in psychosocial (p < 0.001) and sexual (p = 0.007) well-being. CONCLUSION: Preserving the anterior lamellar fat in NSM was associated with thicker mastectomy flap, overall lower rates of complications, including ischemia of the mastectomy flap and nipple-areolar complex, and was associated with better aesthetic outcomes and improved quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9583667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95836672022-10-21 Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes Najmiddinov, Bakhtiyor Park, Joseph Kyu-hyung Yoon, Kyung-Hwak Myung, Yujin Koh, Hyoung Won Lee, Ok Hee Hoon, Jeong Jae Shin, Hee Chul Kim, Eun-Kyu Heo, Chan Yeong Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) followed by immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is the optimal surgical treatment for breast cancer. However, investigations are ongoing to improve the surgical technique to achieve better results. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of modified NSM (m-NSM), which preserves the anterior lamellar fat layer, in patients who underwent IBR. METHODS: All patients who underwent modified NSM (m-NSM) or conventional NSM (c-NSM) followed by IBR using autologous tissue or implants were retrospectively reviewed between January 2014 and January 2021. Two mastectomy types were compared in terms of postoperative complications and aesthetic outcomes using panel assessment scores by physicians and reported outcomes using Breast-Q. In addition, postoperative evaluations of the thickness of mastectomy flap was performed using CT scan images. RESULTS: A total of 516 patients (580 breasts) with NSM (143 breasts with c-NSM and 437 breasts with m-NSM) followed by IBR were reviewed. The mean ± SD flap thickness was 8.48 ± 1.81 mm in patients who underwent m-NSM, while it was 6.32 ± 1.15 mm in the c-NSM cohort (p = 0.02). The overall major complications rate was lower in the m-NSM group (3.0% vs. 9.0%, p < 0.013). Ischemic complications of the mastectomy flap and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) were more in c-NSM, although the difference was not statistically significant. The mean panel assessment scores were higher in the m-NSM group (3.14 (good) and 2.38 (fair) in the m-NSM and c-NSM groups, respectively; p < 0.001). Moreover, m-NSM was associated with greater improvements in psychosocial (p < 0.001) and sexual (p = 0.007) well-being. CONCLUSION: Preserving the anterior lamellar fat in NSM was associated with thicker mastectomy flap, overall lower rates of complications, including ischemia of the mastectomy flap and nipple-areolar complex, and was associated with better aesthetic outcomes and improved quality of life. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9583667/ /pubmed/36277278 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1001019 Text en © 2022 Najmiddinov, Park, Yoon, Myung, Koh, Lee, Hoon, Shin, Kim and Heo. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Najmiddinov, Bakhtiyor
Park, Joseph Kyu-hyung
Yoon, Kyung-Hwak
Myung, Yujin
Koh, Hyoung Won
Lee, Ok Hee
Hoon, Jeong Jae
Shin, Hee Chul
Kim, Eun-Kyu
Heo, Chan Yeong
Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes
title Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes
title_full Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes
title_fullStr Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes
title_short Conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: Complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes
title_sort conventional versus modified nipple sparing mastectomy in immediate breast reconstruction: complications, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9583667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277278
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1001019
work_keys_str_mv AT najmiddinovbakhtiyor conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT parkjosephkyuhyung conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT yoonkyunghwak conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT myungyujin conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT kohhyoungwon conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT leeokhee conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT hoonjeongjae conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT shinheechul conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT kimeunkyu conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes
AT heochanyeong conventionalversusmodifiednipplesparingmastectomyinimmediatebreastreconstructioncomplicationsaestheticandpatientreportedoutcomes