Cargando…

Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception

During reaching and grasping movements tactile processing is typically suppressed. However, during a reception or catching task, the object can still be acquired but without suppressive processes related to movement execution. Rather, tactile information may be facilitated as the object approaches i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manzone, Damian M., Tremblay, Luc, Chua, Romeo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36266418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22133-z
_version_ 1784813406319017984
author Manzone, Damian M.
Tremblay, Luc
Chua, Romeo
author_facet Manzone, Damian M.
Tremblay, Luc
Chua, Romeo
author_sort Manzone, Damian M.
collection PubMed
description During reaching and grasping movements tactile processing is typically suppressed. However, during a reception or catching task, the object can still be acquired but without suppressive processes related to movement execution. Rather, tactile information may be facilitated as the object approaches in anticipation of object contact and the utilization of tactile feedback. Therefore, the current study investigated tactile processing during a reception task. Participants sat with their upper limb still as an object travelled to and contacted their fingers. At different points along the object’s trajectory and prior to contact, participants were asked to detect tactile stimuli delivered to their index finger. To understand if the expectation of object contact contributed to any modulation in tactile processing, the object stopped prematurely on 20% of trials. Compared to a pre-object movement baseline, relative perceptual thresholds were decreased throughout the object’s trajectory, and even when the object stopped prematurely. Further, there was no evidence for modulation when the stimulus was presented shortly before object contact. The former results suggest that tactile processing is facilitated as an object approaches an individual’s hand. As well, we purport that the expectation of tactile feedback drives this modulation. Finally, the latter results suggest that peripheral masking may have reduced/abolished any facilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9585022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95850222022-10-22 Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception Manzone, Damian M. Tremblay, Luc Chua, Romeo Sci Rep Article During reaching and grasping movements tactile processing is typically suppressed. However, during a reception or catching task, the object can still be acquired but without suppressive processes related to movement execution. Rather, tactile information may be facilitated as the object approaches in anticipation of object contact and the utilization of tactile feedback. Therefore, the current study investigated tactile processing during a reception task. Participants sat with their upper limb still as an object travelled to and contacted their fingers. At different points along the object’s trajectory and prior to contact, participants were asked to detect tactile stimuli delivered to their index finger. To understand if the expectation of object contact contributed to any modulation in tactile processing, the object stopped prematurely on 20% of trials. Compared to a pre-object movement baseline, relative perceptual thresholds were decreased throughout the object’s trajectory, and even when the object stopped prematurely. Further, there was no evidence for modulation when the stimulus was presented shortly before object contact. The former results suggest that tactile processing is facilitated as an object approaches an individual’s hand. As well, we purport that the expectation of tactile feedback drives this modulation. Finally, the latter results suggest that peripheral masking may have reduced/abolished any facilitation. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9585022/ /pubmed/36266418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22133-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Manzone, Damian M.
Tremblay, Luc
Chua, Romeo
Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception
title Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception
title_full Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception
title_fullStr Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception
title_full_unstemmed Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception
title_short Tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception
title_sort tactile facilitation during actual and mere expectation of object reception
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36266418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22133-z
work_keys_str_mv AT manzonedamianm tactilefacilitationduringactualandmereexpectationofobjectreception
AT tremblayluc tactilefacilitationduringactualandmereexpectationofobjectreception
AT chuaromeo tactilefacilitationduringactualandmereexpectationofobjectreception