Cargando…
Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception
During reaching and grasping movements tactile processing is typically suppressed. However, during a reception or catching task, the object can still be acquired but without suppressive processes related to movement execution. Rather, tactile information may be facilitated as the object approaches i...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36266418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22133-z |
_version_ | 1784813406319017984 |
---|---|
author | Manzone, Damian M. Tremblay, Luc Chua, Romeo |
author_facet | Manzone, Damian M. Tremblay, Luc Chua, Romeo |
author_sort | Manzone, Damian M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | During reaching and grasping movements tactile processing is typically suppressed. However, during a reception or catching task, the object can still be acquired but without suppressive processes related to movement execution. Rather, tactile information may be facilitated as the object approaches in anticipation of object contact and the utilization of tactile feedback. Therefore, the current study investigated tactile processing during a reception task. Participants sat with their upper limb still as an object travelled to and contacted their fingers. At different points along the object’s trajectory and prior to contact, participants were asked to detect tactile stimuli delivered to their index finger. To understand if the expectation of object contact contributed to any modulation in tactile processing, the object stopped prematurely on 20% of trials. Compared to a pre-object movement baseline, relative perceptual thresholds were decreased throughout the object’s trajectory, and even when the object stopped prematurely. Further, there was no evidence for modulation when the stimulus was presented shortly before object contact. The former results suggest that tactile processing is facilitated as an object approaches an individual’s hand. As well, we purport that the expectation of tactile feedback drives this modulation. Finally, the latter results suggest that peripheral masking may have reduced/abolished any facilitation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9585022 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95850222022-10-22 Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception Manzone, Damian M. Tremblay, Luc Chua, Romeo Sci Rep Article During reaching and grasping movements tactile processing is typically suppressed. However, during a reception or catching task, the object can still be acquired but without suppressive processes related to movement execution. Rather, tactile information may be facilitated as the object approaches in anticipation of object contact and the utilization of tactile feedback. Therefore, the current study investigated tactile processing during a reception task. Participants sat with their upper limb still as an object travelled to and contacted their fingers. At different points along the object’s trajectory and prior to contact, participants were asked to detect tactile stimuli delivered to their index finger. To understand if the expectation of object contact contributed to any modulation in tactile processing, the object stopped prematurely on 20% of trials. Compared to a pre-object movement baseline, relative perceptual thresholds were decreased throughout the object’s trajectory, and even when the object stopped prematurely. Further, there was no evidence for modulation when the stimulus was presented shortly before object contact. The former results suggest that tactile processing is facilitated as an object approaches an individual’s hand. As well, we purport that the expectation of tactile feedback drives this modulation. Finally, the latter results suggest that peripheral masking may have reduced/abolished any facilitation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9585022/ /pubmed/36266418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22133-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Manzone, Damian M. Tremblay, Luc Chua, Romeo Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception |
title | Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception |
title_full | Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception |
title_fullStr | Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception |
title_full_unstemmed | Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception |
title_short | Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception |
title_sort | tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585022/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36266418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22133-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manzonedamianm tactilefacilitationduringactualandmereexpectationofobjectreception AT tremblayluc tactilefacilitationduringactualandmereexpectationofobjectreception AT chuaromeo tactilefacilitationduringactualandmereexpectationofobjectreception |