Cargando…
Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS
Knowledge of element concentrations in botanical extracts is relevant to assure consumer protection given the increased interest in plant-based ingredients. This study demonstrates successful multi-element investigations in order to address the lack of comprehensive profiling data for botanical extr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36266322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16873-1 |
_version_ | 1784813377899462656 |
---|---|
author | Kenny, Ciara-Ruth Ring, Gavin Sheehan, Aisling Mc Auliffe, Michael A. P. Lucey, Brigid Furey, Ambrose |
author_facet | Kenny, Ciara-Ruth Ring, Gavin Sheehan, Aisling Mc Auliffe, Michael A. P. Lucey, Brigid Furey, Ambrose |
author_sort | Kenny, Ciara-Ruth |
collection | PubMed |
description | Knowledge of element concentrations in botanical extracts is relevant to assure consumer protection given the increased interest in plant-based ingredients. This study demonstrates successful multi-element investigations in order to address the lack of comprehensive profiling data for botanical extracts, while reporting for the first time the metallomic profile(s) of arnica, bush vetch, sweet cicely, yellow rattle, bogbean, rock-tea and tufted catchfly. Key element compositions were quantified using a validated HR-ICP-SFMS method (µg kg(−1)) and were found highly variable between the different plants: Lithium (18–3964); Beryllium (3–121); Molybdenum (75–4505); Cadmium (5–325); Tin (6–165); Barium (747–4646); Platinum (2–33); Mercury (5–30); Thallium (3–91); Lead (12–4248); Bismuth (2–30); Titanium (131–5827); Vanadium (15–1758); Chromium (100–4534); Cobalt (21–652); Nickel (230–6060) and Copper (1910–6340). Compendial permissible limits were not exceeded. Overall, no evidence of a health risk to consumers could be determined from consumption of the investigated plants at reasonable intake rates. Mathematical risk modelling (EDI, CDI, HQ, HI) estimated levels above safe oral thresholds only for Cd (16%) and Pb (8%) from higher intakes of the respective plant-derived material. Following high consumption of certain plants, 42% of the samples were categorised as potentially unsafe due to cumulative exposure to Cu, Cd, Hg and Pb. PCA suggested a potential influence of post-harvest processing on Cr, Ti and V levels in commercially-acquired plant material compared to wild-collected and farm-grown plants. Moreover, a strong correlation was observed between Pb-Bi, Be-V, Bi-Sn, and Tl-Mo occurrence. This study may support future research by providing both robust methodology and accompanying reference profile(s) suitable for the quality evaluation of essential elements and/or metal contaminants in botanical ingredients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9584900 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95849002022-10-22 Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS Kenny, Ciara-Ruth Ring, Gavin Sheehan, Aisling Mc Auliffe, Michael A. P. Lucey, Brigid Furey, Ambrose Sci Rep Article Knowledge of element concentrations in botanical extracts is relevant to assure consumer protection given the increased interest in plant-based ingredients. This study demonstrates successful multi-element investigations in order to address the lack of comprehensive profiling data for botanical extracts, while reporting for the first time the metallomic profile(s) of arnica, bush vetch, sweet cicely, yellow rattle, bogbean, rock-tea and tufted catchfly. Key element compositions were quantified using a validated HR-ICP-SFMS method (µg kg(−1)) and were found highly variable between the different plants: Lithium (18–3964); Beryllium (3–121); Molybdenum (75–4505); Cadmium (5–325); Tin (6–165); Barium (747–4646); Platinum (2–33); Mercury (5–30); Thallium (3–91); Lead (12–4248); Bismuth (2–30); Titanium (131–5827); Vanadium (15–1758); Chromium (100–4534); Cobalt (21–652); Nickel (230–6060) and Copper (1910–6340). Compendial permissible limits were not exceeded. Overall, no evidence of a health risk to consumers could be determined from consumption of the investigated plants at reasonable intake rates. Mathematical risk modelling (EDI, CDI, HQ, HI) estimated levels above safe oral thresholds only for Cd (16%) and Pb (8%) from higher intakes of the respective plant-derived material. Following high consumption of certain plants, 42% of the samples were categorised as potentially unsafe due to cumulative exposure to Cu, Cd, Hg and Pb. PCA suggested a potential influence of post-harvest processing on Cr, Ti and V levels in commercially-acquired plant material compared to wild-collected and farm-grown plants. Moreover, a strong correlation was observed between Pb-Bi, Be-V, Bi-Sn, and Tl-Mo occurrence. This study may support future research by providing both robust methodology and accompanying reference profile(s) suitable for the quality evaluation of essential elements and/or metal contaminants in botanical ingredients. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9584900/ /pubmed/36266322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16873-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kenny, Ciara-Ruth Ring, Gavin Sheehan, Aisling Mc Auliffe, Michael A. P. Lucey, Brigid Furey, Ambrose Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS |
title | Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS |
title_full | Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS |
title_fullStr | Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS |
title_full_unstemmed | Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS |
title_short | Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS |
title_sort | novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using hr-icp-sfms |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584900/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36266322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16873-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kennyciararuth novelmetallomicprofilingandnoncarcinogenicriskassessmentofbotanicalingredientsforuseinherbalphytopharmaceuticalanddietaryproductsusinghricpsfms AT ringgavin novelmetallomicprofilingandnoncarcinogenicriskassessmentofbotanicalingredientsforuseinherbalphytopharmaceuticalanddietaryproductsusinghricpsfms AT sheehanaisling novelmetallomicprofilingandnoncarcinogenicriskassessmentofbotanicalingredientsforuseinherbalphytopharmaceuticalanddietaryproductsusinghricpsfms AT mcauliffemichaelap novelmetallomicprofilingandnoncarcinogenicriskassessmentofbotanicalingredientsforuseinherbalphytopharmaceuticalanddietaryproductsusinghricpsfms AT luceybrigid novelmetallomicprofilingandnoncarcinogenicriskassessmentofbotanicalingredientsforuseinherbalphytopharmaceuticalanddietaryproductsusinghricpsfms AT fureyambrose novelmetallomicprofilingandnoncarcinogenicriskassessmentofbotanicalingredientsforuseinherbalphytopharmaceuticalanddietaryproductsusinghricpsfms |