Cargando…
Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: The use of poor quality drugs will have multiple consequences with an extended hazard of growing drug-resistant strains. PURPOSE: The review aimed to provide the quality status of antimalarial drugs in East Africa. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were sear...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277242 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S373059 |
_version_ | 1784813453902348288 |
---|---|
author | Girma, Million Umeta, Belachew Hasen, Gemmechu Suleman, Sultan |
author_facet | Girma, Million Umeta, Belachew Hasen, Gemmechu Suleman, Sultan |
author_sort | Girma, Million |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of poor quality drugs will have multiple consequences with an extended hazard of growing drug-resistant strains. PURPOSE: The review aimed to provide the quality status of antimalarial drugs in East Africa. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched from September 5 to September 12, 2021. STUDY SELECTION: The review included articles available as original research targeted at evaluating the quality of antimalarial drugs. For inclusion, data on at least one of the following quality control parameters were required: packaging and labeling, hardness, friability, weight variation/uniformity of weight, disintegration, dissolution, and assay/percentage purity. Mendeley citation manager version 1.19.4 was used to avoid duplication and organize references, and titles and abstracts were primarily used for screening. DATA EXTRACTION: The sample collection site, drug name, and the quality control parameters tested were retrieved from the selected studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Totally, 300 antimalarial drug samples from Ethiopia, Kenya and Tanzania were included in this review. No antimalarial drug tested failed the identification and disintegration test. However, 15.93% (36/226), 5.00% (15/300), and 1.90% (3/158) of antimalarial samples failed the dissolution, assay and mass uniformity test, respectively. Moreover, amodiaquine and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine samples failed dissolution and assay tests. In addition, amodiaquine samples failed the mass uniformity test. However, artemether/lumefantrine and quinine passed all quality control parameters tested. Overall, 19.67% (59/300) of antimalarial drug samples did not meet at least one quality control parameter. And the higher faller rate was reported for sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine accounting for 52.86% (37/70). CONCLUSIONS: An unneglected amount of antimalarial drug failed to meet at least one quality control parameter. Strengthening pharmaceutical management systems, including post-marketing surveillance, and providing the resources required for medication quality assurance, are recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9585264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95852642022-10-22 Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review Girma, Million Umeta, Belachew Hasen, Gemmechu Suleman, Sultan Infect Drug Resist Review BACKGROUND: The use of poor quality drugs will have multiple consequences with an extended hazard of growing drug-resistant strains. PURPOSE: The review aimed to provide the quality status of antimalarial drugs in East Africa. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched from September 5 to September 12, 2021. STUDY SELECTION: The review included articles available as original research targeted at evaluating the quality of antimalarial drugs. For inclusion, data on at least one of the following quality control parameters were required: packaging and labeling, hardness, friability, weight variation/uniformity of weight, disintegration, dissolution, and assay/percentage purity. Mendeley citation manager version 1.19.4 was used to avoid duplication and organize references, and titles and abstracts were primarily used for screening. DATA EXTRACTION: The sample collection site, drug name, and the quality control parameters tested were retrieved from the selected studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Totally, 300 antimalarial drug samples from Ethiopia, Kenya and Tanzania were included in this review. No antimalarial drug tested failed the identification and disintegration test. However, 15.93% (36/226), 5.00% (15/300), and 1.90% (3/158) of antimalarial samples failed the dissolution, assay and mass uniformity test, respectively. Moreover, amodiaquine and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine samples failed dissolution and assay tests. In addition, amodiaquine samples failed the mass uniformity test. However, artemether/lumefantrine and quinine passed all quality control parameters tested. Overall, 19.67% (59/300) of antimalarial drug samples did not meet at least one quality control parameter. And the higher faller rate was reported for sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine accounting for 52.86% (37/70). CONCLUSIONS: An unneglected amount of antimalarial drug failed to meet at least one quality control parameter. Strengthening pharmaceutical management systems, including post-marketing surveillance, and providing the resources required for medication quality assurance, are recommended. Dove 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9585264/ /pubmed/36277242 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S373059 Text en © 2022 Girma et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Review Girma, Million Umeta, Belachew Hasen, Gemmechu Suleman, Sultan Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review |
title | Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | quality of antimalarial drugs in east africa: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277242 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S373059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT girmamillion qualityofantimalarialdrugsineastafricaasystematicreview AT umetabelachew qualityofantimalarialdrugsineastafricaasystematicreview AT hasengemmechu qualityofantimalarialdrugsineastafricaasystematicreview AT sulemansultan qualityofantimalarialdrugsineastafricaasystematicreview |