Cargando…

Challenges and costs of donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantations

BACKGROUND: The increasing interest to perform and investigate the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has generated an urge for feasible donor screening. We report our experience with stool donor recruitment, screening, follow-up, and associated costs in the context of clinical FMT t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bénard, Mèlanie V., de Bruijn, Clara M. A., Fenneman, Aline C., Wortelboer, Koen, Zeevenhoven, Judith, Rethans, Bente, Herrema, Hilde J., van Gool, Tom, Nieuwdorp, Max, Benninga, Marc A., Ponsioen, Cyriel Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36264933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276323
_version_ 1784813258730897408
author Bénard, Mèlanie V.
de Bruijn, Clara M. A.
Fenneman, Aline C.
Wortelboer, Koen
Zeevenhoven, Judith
Rethans, Bente
Herrema, Hilde J.
van Gool, Tom
Nieuwdorp, Max
Benninga, Marc A.
Ponsioen, Cyriel Y.
author_facet Bénard, Mèlanie V.
de Bruijn, Clara M. A.
Fenneman, Aline C.
Wortelboer, Koen
Zeevenhoven, Judith
Rethans, Bente
Herrema, Hilde J.
van Gool, Tom
Nieuwdorp, Max
Benninga, Marc A.
Ponsioen, Cyriel Y.
author_sort Bénard, Mèlanie V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The increasing interest to perform and investigate the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has generated an urge for feasible donor screening. We report our experience with stool donor recruitment, screening, follow-up, and associated costs in the context of clinical FMT trials. METHODS: Potential stool donors, aged between 18−65 years, underwent a stepwise screening process starting with an extensive questionnaire followed by feces and blood investigations. When eligible, donors were rescreened for MDROs and SARS-CoV-2 every 60-days, and full rescreening every 4−6 months. The costs to find and retain a stool donor were calculated. RESULTS: From January 2018 to August 2021, 393 potential donors underwent prescreening, of which 202 (51.4%) did not proceed primarily due to loss to follow-up, medication use, or logistic reasons (e.g. COVID-19 measures). 191 potential donors filled in the questionnaire, of which 43 (22.5%) were excluded. The remaining 148 candidates underwent parasitology screening: 91 (61.5%) were excluded, mostly due to Dientamoeba fragilis and/or high amounts of Blastocystis spp. After additional feces investigations 18/57 (31.6%) potential donors were excluded (mainly for presence of Helicobacter Pylori and ESBL-producing organisms). One donor failed serum testing. Overall, 38 out of 393 (10%) potential donors were enrolled. The median participation time of active stool donors was 13 months. To recruit 38 stool donors, €64.112 was spent. CONCLUSION: Recruitment of stool donors for FMT is challenging. In our Dutch cohort, failed eligibility of potential donors was often caused by the presence of the protozoa Dientamoeba fragilis and Blastocystis spp.. The exclusion of potential donors that carry these protozoa, especially Blastocystis spp., is questionable and deserves reconsideration. High-quality donor screening is associated with substantial costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9584411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95844112022-10-21 Challenges and costs of donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantations Bénard, Mèlanie V. de Bruijn, Clara M. A. Fenneman, Aline C. Wortelboer, Koen Zeevenhoven, Judith Rethans, Bente Herrema, Hilde J. van Gool, Tom Nieuwdorp, Max Benninga, Marc A. Ponsioen, Cyriel Y. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The increasing interest to perform and investigate the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has generated an urge for feasible donor screening. We report our experience with stool donor recruitment, screening, follow-up, and associated costs in the context of clinical FMT trials. METHODS: Potential stool donors, aged between 18−65 years, underwent a stepwise screening process starting with an extensive questionnaire followed by feces and blood investigations. When eligible, donors were rescreened for MDROs and SARS-CoV-2 every 60-days, and full rescreening every 4−6 months. The costs to find and retain a stool donor were calculated. RESULTS: From January 2018 to August 2021, 393 potential donors underwent prescreening, of which 202 (51.4%) did not proceed primarily due to loss to follow-up, medication use, or logistic reasons (e.g. COVID-19 measures). 191 potential donors filled in the questionnaire, of which 43 (22.5%) were excluded. The remaining 148 candidates underwent parasitology screening: 91 (61.5%) were excluded, mostly due to Dientamoeba fragilis and/or high amounts of Blastocystis spp. After additional feces investigations 18/57 (31.6%) potential donors were excluded (mainly for presence of Helicobacter Pylori and ESBL-producing organisms). One donor failed serum testing. Overall, 38 out of 393 (10%) potential donors were enrolled. The median participation time of active stool donors was 13 months. To recruit 38 stool donors, €64.112 was spent. CONCLUSION: Recruitment of stool donors for FMT is challenging. In our Dutch cohort, failed eligibility of potential donors was often caused by the presence of the protozoa Dientamoeba fragilis and Blastocystis spp.. The exclusion of potential donors that carry these protozoa, especially Blastocystis spp., is questionable and deserves reconsideration. High-quality donor screening is associated with substantial costs. Public Library of Science 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9584411/ /pubmed/36264933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276323 Text en © 2022 Bénard et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bénard, Mèlanie V.
de Bruijn, Clara M. A.
Fenneman, Aline C.
Wortelboer, Koen
Zeevenhoven, Judith
Rethans, Bente
Herrema, Hilde J.
van Gool, Tom
Nieuwdorp, Max
Benninga, Marc A.
Ponsioen, Cyriel Y.
Challenges and costs of donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantations
title Challenges and costs of donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantations
title_full Challenges and costs of donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantations
title_fullStr Challenges and costs of donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantations
title_full_unstemmed Challenges and costs of donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantations
title_short Challenges and costs of donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantations
title_sort challenges and costs of donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36264933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276323
work_keys_str_mv AT benardmelaniev challengesandcostsofdonorscreeningforfecalmicrobiotatransplantations
AT debruijnclarama challengesandcostsofdonorscreeningforfecalmicrobiotatransplantations
AT fennemanalinec challengesandcostsofdonorscreeningforfecalmicrobiotatransplantations
AT wortelboerkoen challengesandcostsofdonorscreeningforfecalmicrobiotatransplantations
AT zeevenhovenjudith challengesandcostsofdonorscreeningforfecalmicrobiotatransplantations
AT rethansbente challengesandcostsofdonorscreeningforfecalmicrobiotatransplantations
AT herremahildej challengesandcostsofdonorscreeningforfecalmicrobiotatransplantations
AT vangooltom challengesandcostsofdonorscreeningforfecalmicrobiotatransplantations
AT nieuwdorpmax challengesandcostsofdonorscreeningforfecalmicrobiotatransplantations
AT benningamarca challengesandcostsofdonorscreeningforfecalmicrobiotatransplantations
AT ponsioencyriely challengesandcostsofdonorscreeningforfecalmicrobiotatransplantations