Cargando…

Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: The use of poor quality drugs will have multiple consequences with an extended hazard of growing drug-resistant strains. PURPOSE: The review aimed to provide the quality status of antimalarial drugs in East Africa. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were sear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Girma, Million, Umeta, Belachew, Hasen, Gemmechu, Suleman, Sultan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277242
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S373059
_version_ 1784813453902348288
author Girma, Million
Umeta, Belachew
Hasen, Gemmechu
Suleman, Sultan
author_facet Girma, Million
Umeta, Belachew
Hasen, Gemmechu
Suleman, Sultan
author_sort Girma, Million
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of poor quality drugs will have multiple consequences with an extended hazard of growing drug-resistant strains. PURPOSE: The review aimed to provide the quality status of antimalarial drugs in East Africa. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched from September 5 to September 12, 2021. STUDY SELECTION: The review included articles available as original research targeted at evaluating the quality of antimalarial drugs. For inclusion, data on at least one of the following quality control parameters were required: packaging and labeling, hardness, friability, weight variation/uniformity of weight, disintegration, dissolution, and assay/percentage purity. Mendeley citation manager version 1.19.4 was used to avoid duplication and organize references, and titles and abstracts were primarily used for screening. DATA EXTRACTION: The sample collection site, drug name, and the quality control parameters tested were retrieved from the selected studies. DATA SYNTHESIS:  Totally, 300 antimalarial drug samples from Ethiopia, Kenya and Tanzania were included in this review. No antimalarial drug tested failed the identification and disintegration test. However, 15.93% (36/226), 5.00% (15/300), and 1.90% (3/158) of antimalarial samples failed the dissolution, assay and mass uniformity test, respectively. Moreover, amodiaquine and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine samples failed dissolution and assay tests. In addition, amodiaquine samples failed the mass uniformity test. However, artemether/lumefantrine and quinine passed all quality control parameters tested. Overall, 19.67% (59/300) of antimalarial drug samples did not meet at least one quality control parameter. And the higher faller rate was reported for sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine accounting for 52.86% (37/70). CONCLUSIONS: An unneglected amount of antimalarial drug failed to meet at least one quality control parameter. Strengthening pharmaceutical management systems, including post-marketing surveillance, and providing the resources required for medication quality assurance, are recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9585264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95852642022-10-22 Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review Girma, Million Umeta, Belachew Hasen, Gemmechu Suleman, Sultan Infect Drug Resist Review BACKGROUND: The use of poor quality drugs will have multiple consequences with an extended hazard of growing drug-resistant strains. PURPOSE: The review aimed to provide the quality status of antimalarial drugs in East Africa. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched from September 5 to September 12, 2021. STUDY SELECTION: The review included articles available as original research targeted at evaluating the quality of antimalarial drugs. For inclusion, data on at least one of the following quality control parameters were required: packaging and labeling, hardness, friability, weight variation/uniformity of weight, disintegration, dissolution, and assay/percentage purity. Mendeley citation manager version 1.19.4 was used to avoid duplication and organize references, and titles and abstracts were primarily used for screening. DATA EXTRACTION: The sample collection site, drug name, and the quality control parameters tested were retrieved from the selected studies. DATA SYNTHESIS:  Totally, 300 antimalarial drug samples from Ethiopia, Kenya and Tanzania were included in this review. No antimalarial drug tested failed the identification and disintegration test. However, 15.93% (36/226), 5.00% (15/300), and 1.90% (3/158) of antimalarial samples failed the dissolution, assay and mass uniformity test, respectively. Moreover, amodiaquine and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine samples failed dissolution and assay tests. In addition, amodiaquine samples failed the mass uniformity test. However, artemether/lumefantrine and quinine passed all quality control parameters tested. Overall, 19.67% (59/300) of antimalarial drug samples did not meet at least one quality control parameter. And the higher faller rate was reported for sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine accounting for 52.86% (37/70). CONCLUSIONS: An unneglected amount of antimalarial drug failed to meet at least one quality control parameter. Strengthening pharmaceutical management systems, including post-marketing surveillance, and providing the resources required for medication quality assurance, are recommended. Dove 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9585264/ /pubmed/36277242 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S373059 Text en © 2022 Girma et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Girma, Million
Umeta, Belachew
Hasen, Gemmechu
Suleman, Sultan
Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review
title Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review
title_full Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review
title_short Quality of Antimalarial Drugs in East Africa: A Systematic Review
title_sort quality of antimalarial drugs in east africa: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36277242
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S373059
work_keys_str_mv AT girmamillion qualityofantimalarialdrugsineastafricaasystematicreview
AT umetabelachew qualityofantimalarialdrugsineastafricaasystematicreview
AT hasengemmechu qualityofantimalarialdrugsineastafricaasystematicreview
AT sulemansultan qualityofantimalarialdrugsineastafricaasystematicreview