Cargando…

Usage of a Value-based Triaging Methodology for Assessing Improvements in Value for Hip Fracture Inpatient Episodes of Care From 2014 to 2019: A Pilot Study

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate a novel technology used to measure improvements in quality and value of care for treatment of hip fracture patients. METHODS: A novel value-based triaging methodology uses a risk prediction (risk M) and inpatient cost prediction (risk C) algorithm and has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konda, Sanjit R., Ranson, Rachel, Denasty, Adwin, Egol, Kenneth A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36734647
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00096
Descripción
Sumario:The purpose of this study was to demonstrate a novel technology used to measure improvements in quality and value of care for treatment of hip fracture patients. METHODS: A novel value-based triaging methodology uses a risk prediction (risk M) and inpatient cost prediction (risk C) algorithm and has been demonstrated to accurately predict high-risk:high-cost episodes of care. Two hundred twenty-nine hip fracture patients from 2014 to 2016 were used to establish baseline length of stay (LOS) and total inpatient cost for each (16) risk:cost quadrants. Two hundred sixty-five patients between 2017 and 2019 with hip fractures were input into the algorithm, and historical LOS and cost for each patient were calculated. Historical values were compared with actual values to determine whether the value of the inpatient episode of care differed from the 2014 to 16 cohort. RESULTS: When evaluated without risk or cost stratification, the mean actual LOS and cost of the baseline cohort compared with the 2017 to 2019 cohort were 8.0 vs 7.5 days (P = 0.43) and $25,446 vs $29,849 (P = 0.15), respectively. This analysis demonstrates that there was only a small change in value of care provided to patients based on LOS/cost over the studied period; however, risk:cost analysis using the novel methodology demonstrated that for select risk:cost quadrants, value of care measured by LOS/cost improved, whereas for others it decreased and for others there was no change. CONCLUSION: Risk-cost–adjusted analysis of inpatient episodes of care rendered by a value-based triaging methodology provides a robust method of assessing improvements and/or decreases in value-based care when compared with a historical cohort. This methodology provides the tools to both track hospital interventions designed to improve quality and decrease cost as well as determine whether these interventions are effective in improving value.