Cargando…
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: At present, it is difficult and risky to diagnose splenic lesions by conventional needle biopsy using computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition is increasingly being used as a new technique to determine the tissue diagnosi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36264978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276529 |
_version_ | 1784813290100097024 |
---|---|
author | Pan, Xiao Huang, Shu Gan, Peiling Shi, Lei Xia, Huifang Zeng, Xinyi Zhang, Han Lü, Muhan Zhou, Xian Tang, Xiaowei |
author_facet | Pan, Xiao Huang, Shu Gan, Peiling Shi, Lei Xia, Huifang Zeng, Xinyi Zhang, Han Lü, Muhan Zhou, Xian Tang, Xiaowei |
author_sort | Pan, Xiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: At present, it is difficult and risky to diagnose splenic lesions by conventional needle biopsy using computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition is increasingly being used as a new technique to determine the tissue diagnosis of splenic lesions. Therefore, our goal was to determine the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for the diagnosis of splenic lesions using Metadisc. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Questionnaire, a quality assessment tool, was used to scrutinize the quality of the studies. RESULTS: Six eligible studies between January 2000 and June 2022 were identified, and a total number of 62 patients (aged range from 19 to 84) were enrolled. One patient was excluded because of insufficient specimens. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of included studies were 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73–0.93] and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.46–0.95), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 2.38 (95% CI, 1.24–4.57), the pooled negative LR was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.17–0.55), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 8.67 (95% CI, 2.80–26.82), the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.8100 (Standard Error 0.0813). CONCLUSION: EUS-guided tissue acquisition is a safe technique with high sensitivity in the diagnosis of splenic lesions. However, because of the small sample sizes, more studies with more cases are needed to further validate these results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9584539 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95845392022-10-21 Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy Pan, Xiao Huang, Shu Gan, Peiling Shi, Lei Xia, Huifang Zeng, Xinyi Zhang, Han Lü, Muhan Zhou, Xian Tang, Xiaowei PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: At present, it is difficult and risky to diagnose splenic lesions by conventional needle biopsy using computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition is increasingly being used as a new technique to determine the tissue diagnosis of splenic lesions. Therefore, our goal was to determine the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for the diagnosis of splenic lesions using Metadisc. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Questionnaire, a quality assessment tool, was used to scrutinize the quality of the studies. RESULTS: Six eligible studies between January 2000 and June 2022 were identified, and a total number of 62 patients (aged range from 19 to 84) were enrolled. One patient was excluded because of insufficient specimens. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of included studies were 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73–0.93] and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.46–0.95), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 2.38 (95% CI, 1.24–4.57), the pooled negative LR was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.17–0.55), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 8.67 (95% CI, 2.80–26.82), the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.8100 (Standard Error 0.0813). CONCLUSION: EUS-guided tissue acquisition is a safe technique with high sensitivity in the diagnosis of splenic lesions. However, because of the small sample sizes, more studies with more cases are needed to further validate these results. Public Library of Science 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9584539/ /pubmed/36264978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276529 Text en © 2022 Pan et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pan, Xiao Huang, Shu Gan, Peiling Shi, Lei Xia, Huifang Zeng, Xinyi Zhang, Han Lü, Muhan Zhou, Xian Tang, Xiaowei Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy |
title | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy |
title_full | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy |
title_short | Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy |
title_sort | endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584539/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36264978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276529 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panxiao endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy AT huangshu endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy AT ganpeiling endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy AT shilei endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy AT xiahuifang endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy AT zengxinyi endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy AT zhanghan endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy AT lumuhan endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy AT zhouxian endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy AT tangxiaowei endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy |