Cargando…

Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS

Knowledge of element concentrations in botanical extracts is relevant to assure consumer protection given the increased interest in plant-based ingredients. This study demonstrates successful multi-element investigations in order to address the lack of comprehensive profiling data for botanical extr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kenny, Ciara-Ruth, Ring, Gavin, Sheehan, Aisling, Mc Auliffe, Michael A. P., Lucey, Brigid, Furey, Ambrose
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36266322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16873-1
_version_ 1784813377899462656
author Kenny, Ciara-Ruth
Ring, Gavin
Sheehan, Aisling
Mc Auliffe, Michael A. P.
Lucey, Brigid
Furey, Ambrose
author_facet Kenny, Ciara-Ruth
Ring, Gavin
Sheehan, Aisling
Mc Auliffe, Michael A. P.
Lucey, Brigid
Furey, Ambrose
author_sort Kenny, Ciara-Ruth
collection PubMed
description Knowledge of element concentrations in botanical extracts is relevant to assure consumer protection given the increased interest in plant-based ingredients. This study demonstrates successful multi-element investigations in order to address the lack of comprehensive profiling data for botanical extracts, while reporting for the first time the metallomic profile(s) of arnica, bush vetch, sweet cicely, yellow rattle, bogbean, rock-tea and tufted catchfly. Key element compositions were quantified using a validated HR-ICP-SFMS method (µg kg(−1)) and were found highly variable between the different plants: Lithium (18–3964); Beryllium (3–121); Molybdenum (75–4505); Cadmium (5–325); Tin (6–165); Barium (747–4646); Platinum (2–33); Mercury (5–30); Thallium (3–91); Lead (12–4248); Bismuth (2–30); Titanium (131–5827); Vanadium (15–1758); Chromium (100–4534); Cobalt (21–652); Nickel (230–6060) and Copper (1910–6340). Compendial permissible limits were not exceeded. Overall, no evidence of a health risk to consumers could be determined from consumption of the investigated plants at reasonable intake rates. Mathematical risk modelling (EDI, CDI, HQ, HI) estimated levels above safe oral thresholds only for Cd (16%) and Pb (8%) from higher intakes of the respective plant-derived material. Following high consumption of certain plants, 42% of the samples were categorised as potentially unsafe due to cumulative exposure to Cu, Cd, Hg and Pb. PCA suggested a potential influence of post-harvest processing on Cr, Ti and V levels in commercially-acquired plant material compared to wild-collected and farm-grown plants. Moreover, a strong correlation was observed between Pb-Bi, Be-V, Bi-Sn, and Tl-Mo occurrence. This study may support future research by providing both robust methodology and accompanying reference profile(s) suitable for the quality evaluation of essential elements and/or metal contaminants in botanical ingredients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9584900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95849002022-10-22 Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS Kenny, Ciara-Ruth Ring, Gavin Sheehan, Aisling Mc Auliffe, Michael A. P. Lucey, Brigid Furey, Ambrose Sci Rep Article Knowledge of element concentrations in botanical extracts is relevant to assure consumer protection given the increased interest in plant-based ingredients. This study demonstrates successful multi-element investigations in order to address the lack of comprehensive profiling data for botanical extracts, while reporting for the first time the metallomic profile(s) of arnica, bush vetch, sweet cicely, yellow rattle, bogbean, rock-tea and tufted catchfly. Key element compositions were quantified using a validated HR-ICP-SFMS method (µg kg(−1)) and were found highly variable between the different plants: Lithium (18–3964); Beryllium (3–121); Molybdenum (75–4505); Cadmium (5–325); Tin (6–165); Barium (747–4646); Platinum (2–33); Mercury (5–30); Thallium (3–91); Lead (12–4248); Bismuth (2–30); Titanium (131–5827); Vanadium (15–1758); Chromium (100–4534); Cobalt (21–652); Nickel (230–6060) and Copper (1910–6340). Compendial permissible limits were not exceeded. Overall, no evidence of a health risk to consumers could be determined from consumption of the investigated plants at reasonable intake rates. Mathematical risk modelling (EDI, CDI, HQ, HI) estimated levels above safe oral thresholds only for Cd (16%) and Pb (8%) from higher intakes of the respective plant-derived material. Following high consumption of certain plants, 42% of the samples were categorised as potentially unsafe due to cumulative exposure to Cu, Cd, Hg and Pb. PCA suggested a potential influence of post-harvest processing on Cr, Ti and V levels in commercially-acquired plant material compared to wild-collected and farm-grown plants. Moreover, a strong correlation was observed between Pb-Bi, Be-V, Bi-Sn, and Tl-Mo occurrence. This study may support future research by providing both robust methodology and accompanying reference profile(s) suitable for the quality evaluation of essential elements and/or metal contaminants in botanical ingredients. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9584900/ /pubmed/36266322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16873-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kenny, Ciara-Ruth
Ring, Gavin
Sheehan, Aisling
Mc Auliffe, Michael A. P.
Lucey, Brigid
Furey, Ambrose
Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS
title Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS
title_full Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS
title_fullStr Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS
title_full_unstemmed Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS
title_short Novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using HR-ICP-SFMS
title_sort novel metallomic profiling and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of botanical ingredients for use in herbal, phytopharmaceutical and dietary products using hr-icp-sfms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9584900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36266322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16873-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kennyciararuth novelmetallomicprofilingandnoncarcinogenicriskassessmentofbotanicalingredientsforuseinherbalphytopharmaceuticalanddietaryproductsusinghricpsfms
AT ringgavin novelmetallomicprofilingandnoncarcinogenicriskassessmentofbotanicalingredientsforuseinherbalphytopharmaceuticalanddietaryproductsusinghricpsfms
AT sheehanaisling novelmetallomicprofilingandnoncarcinogenicriskassessmentofbotanicalingredientsforuseinherbalphytopharmaceuticalanddietaryproductsusinghricpsfms
AT mcauliffemichaelap novelmetallomicprofilingandnoncarcinogenicriskassessmentofbotanicalingredientsforuseinherbalphytopharmaceuticalanddietaryproductsusinghricpsfms
AT luceybrigid novelmetallomicprofilingandnoncarcinogenicriskassessmentofbotanicalingredientsforuseinherbalphytopharmaceuticalanddietaryproductsusinghricpsfms
AT fureyambrose novelmetallomicprofilingandnoncarcinogenicriskassessmentofbotanicalingredientsforuseinherbalphytopharmaceuticalanddietaryproductsusinghricpsfms