Cargando…

Ultrasound Criteria and Baker Scale for Breast Implant Capsular Contracture Diagnosis

Due to the subjectivity of the Baker scale in grading capsular contracture (CC), an objective and reproducible measurement tool is necessary to estimate the presence and grade of CC in patients with breast implants. This study aimed to assess the capacity of breast ultrasonography to identify CCs us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torres-Zuniga, Sebastian, Ziade, Nadia V., Zambrano, Juan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004582
_version_ 1784813207039246336
author Torres-Zuniga, Sebastian
Ziade, Nadia V.
Zambrano, Juan C.
author_facet Torres-Zuniga, Sebastian
Ziade, Nadia V.
Zambrano, Juan C.
author_sort Torres-Zuniga, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description Due to the subjectivity of the Baker scale in grading capsular contracture (CC), an objective and reproducible measurement tool is necessary to estimate the presence and grade of CC in patients with breast implants. This study aimed to assess the capacity of breast ultrasonography to identify CCs using the Baker grading system. METHODS: This study included patients who underwent breast augmentation with implants or implant-based breast reconstruction. Patient demographics, surgical type, and ultrasonographic variables were analyzed. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to determine differences between means, and the Fisher exact test was used for binary variables. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients (28 breasts) with smooth surface implants were included. In total, 39.2% of breasts had a score of Baker I, 25% had Baker II, 17.9% had Baker III, and 17.9% had Baker IV. When comparing breasts graded Baker I to IV, a mean capsule thickness of 0.6 ± 0.2, 1.0 ± 0.53, 1.68 ± 0.99, and 1.52 ± 0.46 mm, respectively, was shown (P = 0.0044). The breast implant deformity variable was significantly different between Baker grades I to IV (0.0218). Finally, Baker III and IV categories were five times more likely to have abnormal wrinkles than Baker I and II (odds ratio, 5.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.82–33.45; P = 0.0496). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound is a useful tool for evaluating the presence of augmented thickness, implant shape deformity, and abnormal wrinkles of the implant shell in correlation with the severity of CC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9584181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95841812022-10-24 Ultrasound Criteria and Baker Scale for Breast Implant Capsular Contracture Diagnosis Torres-Zuniga, Sebastian Ziade, Nadia V. Zambrano, Juan C. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Breast Due to the subjectivity of the Baker scale in grading capsular contracture (CC), an objective and reproducible measurement tool is necessary to estimate the presence and grade of CC in patients with breast implants. This study aimed to assess the capacity of breast ultrasonography to identify CCs using the Baker grading system. METHODS: This study included patients who underwent breast augmentation with implants or implant-based breast reconstruction. Patient demographics, surgical type, and ultrasonographic variables were analyzed. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to determine differences between means, and the Fisher exact test was used for binary variables. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients (28 breasts) with smooth surface implants were included. In total, 39.2% of breasts had a score of Baker I, 25% had Baker II, 17.9% had Baker III, and 17.9% had Baker IV. When comparing breasts graded Baker I to IV, a mean capsule thickness of 0.6 ± 0.2, 1.0 ± 0.53, 1.68 ± 0.99, and 1.52 ± 0.46 mm, respectively, was shown (P = 0.0044). The breast implant deformity variable was significantly different between Baker grades I to IV (0.0218). Finally, Baker III and IV categories were five times more likely to have abnormal wrinkles than Baker I and II (odds ratio, 5.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.82–33.45; P = 0.0496). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound is a useful tool for evaluating the presence of augmented thickness, implant shape deformity, and abnormal wrinkles of the implant shell in correlation with the severity of CC. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9584181/ /pubmed/36284718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004582 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Breast
Torres-Zuniga, Sebastian
Ziade, Nadia V.
Zambrano, Juan C.
Ultrasound Criteria and Baker Scale for Breast Implant Capsular Contracture Diagnosis
title Ultrasound Criteria and Baker Scale for Breast Implant Capsular Contracture Diagnosis
title_full Ultrasound Criteria and Baker Scale for Breast Implant Capsular Contracture Diagnosis
title_fullStr Ultrasound Criteria and Baker Scale for Breast Implant Capsular Contracture Diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound Criteria and Baker Scale for Breast Implant Capsular Contracture Diagnosis
title_short Ultrasound Criteria and Baker Scale for Breast Implant Capsular Contracture Diagnosis
title_sort ultrasound criteria and baker scale for breast implant capsular contracture diagnosis
topic Breast
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004582
work_keys_str_mv AT torreszunigasebastian ultrasoundcriteriaandbakerscaleforbreastimplantcapsularcontracturediagnosis
AT ziadenadiav ultrasoundcriteriaandbakerscaleforbreastimplantcapsularcontracturediagnosis
AT zambranojuanc ultrasoundcriteriaandbakerscaleforbreastimplantcapsularcontracturediagnosis