Cargando…

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: At present, it is difficult and risky to diagnose splenic lesions by conventional needle biopsy using computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition is increasingly being used as a new technique to determine the tissue diagnosi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Xiao, Huang, Shu, Gan, Peiling, Shi, Lei, Xia, Huifang, Zeng, Xinyi, Zhang, Han, Lü, Muhan, Zhou, Xian, Tang, Xiaowei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36264978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276529
_version_ 1784813290100097024
author Pan, Xiao
Huang, Shu
Gan, Peiling
Shi, Lei
Xia, Huifang
Zeng, Xinyi
Zhang, Han
Lü, Muhan
Zhou, Xian
Tang, Xiaowei
author_facet Pan, Xiao
Huang, Shu
Gan, Peiling
Shi, Lei
Xia, Huifang
Zeng, Xinyi
Zhang, Han
Lü, Muhan
Zhou, Xian
Tang, Xiaowei
author_sort Pan, Xiao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: At present, it is difficult and risky to diagnose splenic lesions by conventional needle biopsy using computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition is increasingly being used as a new technique to determine the tissue diagnosis of splenic lesions. Therefore, our goal was to determine the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for the diagnosis of splenic lesions using Metadisc. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Questionnaire, a quality assessment tool, was used to scrutinize the quality of the studies. RESULTS: Six eligible studies between January 2000 and June 2022 were identified, and a total number of 62 patients (aged range from 19 to 84) were enrolled. One patient was excluded because of insufficient specimens. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of included studies were 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73–0.93] and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.46–0.95), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 2.38 (95% CI, 1.24–4.57), the pooled negative LR was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.17–0.55), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 8.67 (95% CI, 2.80–26.82), the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.8100 (Standard Error 0.0813). CONCLUSION: EUS-guided tissue acquisition is a safe technique with high sensitivity in the diagnosis of splenic lesions. However, because of the small sample sizes, more studies with more cases are needed to further validate these results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9584539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95845392022-10-21 Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy Pan, Xiao Huang, Shu Gan, Peiling Shi, Lei Xia, Huifang Zeng, Xinyi Zhang, Han Lü, Muhan Zhou, Xian Tang, Xiaowei PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: At present, it is difficult and risky to diagnose splenic lesions by conventional needle biopsy using computed tomography (CT) or ultrasound (US). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition is increasingly being used as a new technique to determine the tissue diagnosis of splenic lesions. Therefore, our goal was to determine the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled sensitivity and specificity of EUS-guided tissue acquisition for the diagnosis of splenic lesions using Metadisc. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies Questionnaire, a quality assessment tool, was used to scrutinize the quality of the studies. RESULTS: Six eligible studies between January 2000 and June 2022 were identified, and a total number of 62 patients (aged range from 19 to 84) were enrolled. One patient was excluded because of insufficient specimens. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of included studies were 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73–0.93] and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.46–0.95), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 2.38 (95% CI, 1.24–4.57), the pooled negative LR was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.17–0.55), the pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 8.67 (95% CI, 2.80–26.82), the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.8100 (Standard Error 0.0813). CONCLUSION: EUS-guided tissue acquisition is a safe technique with high sensitivity in the diagnosis of splenic lesions. However, because of the small sample sizes, more studies with more cases are needed to further validate these results. Public Library of Science 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9584539/ /pubmed/36264978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276529 Text en © 2022 Pan et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pan, Xiao
Huang, Shu
Gan, Peiling
Shi, Lei
Xia, Huifang
Zeng, Xinyi
Zhang, Han
Lü, Muhan
Zhou, Xian
Tang, Xiaowei
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title_full Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title_fullStr Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title_short Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
title_sort endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for splenic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36264978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276529
work_keys_str_mv AT panxiao endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT huangshu endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT ganpeiling endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT shilei endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT xiahuifang endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT zengxinyi endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT zhanghan endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT lumuhan endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT zhouxian endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy
AT tangxiaowei endoscopicultrasoundguidedtissueacquisitionforspleniclesionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdiagnostictestaccuracy