Cargando…
Comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching
OBJECTIVES: Clinical studies on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) have been carried out for the resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). So far, few studies have compared the survival outcomes of nCT plus ICIs and nCT alone. This study aime...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36275724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.970534 |
_version_ | 1784813460738015232 |
---|---|
author | Jing, Shao-Wu Zhai, Chang Zhang, Wei He, Ming Liu, Qing-Yi Yao, Ji-Fang Wang, Rui Tian, Zi-Qiang Wang, Jun Liu, Jun-Feng |
author_facet | Jing, Shao-Wu Zhai, Chang Zhang, Wei He, Ming Liu, Qing-Yi Yao, Ji-Fang Wang, Rui Tian, Zi-Qiang Wang, Jun Liu, Jun-Feng |
author_sort | Jing, Shao-Wu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Clinical studies on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) have been carried out for the resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). So far, few studies have compared the survival outcomes of nCT plus ICIs and nCT alone. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ICIs combined with nCT versus nCT followed by esophagectomy for patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ESCC patients underwent nCT or nCT combined with ICIs followed by esophagectomy (from March 2013 to April 2021) was performed. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper 0.01 was conducted to balance potential bias. RESULTS: A total of 47 comparable pairs of ESCC patients receiving nCT and nCT combined with ICIs were selected for the final analysis. The tumor regression grade (TRG) 0 and pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in the nCT+ICIs group were significantly higher than those of the nCT group (21.7% vs. 4.5%, P=0.016; and 17.0% vs. 2.1%, P=0.035, respectively). The rate of nerve invasion was 4.3% in the nCT+ICIs group, significantly lower than 23.4% of the nCT group (P=0.007). The incidences of adverse events in the nCT+ICIs group were similar compared with the nCT group and there was no grade 5 toxicity in either group. The 1-, 2-year disease-free survival rates (DFS) were 95.7%, 80.7% and 76.1%, 63.8% in the two groups (P=0.001, and P=0.046, respectively). The 1-year OS was improved in the nCT+ICIs group, which was close to a statistical difference (95.7% vs. 84.8%, P=0.074). Local recurrence rate in the nCT+ICIs group was 6.4%, significantly lower than 21.3% of the nCT group (P=0.036), while there was no significant difference in the distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with nCT alone, neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus nCT for patients with locally advanced ESCC has an advantage in pathological response, and could improve DFS with a good safety and feasibility, while long term survival validation is still needed further. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9585292 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95852922022-10-22 Comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching Jing, Shao-Wu Zhai, Chang Zhang, Wei He, Ming Liu, Qing-Yi Yao, Ji-Fang Wang, Rui Tian, Zi-Qiang Wang, Jun Liu, Jun-Feng Front Immunol Immunology OBJECTIVES: Clinical studies on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) have been carried out for the resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). So far, few studies have compared the survival outcomes of nCT plus ICIs and nCT alone. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ICIs combined with nCT versus nCT followed by esophagectomy for patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ESCC patients underwent nCT or nCT combined with ICIs followed by esophagectomy (from March 2013 to April 2021) was performed. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) with a caliper 0.01 was conducted to balance potential bias. RESULTS: A total of 47 comparable pairs of ESCC patients receiving nCT and nCT combined with ICIs were selected for the final analysis. The tumor regression grade (TRG) 0 and pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in the nCT+ICIs group were significantly higher than those of the nCT group (21.7% vs. 4.5%, P=0.016; and 17.0% vs. 2.1%, P=0.035, respectively). The rate of nerve invasion was 4.3% in the nCT+ICIs group, significantly lower than 23.4% of the nCT group (P=0.007). The incidences of adverse events in the nCT+ICIs group were similar compared with the nCT group and there was no grade 5 toxicity in either group. The 1-, 2-year disease-free survival rates (DFS) were 95.7%, 80.7% and 76.1%, 63.8% in the two groups (P=0.001, and P=0.046, respectively). The 1-year OS was improved in the nCT+ICIs group, which was close to a statistical difference (95.7% vs. 84.8%, P=0.074). Local recurrence rate in the nCT+ICIs group was 6.4%, significantly lower than 21.3% of the nCT group (P=0.036), while there was no significant difference in the distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with nCT alone, neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus nCT for patients with locally advanced ESCC has an advantage in pathological response, and could improve DFS with a good safety and feasibility, while long term survival validation is still needed further. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9585292/ /pubmed/36275724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.970534 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jing, Zhai, Zhang, He, Liu, Yao, Wang, Tian, Wang and Liu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Jing, Shao-Wu Zhai, Chang Zhang, Wei He, Ming Liu, Qing-Yi Yao, Ji-Fang Wang, Rui Tian, Zi-Qiang Wang, Jun Liu, Jun-Feng Comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching |
title | Comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching |
title_full | Comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching |
title_fullStr | Comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching |
title_short | Comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A propensity score matching |
title_sort | comparison of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9585292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36275724 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.970534 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jingshaowu comparisonofneoadjuvantimmunotherapypluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematching AT zhaichang comparisonofneoadjuvantimmunotherapypluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematching AT zhangwei comparisonofneoadjuvantimmunotherapypluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematching AT heming comparisonofneoadjuvantimmunotherapypluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematching AT liuqingyi comparisonofneoadjuvantimmunotherapypluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematching AT yaojifang comparisonofneoadjuvantimmunotherapypluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematching AT wangrui comparisonofneoadjuvantimmunotherapypluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematching AT tianziqiang comparisonofneoadjuvantimmunotherapypluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematching AT wangjun comparisonofneoadjuvantimmunotherapypluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematching AT liujunfeng comparisonofneoadjuvantimmunotherapypluschemotherapyversuschemotherapyaloneforpatientswithlocallyadvancedesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomaapropensityscorematching |