Cargando…
A scheme to evaluate structural alerts to predict toxicity – Assessing confidence by characterising uncertainties
Structure-activity relationships (SARs) in toxicology have enabled the formation of structural rules which, when coded as structural alerts, are essential tools in in silico toxicology. Whilst other in silico methods have approaches for their evaluation, there is no formal process to assess the conf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36041585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105249 |
_version_ | 1784813425334943744 |
---|---|
author | Cronin, Mark T.D. Bauer, Franklin J. Bonnell, Mark Campos, Bruno Ebbrell, David J. Firman, James W. Gutsell, Steve Hodges, Geoff Patlewicz, Grace Sapounidou, Maria Spînu, Nicoleta Thomas, Paul C. Worth, Andrew P. |
author_facet | Cronin, Mark T.D. Bauer, Franklin J. Bonnell, Mark Campos, Bruno Ebbrell, David J. Firman, James W. Gutsell, Steve Hodges, Geoff Patlewicz, Grace Sapounidou, Maria Spînu, Nicoleta Thomas, Paul C. Worth, Andrew P. |
author_sort | Cronin, Mark T.D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Structure-activity relationships (SARs) in toxicology have enabled the formation of structural rules which, when coded as structural alerts, are essential tools in in silico toxicology. Whilst other in silico methods have approaches for their evaluation, there is no formal process to assess the confidence that may be associated with a structural alert. This investigation proposes twelve criteria to assess the uncertainty associated with structural alerts, allowing for an assessment of confidence. The criteria are based around the stated purpose, description of the chemistry, toxicology and mechanism, performance and coverage, as well as corroborating and supporting evidence of the alert. Alerts can be given a confidence assessment and score, enabling the identification of areas where more information may be beneficial. The scheme to evaluate structural alerts was placed in the context of various use cases for industrial and regulatory applications. The analysis of alerts, and consideration of the evaluation scheme, identifies the different characteristics an alert may have, such as being highly specific or generic. These characteristics may determine when an alert can be used for specific uses such as identification of analogues for read-across or hazard identification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9585125 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95851252022-11-01 A scheme to evaluate structural alerts to predict toxicity – Assessing confidence by characterising uncertainties Cronin, Mark T.D. Bauer, Franklin J. Bonnell, Mark Campos, Bruno Ebbrell, David J. Firman, James W. Gutsell, Steve Hodges, Geoff Patlewicz, Grace Sapounidou, Maria Spînu, Nicoleta Thomas, Paul C. Worth, Andrew P. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol Article Structure-activity relationships (SARs) in toxicology have enabled the formation of structural rules which, when coded as structural alerts, are essential tools in in silico toxicology. Whilst other in silico methods have approaches for their evaluation, there is no formal process to assess the confidence that may be associated with a structural alert. This investigation proposes twelve criteria to assess the uncertainty associated with structural alerts, allowing for an assessment of confidence. The criteria are based around the stated purpose, description of the chemistry, toxicology and mechanism, performance and coverage, as well as corroborating and supporting evidence of the alert. Alerts can be given a confidence assessment and score, enabling the identification of areas where more information may be beneficial. The scheme to evaluate structural alerts was placed in the context of various use cases for industrial and regulatory applications. The analysis of alerts, and consideration of the evaluation scheme, identifies the different characteristics an alert may have, such as being highly specific or generic. These characteristics may determine when an alert can be used for specific uses such as identification of analogues for read-across or hazard identification. Elsevier 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9585125/ /pubmed/36041585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105249 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Cronin, Mark T.D. Bauer, Franklin J. Bonnell, Mark Campos, Bruno Ebbrell, David J. Firman, James W. Gutsell, Steve Hodges, Geoff Patlewicz, Grace Sapounidou, Maria Spînu, Nicoleta Thomas, Paul C. Worth, Andrew P. A scheme to evaluate structural alerts to predict toxicity – Assessing confidence by characterising uncertainties |
title | A scheme to evaluate structural alerts to predict toxicity – Assessing confidence by characterising uncertainties |
title_full | A scheme to evaluate structural alerts to predict toxicity – Assessing confidence by characterising uncertainties |
title_fullStr | A scheme to evaluate structural alerts to predict toxicity – Assessing confidence by characterising uncertainties |
title_full_unstemmed | A scheme to evaluate structural alerts to predict toxicity – Assessing confidence by characterising uncertainties |
title_short | A scheme to evaluate structural alerts to predict toxicity – Assessing confidence by characterising uncertainties |
title_sort | scheme to evaluate structural alerts to predict toxicity – assessing confidence by characterising uncertainties |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585125/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36041585 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105249 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT croninmarktd aschemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT bauerfranklinj aschemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT bonnellmark aschemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT camposbruno aschemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT ebbrelldavidj aschemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT firmanjamesw aschemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT gutsellsteve aschemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT hodgesgeoff aschemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT patlewiczgrace aschemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT sapounidoumaria aschemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT spinunicoleta aschemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT thomaspaulc aschemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT worthandrewp aschemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT croninmarktd schemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT bauerfranklinj schemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT bonnellmark schemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT camposbruno schemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT ebbrelldavidj schemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT firmanjamesw schemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT gutsellsteve schemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT hodgesgeoff schemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT patlewiczgrace schemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT sapounidoumaria schemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT spinunicoleta schemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT thomaspaulc schemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties AT worthandrewp schemetoevaluatestructuralalertstopredicttoxicityassessingconfidencebycharacterisinguncertainties |