Cargando…

2020 COVID-19-Related Lockdown: the Relationships Between Coping Strategies, Psychological Adjustment and Resilience Among a Non-clinical Sample of British Adults

To curb COVID-19 infections, the British government enforced a series of lockdowns resulting in restrictions on movement and socialisation. This study assessed which groups may have been at higher risk of emotional distress among a non-clinical sample of British adults. It also examined which coping...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lafarge, Caroline, Milani, Raffaella, Cahill, Sharon, Görzig, Anke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42844-022-00079-5
_version_ 1784813219843407872
author Lafarge, Caroline
Milani, Raffaella
Cahill, Sharon
Görzig, Anke
author_facet Lafarge, Caroline
Milani, Raffaella
Cahill, Sharon
Görzig, Anke
author_sort Lafarge, Caroline
collection PubMed
description To curb COVID-19 infections, the British government enforced a series of lockdowns resulting in restrictions on movement and socialisation. This study assessed which groups may have been at higher risk of emotional distress among a non-clinical sample of British adults. It also examined which coping strategies, if any, related to more positive psychological adjustment and higher resilience scores. A cross-sectional, correlational study was carried out. Using a convenience sample, an online survey was conducted in April–June 2020. One hundred ninety-four participants completed the Brief COPE (coping), the GAD-7 (anxiety), the PHQ-9 (depression), the CD-RISC (resilience), and provided demographic information. Participants used mainly coping strategies considered to be adaptive. They exhibited mild/moderate anxiety and depression symptoms, and moderate resilience scores. However, some individuals displayed significantly higher distress symptoms and lower resilience scores than others, especially those aged under 35 (particularly 18–24), those not working, those who were single and/or childless. Results also show that coping strategies including substance use, behavioural disengagement and self-blame were associated with anxiety and/or depression symptoms, conversely, positive reframing related to lower anxiety symptomatology. Interventions promoting positive reframing may be helpful. Similarly, interventions promoting connection to others, a factor known to enhance resilience, may be beneficial. This is particularly relevant to groups who may be more at risk of psychological distress, such as young individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9584239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95842392022-10-21 2020 COVID-19-Related Lockdown: the Relationships Between Coping Strategies, Psychological Adjustment and Resilience Among a Non-clinical Sample of British Adults Lafarge, Caroline Milani, Raffaella Cahill, Sharon Görzig, Anke Advers Resil Sci Original Article To curb COVID-19 infections, the British government enforced a series of lockdowns resulting in restrictions on movement and socialisation. This study assessed which groups may have been at higher risk of emotional distress among a non-clinical sample of British adults. It also examined which coping strategies, if any, related to more positive psychological adjustment and higher resilience scores. A cross-sectional, correlational study was carried out. Using a convenience sample, an online survey was conducted in April–June 2020. One hundred ninety-four participants completed the Brief COPE (coping), the GAD-7 (anxiety), the PHQ-9 (depression), the CD-RISC (resilience), and provided demographic information. Participants used mainly coping strategies considered to be adaptive. They exhibited mild/moderate anxiety and depression symptoms, and moderate resilience scores. However, some individuals displayed significantly higher distress symptoms and lower resilience scores than others, especially those aged under 35 (particularly 18–24), those not working, those who were single and/or childless. Results also show that coping strategies including substance use, behavioural disengagement and self-blame were associated with anxiety and/or depression symptoms, conversely, positive reframing related to lower anxiety symptomatology. Interventions promoting positive reframing may be helpful. Similarly, interventions promoting connection to others, a factor known to enhance resilience, may be beneficial. This is particularly relevant to groups who may be more at risk of psychological distress, such as young individuals. Springer International Publishing 2022-10-20 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9584239/ /pubmed/36284516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42844-022-00079-5 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lafarge, Caroline
Milani, Raffaella
Cahill, Sharon
Görzig, Anke
2020 COVID-19-Related Lockdown: the Relationships Between Coping Strategies, Psychological Adjustment and Resilience Among a Non-clinical Sample of British Adults
title 2020 COVID-19-Related Lockdown: the Relationships Between Coping Strategies, Psychological Adjustment and Resilience Among a Non-clinical Sample of British Adults
title_full 2020 COVID-19-Related Lockdown: the Relationships Between Coping Strategies, Psychological Adjustment and Resilience Among a Non-clinical Sample of British Adults
title_fullStr 2020 COVID-19-Related Lockdown: the Relationships Between Coping Strategies, Psychological Adjustment and Resilience Among a Non-clinical Sample of British Adults
title_full_unstemmed 2020 COVID-19-Related Lockdown: the Relationships Between Coping Strategies, Psychological Adjustment and Resilience Among a Non-clinical Sample of British Adults
title_short 2020 COVID-19-Related Lockdown: the Relationships Between Coping Strategies, Psychological Adjustment and Resilience Among a Non-clinical Sample of British Adults
title_sort 2020 covid-19-related lockdown: the relationships between coping strategies, psychological adjustment and resilience among a non-clinical sample of british adults
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42844-022-00079-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lafargecaroline 2020covid19relatedlockdowntherelationshipsbetweencopingstrategiespsychologicaladjustmentandresilienceamonganonclinicalsampleofbritishadults
AT milaniraffaella 2020covid19relatedlockdowntherelationshipsbetweencopingstrategiespsychologicaladjustmentandresilienceamonganonclinicalsampleofbritishadults
AT cahillsharon 2020covid19relatedlockdowntherelationshipsbetweencopingstrategiespsychologicaladjustmentandresilienceamonganonclinicalsampleofbritishadults
AT gorziganke 2020covid19relatedlockdowntherelationshipsbetweencopingstrategiespsychologicaladjustmentandresilienceamonganonclinicalsampleofbritishadults